Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thomas: Anti-smoking activist tangles with pols, loses
The (Memphis) Commerical Appeal ^ | 22 May 2005 | Wendi Thomas

Posted on 05/22/2005 8:51:33 AM PDT by Maigrey

Clark Plunk wants the state to ban smoking in restaurants.

He wants it so much that he planned to run for the legislature when he found out that his representative wasn't of a similar smoke-free mind.

Rep. W.C. 'Bubba' Pleasant, a smoker, "told me his view is if you own a restaurant or bar, it should be your prerogative to say if you want smoking or non-smoking," says Plunk.

Plunk's view is that smokers' rights stop at the tip of his nose.

When Cuba, land of the fine cigar, bans smoking in restaurants, but bills to do the same in Tennessee fail year after year, well, that sticks in Plunk's craw.

In a beat 'em and join 'em move, Plunk, 57, of Lakeland, entered the race against Pleasant in the Republican primary.

And in the process, he learned an important lesson about lawmaking: A politically naive small business owner with a cause is no match for savvy legislators who, despite the promises they make, choose not to make the health of non-smoking restaurant patrons and employees a priority.

Soon after Plunk, who owns a cleaning company, entered the race, he got a call from House Republican leader Tre Hargett.

If he and Pleasant promised to vote for 'no smoking' laws, would Plunk take himself off the ballot? Hargett asked.

"I was naive enough to say yes, I'll do that," Plunk said.

"What I was naive about is they didn't have any interest in letting any non-smoking legislation get out of committee."

With just a week left in this session, no such bill has emerged from committee. Plunk believes Hargett and Pleasant had good reason to suspect they'd never have to make good on their promise.

In January, Democratic state Sen. Steve Cohen introduced a bill to allow local governments to regulate smoking in restaurants. Plunk asked Hargett and Pleasant to sign on.

"If you do this, I will feel that you have kept your promise to me to support anti-smoking legislation. Can I count on you to support this legislation?" he wrote Hargett.

Their answer? No.

Hargett and Pleasant acknowledge that Plunk was promised support in exchange for his withdrawal from the primary. The misunderstanding stems, evidently, from how you define support.

They maintain they agreed only to vote for the bill if it came before one of the committees on which they sit, or the full House.

"I could have co-sponsored the bill," Hargett said, but didn't "because I had other legislative priorities."

Said Pleasant: "If you carry a bill, you have to be committed to it," and he never was fully behind a ban that would take away people's rights.

Plus, he said, "They don't ever quit with one thing." Outlaw smoking in restaurant, Pleasant figures, and the next thing you know, they -- whoever they is -- will outlaw fast food.

That logic, Cohen said, is "absurd. The fat content and the calories and the carbs, it hurts the person who eats it, it doesn't hurt the person sitting next to the person eating it."

Cohen's proposed legislation would have trumped the 1994 law that prevents local municipalities from passing smoking laws stronger than state law, which requires only that restaurants have a 'no smoking' section.

Letting local governments handle their own affairs is traditionally a Republican value, but so is backing big business. The state's restaurant association and the mighty tobacco lobby, Cohen said, is against a smoking ban. Change will come only when more citizens like Plunk and more local communities lobby the legislature for change, he said.

Despite the misunderstanding, Plunk says he's still a Republican and that he isn't mad at Hargett or Pleasant.

"I'm mad at myself for being naive enough to trust Tre and Bubba," Plunk said in an e-mail to Cohen. "Thank goodness the terms only last two years. If this legislation doesn't pass, I will run against him next year and Tre won't talk me out of it."

Although rebuffed in Nashville, Plunk, a former pack-a-day Marlboro Lights smoker who had a heart attack three years ago, isn't deterred.

Each time a state, city or country bans smoking in restaurants, he lets Pleasant and Hargett know, via e-mail.

He patronizes restaurants that ban smoking in their dining rooms.

To help his sister kick the habit, he buys her nicotine gum.

At his favorite restaurant, Villa Castrioti, he convinced the owners to make one of its bars smoke-free. Signs went up, only to be defaced by smokers who crossed out the "no."

The fight, Plunk knows, is a war, not just one battle, and he's in it for the long haul.

"Our grandchildren are going to make fun of the smokers of today. I just hope I live long enough to see it."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: pufflist; smokenazi; smokingbans; tn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
He's asking for the demise of most of the small bars and independent restaurants in the area - because of his nose. Instead of imposing his views on others, just don't patronize the establishments that cater to others who smoke.

And, last time I checked - smoking is still legal.

And I am a non-smoker.

1 posted on 05/22/2005 8:51:33 AM PDT by Maigrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I know you run the smokers ping list, so would you do your deed?


2 posted on 05/22/2005 8:52:02 AM PDT by Maigrey (Don't make me call the Emperor on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey; Gabz; SheLion
A politically naive small business owner with a cause is no match for savvy legislators who, despite the promises they make, choose not to make the health of non-smoking restaurant patrons and employees a priority.

Nah. No bias in this article.

3 posted on 05/22/2005 8:53:43 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Impetuous! Homeric!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
And, last time I checked - smoking is still legal.

And if "they" continue to ban smoking, then the cigarette tax dollars contributing to the state should stop!  Billions of tax dollars being paid 100% by the smokers.  Not Big Tobacco and not the government.  But the smoker's.

Smoker's are paying for this personal abuse.

4 posted on 05/22/2005 8:54:18 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I take that back. It appears to be an editorial.


5 posted on 05/22/2005 8:54:53 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Impetuous! Homeric!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
The state's restaurant association and the mighty tobacco lobby, Cohen said, is against a smoking ban.

Cohen does not have a clue what he's talking about. Most restaurant associations have a history of supporting the bans. As for the tobacco lobby - they either sit out the arguement or support the bans outright.

6 posted on 05/22/2005 9:00:50 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Plunk's view is that smokers' rights stop at the tip of his nose.

No, Plunk's rights stop when he enters someone else's private property.

7 posted on 05/22/2005 9:02:04 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
Letting local governments handle their own affairs is traditionally a Republican value, but so is backing big business. The state's restaurant association and the mighty tobacco lobby, Cohen said, is against a smoking ban. Change will come only when more citizens like Plunk and more local communities lobby the legislature for change, he said.

Actually, the real Republican value is not having the government involve itself in personal and business decisions. A restaurant should be allowed to make it's own choice about whether to allow smoking and should be then accept the business consequences either way. If a restaurant bans smoking entirely, it will lose the business of some smokers. If it refuses to ban smoking, it will lose the business of some non-smokers. If it finds a way to design a non-smoking section that effectively segregates the smokers and the non-smokers, it will lose only the business of those who can't stand letting other individuals make their own choices. Unfortunately, that group seems to be getting bigger.

Bill

8 posted on 05/22/2005 9:06:09 AM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
No, Plunk's rights stop when he enters someone else's private property.

Well said!

9 posted on 05/22/2005 9:06:49 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WFTR
Unfortunately, that group seems to be getting bigger.

You are correct. And it is amazing just how many FReepers are proud to be in that group.

10 posted on 05/22/2005 9:07:55 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I wish more people would understand that little factoid. While you have the right to enter a private business that does business with the public - it is still a private business and you are obligated to abide by the owner's rules.


11 posted on 05/22/2005 9:10:49 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
When Cuba

I suggest Plunk move to Cuba.

12 posted on 05/22/2005 9:14:01 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
When Cuba, land of the fine cigar, bans smoking in restaurants, but bills to do the same in Tennessee fail year after year, well, that sticks in Plunk's craw.

I suggest Plunk move to Cuba.

13 posted on 05/22/2005 9:14:53 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

"I take that back. It appears to be an editorial."

Matters not, the Commercial Appeal is just another big-city liberal rag. My Mom has taken to hiding parts of it from me when I visit. :)


14 posted on 05/22/2005 9:15:11 AM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
Anti-smoking activist tangles with pols, loses

I've sort of reached the point in my life where I'm starting to consider the word "activist" to be a euphemism for "Professional, Big-Mouthed A$$hole" and decided that anything said by someone who's a "self-described activist" can safely be ignored out-of-hand.

15 posted on 05/22/2005 9:20:38 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Every evil which liberals imagine Judaism and Christianity to be, Islam is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey; SheLion
"Our grandchildren are going to make fun of the smokers of today. I just hope I live long enough to see it."

The reformed whore, putatively a "Republican," is eager to have individual choice become the object of mockery in the near future.

He's not naive, he's stupid.

16 posted on 05/22/2005 9:27:30 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
I wish more people would understand that little factoid. While you have the right to enter a private business that does business with the public - it is still a private business and you are obligated to abide by the owner's rules.

It's like when we visit friends.  If they are non-smokers, we do not smoke in their house or vehicle.  Unless they invite us to do so.  It's no different when a business owner open's his doors.  His business his rules.  Period.  

17 posted on 05/22/2005 9:37:48 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
He's not naive, he's stupid.

Most of them are.  In every state.  I don't know how decent people work in State Houses.  They stink to high heaven.

18 posted on 05/22/2005 9:39:54 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey

It's always nice to see a freedom grabber get slapped down.


19 posted on 05/22/2005 9:44:10 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan (""Some Run, Some Fight, but I win they lose!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey

Ah, Mr. Plunk thinks he is God.


20 posted on 05/22/2005 9:53:51 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson