Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Harry Reid, told a small group of us Friday he was cautiously optimistic that he had the votes to defeat the nuclear option, but I think he's wrong," Brooks said Sunday.

When the New York Slimes says the 'Rats have lost, they've lost!

1 posted on 05/22/2005 9:36:12 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: wagglebee

to expand on your comment...


They didn't lose, they have been routed and totally....


2 posted on 05/22/2005 9:37:00 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Is anyone else ready for football to begin again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

this vote, if its true, will end McCain's presidential bid.


3 posted on 05/22/2005 9:37:52 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Good time to get your "Nuke the 'rats T-shirt.


4 posted on 05/22/2005 9:40:00 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Everyone forgets McManiac can pull a Ross Pirouette and run independent.

Leni

6 posted on 05/22/2005 9:43:30 AM PDT by MinuteGal ("The Marines keep coming. We are shooting, but the Marines won't stop !" (Fallujah Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Filibuster is wrong, any way you look at it.......it usurps the will of the voters as expressed by the elections that placed the Senators in office in proportion shown by the number of "majority" and "minority" parties.....filibuster is a perversion of Roberts Rules of Order that is absolutely contrary to the concept of "representative government", for good or bad.


7 posted on 05/22/2005 9:45:08 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Looks like frat boy has grown a pair. Good for him.


8 posted on 05/22/2005 9:46:11 AM PDT by Search4Truth (When a man lies he murders some part of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I love the smell of Napalm in the morning...


18 posted on 05/22/2005 9:50:27 AM PDT by veronica (AntiCP - join the fun at the new forum...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee


Check this one out



19 posted on 05/22/2005 9:51:41 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (US servicemen, saving the world one day at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

In the immortal words of Pres. Whitmore: Nuke em. Nuke the #@$%@&^*!

21 posted on 05/22/2005 9:52:20 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
When the New York Slimes says the 'Rats have lost, they've lost!

A long way to go yet (and the Dem's are trying to find a way to slime one more GOP'er).

And when the NYT admits the Dem's have lost before the game is even over....My antenna goes up? (and not in a good way).

29 posted on 05/22/2005 9:58:08 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
I stand by my prediction.

If Reid doesn't have the votes to win on the nuclear option then the Dems will supply the votes necessary to get to the 60 needed for cloture, tuck their tails between their legs, stall the Senate in several minor ways, piss and moan, but in the end regroup to fight this battle on another day when they might be able to muster the one or two additional votes they need to beat Frist.

There will be no vote on the nuclear option. Neither side really wants and it won't be needed. For McPain and the other RINOs, their cover will be lost and they will have to go on record and vote up or down for a bunch of Bush nominees that are way too conservative for them. That is what all this deal making has been about. They don't want to go on the record one way or the other. They don't want to vote yes because they don't like the nominees. They don't want to vote no because it would hurt them with the party base. Much easier to just let the Dems kill the nominations. But it's not going to turn out that way. Frist will win.

34 posted on 05/22/2005 10:01:36 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Successfully busting the filibuster means nothing less than the successful future of the Republican Party. The importance of winning on this cannot be overstated.


41 posted on 05/22/2005 10:08:40 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"John McCain, Lincoln Chafee, John Warner and maybe Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe will vote against the nuclear option, but none of the other Republicans are likely to."

This should be a test of party loyalty. A no vote should mean committee reassignments. If the RINOs want to be Democrooks, so be it.

44 posted on 05/22/2005 10:09:57 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
If Frist doesn't have the votes, the Rhino's will become goats.

What happened to you Frist? I thought I had the votes.

51 posted on 05/22/2005 10:15:37 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Don't celebrate yet guys. There are still a lot of people who could go wobbly on us.

It's not over until Barbara Mikulski sings.


53 posted on 05/22/2005 10:17:43 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"seems to have the votes."

Well, DUH!!!! ANYTIME the Dems start offering deals, they are LOSING. What is so freakin' hard about this to understand if you're the lamestream media?

55 posted on 05/22/2005 10:20:23 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The article Carl is referring to was posted in unnecessarily excerpted form here on FR.

You can read the entire article on the NYT website by following this link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/22/opinion/22brooks.html?pagewanted=print

Oh, and if you're asked to log in, feel free to use my
Member ID: upchuck6
and my
Password: upchuck

56 posted on 05/22/2005 10:21:13 AM PDT by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"John McCain, Lincoln Chafee, John Warner and maybe Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe will vote against the nuclear option, but none of the other Republicans are likely to."

Then Cheney gets to vote.

59 posted on 05/22/2005 10:22:25 AM PDT by demlosers ("freedom to attack as well as freedom from attack")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist reportedly has the votes to enforce the so-called "nuclear option" against judicial filibusters instigated by Democrats, despite claims to the contrary by Minority Leader Harry Reid. Which means of course that you can count on Frist not to go through with it but to cut a deal to try to look like a "statesman" for his presidential bid.
63 posted on 05/22/2005 10:29:15 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
But according to New York Times columnist David Brooks, Reid was blowing smoke.

According to SkyPilot, the New York Times is blowing smoke by denying Frist has the votes.

69 posted on 05/22/2005 10:38:06 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson