Posted on 03/30/2005 4:40:57 PM PST by tutstar
Defying all odds Terri is still alive.
Are you being targeted for euthanasia? (Schiavo case only the tip of the iceberg!)
Schiavo parents plan new US Supreme Court appeal
Florida lawmaker says he will consider impeaching Schiavo Judge Greer
If it was my daughter, I would have welcomed these fellows. And maybe they would have.
But, you know the militia made a mistake by contacting the lawyer. Especially one with some morals and values. He is duty bound to turn them in.
It is a shame.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MUST EXPOSE SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE..
Wow. The skies may open.
Honestly, where I am earlier today it was beautiful and sunny, but right after Terri died it became very gray, cloudy, and chilly.
The Pope may leave us this same day.
Yes, I join you in prayer for the Pope.
I'll quietly avoid them, once I know who they are. They have evil in their hearts, therefore they are dangerous.
I had to leave earlier today, but saw the news on Fox about Terri passing away going out the door. MS was true to form right up to the end. He is so full of bile and hatred, that he couldn't even pretend for the cameras.
Poor Terri, denied even the presence of her family, while her murderers stand watch.
Protection for the Disabled
http://www.petitiononline.com/TerriLaw/petition.html
To: US Senate
We the undersigned would like to petition the US Senate to please pass the House version of the Bill to protect the Disabled. Bill number H.R. 1151, “Incapacitated Persons Legal Protection Act”, was introduced by Rep. Dave Weldon on Mar 8th.
With Terri Schindler Schiavo's dehydration and starvation death today, we feel that this bill was the correct version to pass and needs to be resubmitted to the full Senate in honor of Terri. We want this bill voted on, so that we know where our Senators stand on this crucial matter.
A BILL
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide the protections of habeas corpus for certain incapacitated individuals whose life is in jeopardy, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Incapacitated Persons Legal Protection Act of 2005'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
(a) Findings- The Congress finds the following:
(1) Under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, `No State . . . shall deprive any person of life . . . without due process of law...nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.'
(2) Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment empowers Congress `to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions' of the Amendment. The United States Supreme Court has held that under this section, while Congress may not work a `substantive change in the governing law' under the other sections of the Fourteenth Amendment, it may adopt remedial measures exhibiting `a congruence and proportionality between the injury to be prevented or remedied and the means adopted to that end.' Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509, 21 (2004); City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 519-20 (1997).
(b) Purposes- It is the purpose of this Act--
(1) to facilitate balancing the acknowledged right of persons to refuse consent to medical treatment and unwanted bodily intrusions with the right to consent to treatment, food, and fluids so as to preserve their lives; and
(2) in circumstances in which there is a contested judicial proceeding because of dispute about the expressed previous wishes or best interests of a person presently incapable of making known a choice concerning treatment, food, and fluids the denial of which will result in death, to provide that the fundamental due process and equal protection rights of incapacitated persons are protected by ensuring the availability of collateral review through habeas corpus proceedings.
SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF HABEAS PROTECTIONS.
(a) In General- Chapter 153 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking section 2256 and inserting the following:
`Sec. 2256. Extension of habeas protections to certain persons subject to court orders
`(a) For the purposes of this chapter, an incapacitated person shall be deemed to be in custody under sentence of a court established by Congress, or deemed to be in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State Court, as the case may be, when an order of such a court authorizes or directs the withholding or withdrawal of food or fluids or medical treatment necessary to sustain the person's life. In a habeas corpus proceeding under this section the person having custody shall be deemed to encompass those parties authorized or directed by the court order to withdraw or withhold food, fluids, or medical treatment, and there shall be no requirement to produce at the hearing the body of the incapacitated person.
`(b) Subsection (a) does not apply in the case of a judicial proceeding in which no party disputes, and the court finds, that the incapacitated person, while having capacity, had executed a written advance directive valid under applicable law that clearly authorized the withholding or withdrawal of food or fluids or medical treatment in the applicable circumstances.
`(c) As used in this section, the term `incapacitated person' means an individual who is presently incapable of making relevant decisions concerning the provision, withholding, or withdrawal of food, fluids or medical treatment under applicable state law.
`(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to create substantive rights not otherwise secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States or of the several States. '.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The item relating to section 2256 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 153 of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
`2256. Extension of habeas protections to certain persons subject to court orders.'.
(c) Prospective Effect- The remedies specified by this Act shall be available on behalf of any incapacitated person deemed to be in custody by its terms who is alive on or after the effective date of this Act.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
Maybe the predictions of us losing them both on the same day will come true? God is surely speaking to us.
Interesting that one of the leading protestant leaders and the Catholic leader are both in such dire health right now.
You're right, and I can only imagine what God thinks of our country today.
He was probably strangling her ..AGAIN.
Yeah, that's what I thought when I read that.
Very interesting indeed.
How many clues do we need?
Nancy Kramer,of St. Petersburg, Fla., holds a dead rose and a defaced photograph of Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Thursday, March 31, 2005 , in front of Woodside Hospice where she had been holding vigil since Terri Schiavo died earlier in the day. (AP Photo/KathyWillens
That 'draining energy from the dead' aspect you mentioned is significant to me. It is clearly, in occult terms, one of the more evil forms of necromancy. Simply seeking out spirits of the dead to talk with them is bad enough. To attempt to feed off their souls, that's in the realm of sick 'Elric' perfidity.
In pyschological terms, it is evidence of someone who could easilly be capable of cold-blooded murder.
People might call it overkill. I like overkill.
FReegards...
He is extraordinarily evil and obviously DERANGED!!
medical examiner on Fox: "An autopsy will be performed and family concerns are immaterial in this process." Oh well... at least they are consistent.
That being said,I feel empty and drained. I've been at a crime scene since March 18, 2005. The culture of death must be pushed back. We didn't REQUEST IT TO LAND ON FLORIDA'S DOORSTEP.
God Bless Terri...
WE WON'T be moving on!!!!!
The white van is pulling away from Hospice Woodside. No need to follow the white van. Angels are tailing the white van this afternoon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.