Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laura leaves 'em laughing, gasping (Not a very family-values-type speech..very risque: David Korn)
WashingtonTimes ^ | May 02, 2005 | By Joseph Curl

Posted on 05/02/2005 6:00:13 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay

Who knew? First lady Laura Bush took over the podium from her husband at Saturday night's annual White House Correspondents' Association dinner and knocked 'em dead, keeping Washington's most powerful politicos in stitches as she worked the ballroom like a seasoned stand-up comic.

CUT

Although Washington's movers and shakers laughed at Mrs. Bush's performance, some in the press woke up with a Sunday morning hangover and began to criticize her monologue as immodest at best and downright bawdy at worst.

"Laura Bush cracks risque jokes at the White House Correspondents' dinner," sniffed Agence France-Presse. CNN reporter Elaine Quijano, who attended the dinner, also apparently had her sensibilities scarred by some of the first lady's quips.

"In some respects, I think for some folks it was a little shocking because she kind of crossed the line a little bit in some people's minds," she said.

"It was very risque," the Nation's David Korn said yesterday on Fox News. "I was wondering what the social conservatives and James Dobson had to say about all these jokes that were laced with sexual innuendo. Not a very family-values-type speech. I'm not sure I want to explain a lot of those jokes to my 4-year-old."

Eyebrows were raised by the first lady's bit about the president's ranching skills, which Mrs. Bush said her husband lacked because the elite schools he attended, Andover and Yale, "don't have a real strong ranching program."

She then added: "He's learned a lot about ranching since that first year when he tried to milk the horse. What's worse, it was a male horse."

The crowd howled. The joke, a female Associated Press reporter said, "had women giggling in the bathroom."

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agencefrancepresse; churchlady; cnn; davidkorn; elainequijano; falseoutrage; freepawards; getoverit; itsaroast; keepyerdayjob; laurabush; laurawasasmashhit; laurawasjoking; laurawassmashed; mediabias; ohboohoohoo; perverthypocrites; saturdaynightroast; takingitooseriously; thumpinmybible; turass; unfunnyjokes; unwadthepanties; vulgarfirstlady; whcadinner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 1,281-1,294 next last
To: Peach
That's because you have a sense of humor. The rest of us are told constantly that we aren't Christian enough. Or conservative enough. You know the drill. They show up like clockwork to complain and wring their hands. In reality, they are the most fake Christians you'll ever meet. That's because you have a sense of humor. The rest of us are told constantly that we aren't Christian enough. Or conservative enough. You know the drill. They show up like clockwork to complain and wring their hands. In reality, they are the most fake Christians you'll ever meet.

Great post and so very true they are fake Christian with a political agenda full stop.

821 posted on 05/02/2005 11:18:16 AM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME - Vote Conservative 5th May 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

LOL!


822 posted on 05/02/2005 11:18:16 AM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
LOL!

Thanks!

Love it!

823 posted on 05/02/2005 11:18:34 AM PDT by Pippin ( I still say Richard III was framed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 819 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Better a true conservative who supports the foundational principles - governmental, moral, and economic - on which this republic was founded than the libertine who says he is conservative but really is not, save perhaps in economics and national defense.


824 posted on 05/02/2005 11:18:41 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
(the code words in that post are public school)

/gang message

825 posted on 05/02/2005 11:19:14 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

C'mon! Laura Bush is the new Minnie Pearl.


826 posted on 05/02/2005 11:19:20 AM PDT by Clemenza (I am NOT A NUMBER, I am a FREE MAN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
Guess what, as a God fearing Christian, and a happily married (17 years) woman, I have been to a Chippendales type show with my girlfriends (all married).

Well, now you're done it; surely you will be damned to hell.

827 posted on 05/02/2005 11:20:15 AM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Make Way for Ducklings" (gasp!)

What are you, some kind of subversive? They read that book in public schools! Laura Bush has probably read it, too - and started her downward spiral.

828 posted on 05/02/2005 11:20:48 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 819 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I would be quite happy to say it to your face.


829 posted on 05/02/2005 11:21:10 AM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME - Vote Conservative 5th May 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
OK...........now I seriously think you're insane.

Insane? Crazy, yes. Insane, no. Running a show on primetime TV that glorifies adultery - in a day and age when marriages are failing, now THAT'S insane. Or at least it USED to be considered such.

Read this very carefully, dirtboy.......Laura did NOT promote adultery. Anyone who thinks she did, is looking for perversion where there is none.

Where did I say she promoted adultery? I said she referenced a show that does such. The point is, I really don't think we need to have the First Lady telling jokes that involve the most vapid, vile, depraved show in prime time - IMO that show instead should be condemned every possible opportunity. If that's insane, then that means that the depraved has become sane.

830 posted on 05/02/2005 11:21:28 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 820 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
OMG, this is for you, too:


831 posted on 05/02/2005 11:22:01 AM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: Pippin

I agree my little hobbit


832 posted on 05/02/2005 11:22:03 AM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME - Vote Conservative 5th May 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: snugs
I would be quite happy to say it to your face.

Ah, so you're just as crass in person as you are on the internet.

No wonder you don't have an issue with Laura's jokes.

833 posted on 05/02/2005 11:22:20 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
I have been to a Chippendales type show with my girlfriends (all married).

Uh-oh! You opened up a big can o' worms! ;D

834 posted on 05/02/2005 11:22:54 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Matthew 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Christians WAS in quotes for a reason. I highly doubt that most of you claiming the moral high ground here really are.

You highly doubt that most of us are Christians?!

There's no way to differentiate between what you say, and what the biased left wrongly stereotypes real Christians as thinking.

You blame others for your lack of discernment? (I'm curious about anything I said that sounds like something you think the left could use against us.)

The people whom I KNOW are Christians, almost to a person, were not offended by what the First Lady said.

So, there's hope for me, yet?

Methinks your politics has gotten in the way of your common sense, and your use of the moral high ground is nothing but a sham.

Well, that's nice.

835 posted on 05/02/2005 11:22:55 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
Better a true conservative who supports the foundational principles - governmental, moral, and economic - on which this republic was founded than the libertine who says he is conservative but really is not, save perhaps in economics and national defense.

So, are you saying that LB should be put in stocks with a scarlet letter on her forehead or were you talking about other founding morals?

836 posted on 05/02/2005 11:23:10 AM PDT by ShowMeMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
Now while I would never go back, I am not ashamed to have gone.

Interesting. And, just to explore your sensibility, if you came home to see your husband, with four or five adult Christian men, hooting and hollering at a naked female exotic dancer, would that be okay too?

The red states are starting to look a little bluer than they used to.
837 posted on 05/02/2005 11:23:27 AM PDT by farmer18th ("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
Better a true conservative who supports the foundational principles - governmental, moral, and economic - on which this republic was founded than the libertine who says he is conservative but really is not, save perhaps in economics and national defense.

Are you dissing Thomas Jefferon and the Founders now?

838 posted on 05/02/2005 11:23:31 AM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Nobody ever said a First Lady can't gently skewer her husband at a roast.

As pointed out in post 410, she did that very well --with some of her jokes. Others crossed the line.

And nobody ever said that it isn't "refreshing to have a wife get up and be the center of attention." I don't know what that has to do with the argument here.

I find the comments on this thread more about the people themselves than Laura Bush. It is a Rorschach test on their emotional and intellectual functioning and integration.

Ah, thank you so much for gracing us with your superiority and your insight into the minds of us low-functioning ones.

Are you a shrink, mayhaps? Or do you just play one here?

It's funny, by coincidence last night there was an interview with Dr. Charles Krauthammer shown on C-Span.

Dr. Krauthammer, who does hold a degree in psychiatry, went to great length to explain that even shrinks should not pretend to divine "emotional and intellectual functioning" from someone's political arguments.

839 posted on 05/02/2005 11:24:08 AM PDT by shhrubbery! (The 'right to choose' = The right to choose death --for somebody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Your wife has no life or thought of her own?

LOL. That's not what the Bible says. But, that's certainly how the naysayers want you to read it.

840 posted on 05/02/2005 11:25:21 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 811 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 1,281-1,294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson