Kitty Kelley not purring about critics [Projectile Barf Alert]

seattlepi.com ^ | May 22, 2005 | MARIANNE MEANS

[Piquaboy]

Being a woman, she should know a lot about bushes.

[TGOGary]

The fact that Bush won despite this lunatic's rants just proves that the American people did not buy into her fiction.

[Howlin]

I consider Kelley a friend.

Basically all we need to know about Marianne, huh?

[Bahbah]

Despite all sorts of threats, Kelley has never been successfully sued by any of her subjects.

Interesting sentence. It doesn't say she was actually sued by anyone who then lost on the merits, but manages to imply just that.

[Noachian]

The moral here is that it is foolish to let the White House pick your book list; read Kelley and make up your own mind about the Bushes.

I don't "let the White House pick my book list", and I certainly won't let a hack liberal columnist, who wants her friend to make money from book sales, pick it either.

[MizSterious]

"Yet without having read a line, Republican sycophants trashed it relentlessly with extremist language like "garbage" and "fiction." "

Hilarious. Sounds exactly like what the DemocRAT sycophants do regularly, for instance, with the Swift Boat books. However, with Kelley, just seeing her name on a book is proof that most if not all of what is in it is a big fat lie. Including "a," "the," and "and."

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Her book is #14 ? Jane Fonda's book is #1. So what ?

[federal]

Yet it turns out a lot of people trust Kelley more than the president's paid hacks. According to Publishers' Weekly, Kelley's book finished 14th on its 2004 best-seller list, with 715,000 copies sold

How impressive but the last time the people of the USA were asked if they trusted President Bush, 60 million voted that indeed they did.

So let's see 14th on the 2004 best seller list on one hand. Then being re-elected with more votes than any President in the history of the USA.

With journalist this stupid is it any wonder why the MSM is in the mess it is in, they are indeed lucky they have any readers at all. Although it is arguable if anyone on DU can or ever does read anything.

[Always Right]

Despite all sorts of threats, Kelley has never been successfully sued by any of her subjects. A team of lawyers carefully reviewed this book, as well as the others.

Certainly, she had to have team lawyers review the book to ensure Kelly had all the proper weasle words in the book so she could not be sued for her lies and inuedos.

[Lucky2]

This woman is one of the reasons why we do not subscribe to the Seattle PI or the Seattle Times. They're both a bunch of liberal rags out to trash the right which ever way they can.
This dumb broad is a good example.

[tet68]

When will her "scathing" bio of Bill and Hillery! come out?

[EdHallick]

Curious how I can`t find a book on the Clintons by Kitty.

[EdHallick]

I guess she values her life.

[EdHallick]

Kitty makes the mistake of writing a book on Hitlery.....

[rockrr]

Whoever wrote, "This isn't good writing...this isn't even good typing!" surely had Kitty Kelley in mind ;'}

[Gunrunner2]

>> But too many journalists and others find it easier to believe White House fabrications rather than the printed word, no matter how heavily footnoted. <<

Yeah. . ."footnoted." Footnotes that cite newspaper accounts and second and third-hand whining, bitter ex-employees and political rivals. . .all very credible---NOT!

[TexasCajun]

MARIANNE MEANS is Left of Dr. Deaniac and suffers from

"SLD" -- Severe Liberalism Disorder!

[RichInOC]

Before the hardcover book was published, the contents were surrounded in secrecy; no advance copies, no leaks. Yet without having read a line, Republican sycophants trashed it relentlessly with extremist language like "garbage" and "fiction."

Perhaps they'd read her previous books and played the percentages?

Look, the thought of Nancy Reagan and Frank Sinatra engaging in a little "John! Marsha! John! Marsha!" in the White House is surely an entertaining one. Credible? Not so much.

[SkyDancer]

Sort of like you being arrested for whatever but the case dismissed because of lack of merit. Then you being asked on an employment form if you've ever been arrested. Not have you been convicted of any crime, just have you been arrested. What do you say?