1 posted on
04/28/2005 11:22:34 AM PDT by
ckilmer
To: ckilmer
Didn't Uncle Rico use some of his sweet moolah to buy one of these things off of the internet? He's still walking funny...
2 posted on
04/28/2005 11:31:34 AM PDT by
Luddite Patent Counsel
("Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx)
To: ckilmer
3 posted on
04/28/2005 11:33:48 AM PDT by
Nowhere Man
(Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - Any Questions?)
To: ckilmer
The central component of the device is a crystal of lithium tantalate, They are sooo close! I could tell them to use the di-lithium crystals, but would they listen? Noooooooooo
5 posted on
04/28/2005 11:35:15 AM PDT by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
To: ckilmer
To: ckilmer
I always wanted to irradiate my kitchen with neutrons and alpha particles. Microwaves are SO 1975!
I thought that neutron activation was usually a BAD thing in a home. Nevertheless, I had more than one amateur science project that could have cost me fingers as a kid, so I kinda want one.
7 posted on
04/28/2005 11:37:05 AM PDT by
ko_kyi
To: ckilmer
Table Top Fusion Device (That doesn't break the law)
8 posted on
04/28/2005 11:37:17 AM PDT by
martin_fierro
(Deuterium's on sale this week @ Wal-Mart)
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...
12 posted on
04/28/2005 11:48:23 AM PDT by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: PatrickHenry
FYI: another mini-fusion article!
14 posted on
04/28/2005 11:54:12 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: ckilmer
Controlled Fusion isn't the problem or the goal.
We need controlled fusion that is a net producer of energy rather than a consumer of it.
So9
To: ckilmer
Great. I expect a nuclear fusion power plant no bigger than a PC, with enough power to light the city of Topeka, for my own personal use, on my desktop, by the end of next year. I ordered this on another thread, and see? The major work is already done. Keep up the good work. Out.
18 posted on
04/28/2005 11:58:58 AM PDT by
johnb838
(Free Republicans... To Arms!)
To: ckilmer
28 posted on
04/28/2005 12:58:00 PM PDT by
QQQQQ
To: ckilmer
The central component of the device is a crystal of lithium tantalate... Well, OF COURSE you can pull this off if you use a crystal of lithium tantalate. Hasn't the challenge always been to do with WITHOUT lithimum tantalate??? Now THAT would be impressive!
31 posted on
04/28/2005 1:16:55 PM PDT by
The Duke
To: ckilmer
32 posted on
04/28/2005 1:52:35 PM PDT by
ScreamingFist
(Peace through Ignorance)
To: ckilmer
Some may laugh, but this looks very much like "Beam Power Tubes" of old, complete with a grid and beam forming screen with heat as a catalyst instead of high voltage. Enlighten me FReepers.
33 posted on
04/28/2005 1:57:03 PM PDT by
ScreamingFist
(Peace through Ignorance)
To: ckilmer
Not the first claim. Pons and Fleischmann claimed cold fusion back in the 80s (see
Cold Fusion) and others were working on it in the 20s. Maybe this time ...
39 posted on
04/28/2005 6:04:44 PM PDT by
Celtman
(It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
