Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maigrey; Gabz; SheLion
A politically naive small business owner with a cause is no match for savvy legislators who, despite the promises they make, choose not to make the health of non-smoking restaurant patrons and employees a priority.

Nah. No bias in this article.

3 posted on 05/22/2005 8:53:43 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Impetuous! Homeric!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


I take that back. It appears to be an editorial.


5 posted on 05/22/2005 8:54:53 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Impetuous! Homeric!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro
Plunk's view is that smokers' rights stop at the tip of his nose.

No, Plunk's rights stop when he enters someone else's private property.

7 posted on 05/22/2005 9:02:04 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro
Ms. Thomas is a kool-aid drinker, but shows glimmers of just about getting it.

Then, she takes a sip, and goes back.

28 posted on 05/22/2005 12:53:17 PM PDT by Maigrey (Don't make me call the Emperor on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson