I needed a good laugh. This article provided it.
Robert Watson is one of the biggest frauds to ever walk the earth.
In 2002, Third World nations lined up with the US to kick Watson off the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
In the dark of night, after scientists on the IPCC had reached a consensus that there was little or no global warming, the liar Watson rewrote the report to show the earth warming rapidly.
Watson is a piece of communist grabage. He belongs in a clown show.
Time to consider joining the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (I kid you not.....)
From their home page... http://www.vhemt.org/
"Phasing out the human race by voluntarily ceasing to breed will allow Earth's biosphere to return to good health. Crowded conditions and resource shortages will improve as we become less dense."
I guess it all depends on what they mean by "as we become less dense"
Words fail me.....
Paging Julian Simon. Mr. Simon, please answer your Halo-Page.
"Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha!
"Doomed, I tells ya!"--Homer Simpson
I'd be curious to know how they can possible prove this.
So the world is 1/3 full! Party-on.
A report backed by 1,360 scientists from 95 countries.
That's about 15 scientists per country that 'back' this so-called report. How many scientists are there in the US? Russia? China? Europe? India?, etc.
You could probably find 15 scientists from each of 95 countries to 'back' almost any report, one way or another, especially if they are ideologically so inclined.
Who really gives a rat's ass if we use 100 percent of every resource? Really. What is the worst that can happen? We all starve to death and humans cease to exist. Who cares if it happens 100 years from now or 2,000 years from now? What difference does it make?
Now, if we are allowed to continue to create and innovate--this will probably never, ever happen. But, if we let these moon bats dictate our policy it is sure to happen.
Let's have a nuclear war and reduce the excess population. That should make the wackos happy.
Rush must've been freeping us because he'll be talking about this article in the upcoming hour.
Hi, Rush! *Wavies*
I was gonna wait, but it looks like its time to start hoarding everything!
Puhhh-lease!!!!!
You should of warned us with a puke alert. :>)
A million years from now, none of this will matter.
And, for the Earth, a million years will pass in a (figurative) blink of the eye.
You're right! The MSM loves them always pitching a "crisis," and without them skreeching and their phony pseudo scientists vying to get government study grants... nobody would need them. Technology is making them and the theme of this panic piece obsolete!!!
In Malthus' time the population of Britain was about 11 million, which he considered the country was just barely able to feed. He wrote that the idea that the nation could feed double this number, or 22 million, was "probably a greater increase than could with reason be expected". To support double this again, or 44 million, would be "impossible to suppose", and that this impossibility "must be evident to those who have the slightest acquantance with agricultural subjects". Britain today has a population of 58 million, who do not appear to be starving.