Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good read.
1 posted on 03/05/2005 4:44:09 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: freespirited

Motherhood and apple pie.
2 posted on 03/05/2005 4:56:36 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

One-sixteenth blood quantum. My kids are more than that.

Protecting the faux-Indian Ward Churchill's right to opinion is one thing. Demanding that we respect his opinion is another thing entirely. Better that the University professors should be defending Adolf Hitler.

Odious and offensive are not mitigated by coming from a different source.


3 posted on 03/05/2005 4:57:51 PM PST by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
I'm surprised he didn't link to the Emma Perez piece in Counterpunch. It's hilarious -- paranoid, rambling, barely literate.

I'm less offended by what these bozos say (let's face it, there have always been people willing to say the most offensive thing that pops into their heads for the shock value) than by their appalling ignorance and lack of scholarship. This woman is stupid, and she's a department chair.

4 posted on 03/05/2005 4:59:36 PM PST by prion (Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

I started watching the video. I have to go do something else, but I must see the rest. If you are looking for amusement this evening, I recommend this video just based on what I have seen so far.


5 posted on 03/05/2005 5:00:13 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Ward Churchill makes the case for lobotomies...

7 posted on 03/05/2005 5:05:49 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Freedom. Brought to you by the grace of God and the Red, White and Blue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
hebephrenic: From hebephrenia, a form of schizophrenia "characterized by incoherence, delusions lacking an underlying theme, and affect that is flat, inappropriate, or silly".

Democrat: a form of schizophrenia "characterized by incoherence, delusions lacking an underlying theme, and affect that is flat, inappropriate, or silly"

Amazing how the two definitions are exactly the same!

8 posted on 03/05/2005 5:06:31 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
No comment ..... but that tenured, phony, traitor sack-of manure reminds me of this not so golden oldie:


11 posted on 03/05/2005 5:24:22 PM PST by Tuba Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

"For all I know or care, I'm one-sixteenth Cherokee myself, but it seems fairly certain that Ward Churchill is not, or he would have been able to prove it by now."

LOL, this WAS a good read!


15 posted on 03/05/2005 5:34:06 PM PST by jocon307 (Vote George Washington for the #1 spot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
Why am I even reading about nuts like this in this forum. By writing about idiots like this guy you are playing right into their game and giving them the exposure they so desire. Lets ignore him and believe me he will go away. He has no following whatsoever but if he continues to receive notice from the likes of the writers to this forum he will.

Squire Eaton
17 posted on 03/05/2005 5:45:30 PM PST by Squire Eaton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Doesn't it seem like the liberals/Democrats are running their own reality television program on who the Most Dysfunctional Person in America is?


22 posted on 03/05/2005 6:37:37 PM PST by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
Average Democratic voters are almost certainly appalled by creeps like Churchill — which is why they won't remain Democratic voters indefinitely.

The Democrats have had spokepeople of Chuchill's ilk since at least as far back as 1972. Any voter that hasn't left the party in that period isn't likely to because of the latest nut on the scene.

24 posted on 03/05/2005 6:41:23 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

It's probably to our advantage for Churchill to contine spewing his venom, since the more he does and is defended by academia in doing it, the more liberal academia proves itself to be totally corrupt and hypocritical. After all, in the long run the observed excesses of Michael Moore and the MSM were major reasons we won the 2004 election.


27 posted on 03/05/2005 7:44:43 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson