Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Haus says the most common way engaged men plan for the worst is by setting up a savings account in the name of a relative they trust who has had a long, sound marriage so their funds will be safe. This way once the joint assets are divided after a divorce, they will have a little something extra to fall back on.

1 posted on 03/16/2005 3:28:28 AM PST by MississippiMasterpiece
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: MississippiMasterpiece

A better way is to create a separate IRA or 401K account, contribute to it while single, then stop contributing completely before being married... then it will grow and it is never commingled into the assets.


2 posted on 03/16/2005 3:34:24 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

I can understand getting a prenup or postnup. It's like fire insurance...you hope to never need it, but it's there if you do. And it's done with the knowledge and consent of both parties.

I cannot imagine being so cynical about marriage and about my future spouse that I'd do something like this! I'm getting married next month and if I discovered my husband did something like this I'd be livid.

What's so bad about expecting to be the one with a "long, sound marriage"?


4 posted on 03/16/2005 3:44:53 AM PST by Rubber_Duckie_27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

My solution is this: Know who you're getting married to, and if you have any doubts like this, don't get married.


5 posted on 03/16/2005 3:56:14 AM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Sounds pretty good to me. Instead of all of those self-help books and marriage counseling, there should be some classes on how men can keep some their money.


6 posted on 03/16/2005 3:56:18 AM PST by r5boston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

For those who don't know, the "Hoosier Gazette" is kind of a local version of "The Onion". Not quite as funny for non-Hoosiers who don't always get the in-State jokes.


7 posted on 03/16/2005 3:57:08 AM PST by 12B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Been married 42 years, Long enough to know the basic principals of marriage are love and trust.
How can anyone trust a person who has secretly salted away funds for a divorce. My advice is if you dont trust the woman you are marrying , dont marry her.

Never , ever let a good piece of tail enter your thoughts of marriage. too many men think with the little head. Marriage is a lot more than sex.


10 posted on 03/16/2005 4:02:53 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

This is always a good idea. State laws vary but a good rule of thumb is to assume all you aquire before is yours and ANYTHING after the marriage is 1/2 exposed to a claim.

Simply not co mingling is no protection (particularly in community property states). Pension funds are subject to QDRO orders which divide the increase of the pension during the course of the marriage.

Of course it is still the story that men do not claim against the woman's assets. You should see the shock in a womans face when she realizes the pension fund she built up at the expense of her soontobeexehusband is only 1/2 hers. Men are only now realizing they do have rights during the marriage and women are realizing that playing fast and loose with information can not work against a forensic accountant.


12 posted on 03/16/2005 4:11:54 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Jennifer Tilly, where are you when we need you.


13 posted on 03/16/2005 4:11:54 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece; ikka
The high percentage of marriages that end in divorce has created a new trend; many men are planning financially for their divorce before they even get married.

It doesn't matter - she'll still get a least half...

15 posted on 03/16/2005 4:13:33 AM PST by Libloather (Start Hillary's recount now - just to get it out of the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
It's understandable but I suspect it will become a self fulfilling prophecy. It's not the proper attitude to have when embarking on a marriage. It's too bad that energy isn't directed into making sure this is the right female and making it work.
17 posted on 03/16/2005 4:13:56 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Haus says the most common way engaged men plan for the worst is by setting up a savings account in the name of a relative they trust who has had a long, sound marriage so their funds will be safe.

Man, you'd better trust that relative and HIS wife.

21 posted on 03/16/2005 4:25:15 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

...just one of the symptoms of a bad attitude going in.


22 posted on 03/16/2005 4:25:50 AM PST by Banjoguy (Don't be brain dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
I presume woman are doing this too. Keeping secrets can be a two-way street.

I realize most states require that insurance policies cover only fortuitious events, but I wonder how long before it comes to "divorce insurance." In fact, I wonder if Rush Limbaugh has such coverage....though he is a very high risk.....

27 posted on 03/16/2005 4:37:14 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Not only a prenup be good but possible setup your assets in a trust to where she cannot get access to it. A trust is not for executives/elite only but can be used by ordinary people as well. I'm divorced myself and if I get married again, I will do these items.


29 posted on 03/16/2005 4:40:40 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Foreign assets are not subject to divorce judgements.


BUMP

31 posted on 03/16/2005 4:43:08 AM PST by tm22721
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Heck, these men aren’t getting good advice. They should be advised to setup offshore foundations. In those foundations they can place their house, cars, bank accounts, clothes, etc., and nobody will be able to touch it or claim it but the individual. In these offshore foundations, the person can leave a last will and testament and/or instructions dictating to whom and how his possessions should be distributed should he become incapacitated (mentally) or die. Also, their names do not appear in any public document; therefore, nothing can be traced to the “owner.”


42 posted on 03/16/2005 4:58:34 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

The solution: lacking adultery or abuse, or any other serious deformity in the marriage, the suing spouse gets nothing: no kids, no money, no assets. Someone wants out of marriage for personal convenience, go out on his/her own. In other words, do away with no-fault divorce.


47 posted on 03/16/2005 5:02:50 AM PST by wiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

“Let’s face it,” added Haus, “The man is the one who almost always get screwed over when a divorce occurs. Even though he usually made more money than the woman in the marriage, he loses the house, and ends up paying child support since the woman will get custody of their offspring. This new trend just provides him with a little insurance so he can enjoy a decent standard of living.”


Yes, the woman makes out like a bandit. Typically in her mid-thirties with a couple of kids -- now there's the kind of hot prospect guys are looking to date/marry.


49 posted on 03/16/2005 5:06:19 AM PST by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Louisiana had the best marriage law but it was changed.
When a man married he was in charge of all assets.
There were several cases where a man would marry a woman who had property and would take out large mortgages on the property.
The money would be put in hidden accounts and he would get a divorce.
The property was the womens but she was stuck with the mortgage payments.
70 posted on 03/16/2005 5:40:10 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (When you compromise with evil, evil wins. AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

question:
say a parent sets up a trust fund for their child as beneficiary and when they are old enough they can administer it as well. the child gets married and some time later gets divorced. Does the other spouse get half the trust fund? I mean isn't that how the wealthy protect their estates for their children.


74 posted on 03/16/2005 5:49:48 AM PST by Texas Patriot (Remember.... The Alamo, never forget HOORAHH!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson