Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Table Top Fusion Device (That doesn't break the law)
NY Times ^ | April 28, 2005 | KENNETH CHANG

Posted on 04/28/2005 11:22:26 AM PDT by ckilmer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 28, 2005 Itty-Bitty and Shrinking, Fusion Device Has Big Ideas By KENNETH CHANG

n a surprising feat of miniaturization, scientists are reporting today that they have produced nuclear fusion - the same process that powers the sun - in a footlong cylinder just five inches in diameter. And they say they will soon be able to make the device even smaller.

While the device is probably too inefficient to produce electricity or other forms of energy, the scientists say, egg-size fusion generators could someday find uses in spacecraft thrusters, medical treatments and scanners that search for bombs.

The findings, by a team at the University of California, Los Angeles, led by Dr. Seth J. Putterman, are being reported in the journal Nature.

The minifusion device accelerates hydrogen atoms and slams them together to produce helium. Unlike earlier claims of tabletop fusion - "cold fusion," in 1989, which suggested that energy could be produced by running electricity through water and metal plates, and "sonofusion," in 2002, in which collapsing bubbles supposedly heat gases to starlike temperatures - this report is not being greeted with skepticism.

"I think it's very persuasive," said Dr. William Happer, a professor of physics at Princeton.

Dr. Michael J. Saltmarsh, a retired scientist who worked at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, said the energy of the particles emitted by the collisions convincingly matched what was expected for fusion. Dr. Saltmarsh was one of two Oak Ridge scientists who said they were unable to detect the signatures of fusion in the 2002 sonofusion experiment.

In a commentary accompanying the Nature paper, Dr. Saltmarsh described the new device as "intriguingly simple" and added, "Indeed, in some ways it is remarkably low tech."

By contrast with the earlier claims, the U.C.L.A. researchers do not assert that their invention will provide unlimited energy. "What we've built so far," Dr. Putterman said, "no chance."

Indeed, the new device does not even produce enough energy to warm the hand. But it could be useful as a source of neutrons, the subatomic particles that are a byproduct of fusion. Because neutrons do not have any electrical charge, they can penetrate deep into matter, and that could provide a way to peer easily into luggage or cargo containers.

"We can give them a little tiny front end for a camera that can look behind things," Dr. Putterman said.

The central component of the device is a crystal of lithium tantalate, which belongs to a class of materials known as pyroelectrics. Pyroelectrics, which generate strong electric fields when heated or cooled, have long been known, possibly described as far back as 314 B.C. by a student of Aristotle.

"It's quite a surprise to see it used in this way," Dr. Happer of Princeton said.

In the experiment, the crystal, a cylinder about an inch and a quarter in diameter and a half-inch in length, was mounted inside the footlong cylinder and surrounded by a gas of deuterium, a heavy version of hydrogen. Warming the crystal about 50 degrees Fahrenheit produced a charge of 1,000 volts. That created electric fields around a tungsten tip that were so strong that they ripped electrons off the deuterium and accelerated the charged deuterium ions into a target that also contained deuterium.

When one deuterium ion hit a deuterium atom, fusion occurred. Sometimes. But because only one in a million of the collisions actually produce fusion, the device is an inefficient generator of energy.

The jet of deuterium ions could serve as thrusters for small spacecraft, and X-rays produced by electrons' being caught in the powerful electric fields might be useful for treating tumors.

The current device produces only about 1,000 neutrons a second, few enough that it would not be dangerous to use even in a physics demonstration, Dr. Saltmarsh said. The researchers plan a more powerful version by replacing deuterium in the target with tritium, an even heavier form of hydrogen, generating about 250 times as many neutrons. Additional improvements should raise the rate to a million neutrons a second.

Commercial neutron generators, which can already make a million neutrons a second, similarly accelerate deuterium into targets, but they rely on high-voltage power sources to generate the electric fields.

By relying on pyroelectric crystals instead, the U.C.L.A. research could lead to generators that are much simpler and less expensive.

"What Putterman's made is an amazing little accelerator," Dr. Happer said. "It's a version of that that doesn't need any high voltage."

Dr. Putterman says he envisions a device consisting just of an egg-size container with a crystal, deuterium gas and the target inside. Plunging the container into ice water or warming it with body heat would be enough to set off the reactions. "We can diddle temperature a mere 30 degrees and generate fields that make fusion," he said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: bubblefusion; crystal; energy; fusion; nuclearfusion; physics; science; sonofusion; sonoluminescence; tabletopfusion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 04/28/2005 11:22:34 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Didn't Uncle Rico use some of his sweet moolah to buy one of these things off of the internet? He's still walking funny...
2 posted on 04/28/2005 11:31:34 AM PDT by Luddite Patent Counsel ("Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Bookmark BUMP


3 posted on 04/28/2005 11:33:48 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - Any Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luddite Patent Counsel

Next thing, our cars will be fueled by Mr. Fusion.


4 posted on 04/28/2005 11:34:21 AM PDT by Terabitten (I have a duty as an AMERICAN, not a Republican. We can never put Party above Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
The central component of the device is a crystal of lithium tantalate,

They are sooo close! I could tell them to use the di-lithium crystals, but would they listen? Noooooooooo

5 posted on 04/28/2005 11:35:15 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

6 posted on 04/28/2005 11:35:57 AM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I always wanted to irradiate my kitchen with neutrons and alpha particles. Microwaves are SO 1975!

I thought that neutron activation was usually a BAD thing in a home. Nevertheless, I had more than one amateur science project that could have cost me fingers as a kid, so I kinda want one.


7 posted on 04/28/2005 11:37:05 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Table Top Fusion Device (That doesn't break the law)


8 posted on 04/28/2005 11:37:17 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Deuterium's on sale this week @ Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luddite Patent Counsel

I thought they used it to nuke a Kay-suh-dilla and some tots.


9 posted on 04/28/2005 11:39:06 AM PDT by Lekker 1 ("There is not the slightest indication that nuclear energy will ever be attainable"- Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lekker 1

Maybe then he'll stop ruining our lives and eating all our steaks!


10 posted on 04/28/2005 11:43:18 AM PDT by Luddite Patent Counsel ("Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

umm...

miles usually doesn't talk about neutrons...

no...miles usually doesn't talk about neutrons.

fusion yes. but he means something different.

but in practice its mostly a young man's game if he's got britches

or a young ..... game if she breathes.

that's why you know mile's god would be female.

someone you don't trust for the Word.

miles music is another matter--long as you don't mind being a little top heavy.


11 posted on 04/28/2005 11:47:40 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...

12 posted on 04/28/2005 11:48:23 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luddite Patent Counsel

His video was sweet. And you have like the slowest reflexes, ever.


13 posted on 04/28/2005 11:52:03 AM PDT by Holicheese (How many more must die Mister Speaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

FYI: another mini-fusion article!


14 posted on 04/28/2005 11:54:12 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Would't that be nice? Electric motors are extremely simple and reliable and with a Mr. Fusion you could build an electric plane that could fly around the world 50 times without refuelling!


15 posted on 04/28/2005 11:55:07 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Controlled Fusion isn't the problem or the goal.
We need controlled fusion that is a net producer of energy rather than a consumer of it.

So9

16 posted on 04/28/2005 11:56:40 AM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
FYI: another mini-fusion article!

Same news as yesterday's thread, also from UCLA.

17 posted on 04/28/2005 11:57:46 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Great. I expect a nuclear fusion power plant no bigger than a PC, with enough power to light the city of Topeka, for my own personal use, on my desktop, by the end of next year. I ordered this on another thread, and see? The major work is already done. Keep up the good work. Out.


18 posted on 04/28/2005 11:58:58 AM PDT by johnb838 (Free Republicans... To Arms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I need a car that gets 20,000 miles to the gallon. Same time table, end of next year. See? I don't believe in pushing people too hard. I could have said end of THIS year.


19 posted on 04/28/2005 12:01:19 PM PDT by johnb838 (Free Republicans... To Arms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

PatrickHenry

yeah I saw that article you posted.

All told I believe this makes for four approaches to fusion short of the BIG THING fusion reactor the Japanese and French are currently jawing over producing in their respective countries.

There's this table top fushion, there's Bubble Fusion, Cold Fusion (which has got some DOE support of late) and fusion set in an electromagnetic field some people at Columbia are trying to do.


20 posted on 04/28/2005 12:25:09 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson