Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PRESERVED T. Rex Soft Tissue RECOVERED (Pic)
Star Tribune ^ | 03.24.05 | Randolph Schmid

Posted on 03/24/2005 12:04:54 PM PST by wallcrawlr

WASHINGTON — For more than a century, the study of dinosaurs has been limited to fossilized bones. Now, researchers have recovered 70-million-year-old soft tissue, including what may be blood vessels and cells, from a Tyrannosaurus rex.

If scientists can isolate proteins from the material, they may be able to learn new details of how dinosaurs lived, said lead researcher Mary Higby Schweitzer of North Carolina State University.

"We're doing a lot of stuff in the lab right now that looks promising,'' she said in a telephone interview. But, she said, she does not know yet if scientists will be able to isolate dinosaur DNA from the materials.

The soft tissues were recovered from the thighbone of a T. rex, known as MOR 1125, that was found in a sandstone formation in Montana. The dinosaur was about 18 years old when it died.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; creation; dinosaur; dna; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; maryschweitzer; paleontotology; trex; tyrannosaurus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 481-492 next last
To: Junior
"Not to mention really long tongues."

If you'd like some fun, get a 10ft Breambuster with 2lb test line and a couple of #2 splitshot on the end of the line - no hook. Dangle it in front of a frog or toad when they're feeding at night and let it snap it up and swallow it. PETA would have a fit! but you could really have fun...

161 posted on 03/24/2005 1:37:40 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: kalee
I know what you mean. I can hardly keep my dogs in, and I have a 5-foot fence. And T-rexes are hell on fences...


162 posted on 03/24/2005 1:41:29 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

70 million years? Tell us another Darwinist fairy tale.


163 posted on 03/24/2005 1:51:20 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

The young earth crowd, as you call it, IS right. Don't believe the athiest-liberal-darwinist garbage.


164 posted on 03/24/2005 1:52:40 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sender
I want a T rex! I'll only keep it while it's a puppy.

That's no puppy, that's a Rexling!

165 posted on 03/24/2005 1:54:16 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk

How do you mean? New where? FR?


166 posted on 03/24/2005 1:56:00 PM PST by ACDSWIZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: All

Thankfully the Lord doesnt let you into heaven based on whether you think the earth is 70 billion or 6 thousand years old. Please simply understand youre sinful nature and need for grace.

Evo vs Crea is an excellent debate but please watch the personal attacks.

Pro-Creation here.


167 posted on 03/24/2005 1:59:55 PM PST by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Military family member
Flush it down the toilet?

...and I thought alligators in the sewers were bad.

I think my Animal Control guys will definitely want combat pay to take down one of these things.

168 posted on 03/24/2005 2:01:36 PM PST by AngryJawa (RIP Mark Wilson, Thank You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: oremites
Genesis is a very brief account of what was a momentous event - the creation of the world.

If you read and read the bible, you will discover that to God, creating the universe was simple. Hence it's creation getting so little ink vs say Joseph's life, for example. There is a very specific reason for the difference between the two too.

Genesis does not specifically say that Adam was created as a full-grown man. You are assuming that He did.

It does say it, but if you want those exact words then you can sit back and think that you are right. But you are wrong.

169 posted on 03/24/2005 2:02:46 PM PST by biblewonk (I would'nt want to live like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: balch3
70 million years? Tell us another Darwinist fairy tale.

A word of advice. Just because something might be too difficult for you to understand doesn't mean it is not true.

I know 70 million is a big number to you, but lots of other people can count that high.

170 posted on 03/24/2005 2:05:16 PM PST by Modernman ("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: ACDSWIZ
How do you mean? New where? FR?

Well, yes. I took the liberty of checking your profile and see that ACDSWIZ is fairly new. I also see that you don't have too terribly many posts to your name. If I checked right that is.

So perhaps you don't realize how many zillions of posts and man hours goes into FR Creation vs Evolution threads. It's usually the same old people around here and we all know each other pretty well. So those of us that believe in Biblical Creation believe that the bible specifically says that the whole universe is 6000 years old.

When I first got saved this was pretty new to me having been taught in a secular public school. But I soon discovered a whole community, of fundamental Christians, who reject all the "science" I had been taught and believe in biblical creation. We have some pretty interesting evidences on our side too.

Forgive me but even as I type there is a bit of skepticism in my heart as to whether you really don't realize all of these things and are just playing around. We see a lot of that here on the FR.

171 posted on 03/24/2005 2:07:58 PM PST by biblewonk (I would'nt want to live like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

"...70 million years old, yet still flexible..."

I don't have a problem with the still flexible and flesh like; I think the poopycock is in the '70 million years old'.

Maybe if we can resussitate this thing, it can tell us how old it really is.


172 posted on 03/24/2005 2:08:34 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Just go look at cliffs and then realize how long it takes for each layer to build up.

You see layers and think "that must have taken a long time." I see layers and think "that must have been some flood." Read about how fast layers can form.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i4/canyon.asp

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4305news5-17-2000.asp

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/geology.asp


Furthermore, carbon dating, which can be off, would have to be off in every single case by millions of years to get the dating wrong.....and they would have to be off by the same amount! That just is not logical

If you weigh everything with an incorrectly calibrated scale, you will always be off by the same amount. Millions of years are asumed by the dating methods, not proven by them.

Note: Carbon dating isn't used for "millions of years." There are other methods (Potassium-argon dating, for example) but the C-14 dacays too rapidly for anything more than a few thousand years.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dating.asp
173 posted on 03/24/2005 2:15:53 PM PST by Gil4 (Home is where the Air Force sends me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
So those of us that believe in Biblical Creation believe that the bible specifically says that the whole universe is 6000 years old.

Well, no. Even you don't believe the Bible specifically says that. SInce much of it was written down a bit under 2000 years ago, if it said the earth was 6000 years old then, it would now be 8000 years old, wouldn't it?

What you mean is that you can add up a bunch of ages in the Bible, moving back from historical time, and end up with a date of creation of about 6000 years b.p..

Of course, it doesn't matter, because no one with a lick of sense would believe Methuselah lived 900 years anyway.

174 posted on 03/24/2005 2:19:06 PM PST by Right Wing Professor ((Math is hard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: msdrby

PING TO THE BOY


175 posted on 03/24/2005 2:24:37 PM PST by Professional Engineer (My baby girl has the strongest little finger known to man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gil4
Millions of years are asumed by the dating methods, not proven by them.

This is false. The rates of decay of radionuclides are measured, not assumed. Carbon-14 has been measured to have a half-life of 5700 years and change. We can measure carbon-14 contents of organic material that are 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, and so on of present values. These are therefore (approximately) 5,700, 11,400, and 17,100 year old. You'll notice the last two already make the biblical chronology impossible. We can cross-check carbon-14 dates against the growth rings of trees, either living trees or wood of known historical age. We can also overlap growth ring patterns of living and older wood samples, and establish a growth ring chronology that is older than 6000 years. While carbon-14 is pretty useless for materials of older geological ages, it's plenty good enough to disprove the age of the Earth claimed by biblical literalists. But then, anyone who says he believes the Earth is 6000 years old is either pig-ignorant, a credulous fool, or lying.

176 posted on 03/24/2005 2:32:55 PM PST by Right Wing Professor ((Math is hard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"Either fossilization is an unusual event, leading to a fragmentary record, or not.

OK, you win. How bizarre that we would point out that you have no evidence. What were we thinking? Evolution is true because you say so. It must be true, because we exist don't we, nevermind the gaps.

Fossilzation is indeed an unusual event. It's usually due to a water or volcanic activity event which buries an organism before the natural scavengers have a chance to break it down and destroy it.

Some of the dinosaur graveyards are indicative of water events of truly phenomenal porportions. (Now where have I heard of a truly phenomenal water event before?)

177 posted on 03/24/2005 2:34:31 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
The dinosaur was about 18 years old when it died.

At least that is what was on it's drivers license!

178 posted on 03/24/2005 2:35:32 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sender

"Can I pet him"?


"Sure; he's a vegetarian."


179 posted on 03/24/2005 2:37:31 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Do you know what's harder than getting a pregnant T-Rex in the sewer?


Getting a T-Rex pregnant in the sewer!


180 posted on 03/24/2005 2:40:30 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 481-492 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson