Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Einstein right when he said he was wrong?
PhysOrg.com ^ | 16 March 2005 | Staff

Posted on 03/16/2005 11:59:50 AM PST by PatrickHenry

Why is the universe expanding at an accelerating rate, spreading its contents over ever greater dimensions of space? An original solution to this puzzle, certainly the most fascinating question in modern cosmology, was put forward by four theoretical physicists, Edward W. Kolb of the U.S. Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Chicago (USA): Sabino Matarrese of the University of Padova; Alessio Notari from the University of Montreal (Canada); and Antonio Riotto of INFN (Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare) of Padova (Italy). Their study was submitted yesterday to the journal Physical Review Letters.

Over the last hundred years, the expansion of the universe has been a subject of passionate discussion, engaging the most brilliant minds of the century. Like his contemporaries, Albert Einstein initially thought that the universe was static: that it neither expanded nor shrank. When his own Theory of General Relativity clearly showed that the universe should expand or contract, Einstein chose to introduce a new ingredient into his theory. His "cosmological constant" represented a mass density of empty space that drove the universe to expand at an ever-increasing rate.

When in 1929 Edwin Hubble proved that the universe is in fact expanding, Einstein repudiated his cosmological constant, calling it "the greatest blunder of my life." Then, almost a century later, physicists resurrected the cosmological constant in a variant called dark energy. In 1998, observations of very distant supernovae demonstrated that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. This accelerating expansion seemed to be explicable only by the presence of a new component of the universe, a "dark energy," representing some 70 percent of the total mass of the universe. Of the rest, about 25 percent appears to be in the form of another mysterious component, dark matter; while only about 5 percent comprises ordinary matter, those quarks, protons, neutrons and electrons that we and the galaxies are made of.

"The hypothesis of dark energy is extremely fascinating," explains Padova's Antonio Riotto, "but on the other hand it represents a serious problem. No theoretical model, not even the most modern, such as supersymmetry or string theory, is able to explain the presence of this mysterious dark energy in the amount that our observations require. If dark energy were the size that theories predict, the universe would have expanded with such a fantastic velocity that it would have prevented the existence of everything we know in our cosmos."

The requisite amount of dark energy is so difficult to reconcile with the known laws of nature that physicists have proposed all manner of exotic explanations, including new forces, new dimensions of spacetime, and new ultralight elementary particles. However, the new report proposes no new ingredient for the universe, only a realization that the present acceleration of the universe is a consequence of the standard cosmological model for the early universe: inflation.

"Our solution to the paradox posed by the accelerating universe," Riotto says, "relies on the so-called inflationary theory, born in 1981. According to this theory, within a tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang, the universe experienced an incredibly rapid expansion. This explains why our universe seems to be very homogeneous. Recently, the Boomerang and WMAP experiments, which measured the small fluctuations in the background radiation originating with the Big Bang, confirmed inflationary theory.

It is widely believed that during the inflationary expansion early in the history of the universe, very tiny ripples in spacetime were generated, as predicted by Einstein's theory of General Relativity. These ripples were stretched by the expansion of the universe and extend today far beyond our cosmic horizon, that is over a region much bigger than the observable universe, a distance of about 15 billion light years. In their current paper, the authors propose that it is the evolution of these cosmic ripples that increases the observed expansion of the universe and accounts for its acceleration.

"We realized that you simply need to add this new key ingredient, the ripples of spacetime generated during the epoch of inflation, to Einstein's General Relativity to explain why the universe is accelerating today," Riotto says. "It seems that the solution to the puzzle of acceleration involves the universe beyond our cosmic horizon. No mysterious dark energy is required."

Fermilab's Kolb called the authors' proposal the most conservative explanation for the accelerating universe. "It requires only a proper accounting of the physical effects of the ripples beyond our cosmic horizon," he said.

Data from upcoming experiments will allow cosmologists to test the proposal. "Whether Einstein was right when he first introduced the cosmological constant, or whether he was right when he later refuted the idea will soon be tested by a new round of precision cosmological observations," Kolb said. "New data will soon allow us to distinguish between our explanation for the accelerated expansion of the universe and the dark energy solution."

INFN (Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare), Italy's national nuclear physics institute, supports, coordinates and carries out scientific research in subnuclear, nuclear and astroparticle physics and is involved in developing relevant technologies.

Fermilab, in Batavia, Illinois, USA, is operated by Universities Research Association, Inc. for the Department of Energy's Office of Science, which funds advanced research in particle physics and cosmology.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bigbang; cosmology; darkenergy; einstein; einsteinhoax; hoax; physics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
Underlining and bold font added by your humble poster.
1 posted on 03/16/2005 11:59:51 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Science Ping! An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added/dropped.

2 posted on 03/16/2005 12:01:08 PM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry


The universe is expanding.
...What is that your business!
3 posted on 03/16/2005 12:02:38 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Ripples, believe it or not.


4 posted on 03/16/2005 12:05:37 PM PST by razoroccam (Then in the name of Allah, they will let loose the Germs of War (http://www.booksurge.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"...relies on the so-called inflationary theory, born in 1981..."
Of course, formulated just after Carter inflation. But hasn't Paul Volker disproved it?
5 posted on 03/16/2005 12:05:38 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Proposals to name the phenomenon the "Pagan Pink Ripple" effect are still under consideration.
6 posted on 03/16/2005 12:06:20 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Einstein was one of the three greatest thinkers of the 20th century. The list could be expanded a little by adding Heidegger. Einstein, Heisenberg, Goedel, Heidegger. Two of them Nazis. The other two fleeing Nazism.


7 posted on 03/16/2005 12:06:48 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


8 posted on 03/16/2005 12:09:56 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

This expansion must be stopped. It's for the children.


9 posted on 03/16/2005 12:10:48 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Okay, you evolved. I was created. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

"...the ripples of spacetime generated during the epoch of inflation" are clearly the fault of G. W. Bush.


10 posted on 03/16/2005 12:11:10 PM PST by mad puppy ( "He's with me!" And I'm with W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Do you think this might have something to do with what we humans -- being at the center of the Universe as we are -- are able to observe? That is, that as we observe more widely and in detail that provokes certain changes in the very physics of the Universe?
11 posted on 03/16/2005 12:11:40 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I thought I'd made a mistake last year, but I was wrong.


12 posted on 03/16/2005 12:12:07 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam
Ripples, believe it or not.

As long as it's not ruffles I'll go along with it. But, I steadfastly refuse to live in a universe that has ruffles or fringes........Pleats are okay, though.....

13 posted on 03/16/2005 12:13:21 PM PST by Red Badger (The South seceded over refusal to end slavery. Blue states want to secede for the same reason......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Whatever the universe is expanding into must therefore be getting smaller not that it helps the situation here any....


14 posted on 03/16/2005 12:16:30 PM PST by Lee Heggy (Sorry, I don't do Windows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Data from upcoming experiments will allow cosmologists to test the proposal.

That's what I like to hear.

My pet idea is that the "big rip" that destroys the universe simply serves as the inflationary phase of the universe that follows it.

15 posted on 03/16/2005 12:17:50 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; VadeRetro
"If dark energy were the size that theories predict, the universe would have expanded with such a fantastic velocity that it would have prevented the existence of everything we know in our cosmos."

If only the evolutionary sciences were as honest as astrophysics in acknowledging areas where they don't have a clue.

Meanwhile, that expansion either occurred in the past or continues to occur is not too much of a surprise...

Isaiah 44:24 - Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;

Isaiah 45:12 - I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.

Isaiah 51:13 - And forgettest the LORD thy maker, that hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth; and hast feared continually every day because of the fury of the oppressor, as if he were ready to destroy? and where is the fury of the oppressor?

16 posted on 03/16/2005 12:18:38 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

How about ruffles that have ridges in them?


17 posted on 03/16/2005 12:19:45 PM PST by razoroccam (Then in the name of Allah, they will let loose the Germs of War (http://www.booksurge.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

Women and minorities hardest hit.


18 posted on 03/16/2005 12:24:25 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Meanwhile, that expansion either occurred in the past or continues to occur is not too much of a surprise...

Why do I suspect that if the 1998 observations had shown the expansion of the universe slowing down, you'd have a Bible verse or two predicting that? If the observations had shown a contraction, that would have been OK too. There's something in there, somewhere.

19 posted on 03/16/2005 12:25:53 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
There's something in there, somewhere.

If all of science is already in there, you'd expect them to be a bit more welcoming to our belated discovery of what they say they've always known.

20 posted on 03/16/2005 12:29:10 PM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson