Posted on 03/04/2005 12:10:40 AM PST by ajolympian2004
Ping. I'm thinking again, about who-all was at the WEF, JJ. There would have to be spiders and crawlers creeping through the internet to determine whether one's private email or blog or website was "politically oriented".
And to hear the left gnash its teeth over, say, the Patriot Act. To hear them screech about the "vast right wing conspiracy".
No doubts, there are other parts of McCain-Feingold -- yet to be releashed. Let's see, McCain says he wants to see local TV/Radio stations be FORCED to air (at their own cost) "chump change" candidates. So, in this case, does this mean that the Stations has to give the appearance of "supporting" the candidate? And therefore pay a charge?
Will those bloggers and emailer who are supporting a "chump change" candidate be FREED from this newer-proposed fees via McCain-Feingold?
And mine. I suspect the Pubbies know better than to shoot the ones who sent them to the dance.
Not gonna happen. The right, left, center, and extremists on all sides will not tolerate it.
Damn that reprehensible supreme supremist court for upholding MFCFR! It's 100% blatently unconstitutional, based on 5 little words... "Congress shall make no law." What part of that doesn't the supremist court understand, when "applying the Constitution to laws?"
It's amazing how the supremist court is able to find all sorts of rights that aren't enumerated in the Constitution (and I agree 100% with the 9th and 10th Amendments, don't get me wrong here), but when a right is specifically enumerated, they say, "Nahhhh... That's not really important, and it doesn't really mean what it spells out..." That's one of the reasons I'm scared to death of the supremist court getting a hold of the Second Amendment...
The supremist court is like a rogue elephant, running rampant across the fields of our government, supplanting the Republic style of government with their own decrees.!
Mark
That wasn't evident during the campaign, when they unleashed McCain for his vitriol against the Swift Vets and POWs. That wasn't evident when they started talking 'domestic partners' weeks before voters in eleven states voted against 'gay marriage'. If that was all at the leading of 'boy genius', Karl 'amnesty' Rove, why would anything be different, now, particularly as Pres. Bush is NOT running again? Remember, it was Ann C., on a 'blog' in a way, who coined this term for Rove - 'boy genius'. Rove probably wishes PLB and LGF and the rest would just - go away.
I don't think he gets it any more than those Dem that want to extend such legislation to get only the conservative bloggers. Could I be wrong about the guy, on this? I sure do hope so.
Time for a little historical review, on just WHAT this guy did and didn't do during the war. And it's time to have a second look at this poser's record in Congress. He's an embarrassment to the GOP, no question.
Good point. Thanks.
Is there a better expression than "we got" here? Ed Asner used those words in talking about Rush Limbaugh's drug problem. I'd prefer to say that we helped expose the bias and deceipt practiced by Rather and Jordan. They got themselves. Any other suggestions?
No joke - and a small voice in the back of my head says that was the idea all along.
I'm calling my representitive and both Senators today! I urge all of you to do the same. Someone needs to reign in the FEC, and this McCain-Feingold nonsense bill needs to go the way of the dinosaur!
First amendment ping
Did we achieve EVERYTHING we'd hoped to achieve? Nope, not even close . . . but it's easier to change the minds of like-minded individuals than it is to change the minds of no-brains Liberals. We just have to slowly but surely keep reeling in the Republican "mavericks" . . . but we can't toss out the entire Cherry Pie just because a few of them aren't yet ripe.
We Conservatives have fought for my entire life to become the Majority Party. Sadly, we've had to make some sacrifices to achieve our goal . . . but we're there now.
Now we can start fine-tuning our political machine to "sterilize" those political prostitutes who would sell their souls to be reelected. But we have the numbers to do it now. We can pick off the RINOs one at a time and not suffer a major blow. When we pick off enough of them, eventually, the others will get the message.
We pick the most egregious ones first . . . but even then we shouldn't pick any ONE offense to be our rallying cry . . . like the abortion debate. For example, Let's say Senator A is Pro-Choice but he toes the line on the other Conservative Causes. Senator B is Pro-Life but he's anti-military, favors Big Government, and believes in gun control.
Abortion seems to ALWAYS be the hot button for us conservatives . . . and I'm as devoutly Pro-Life as anyone else . . . but I suggest this. Senator B's "over-all" failings are far, far worse than Senator A's . . . and could even, in the long run, cost more lives. Our enemies know not to challenge us because we have the world's greatest Armed Forces. If we allowed this to slide, Americans could become sitting ducks.
So, while I agree with the tenor of your comments, I humbly suggest, yes, they need to be corrected . . . but they need to be corrected with an over-all strategy in mind and not just pick one single Hot-Button as the catalyst.
I've waited fifty-one years for us to become the Majority Party . . . surely we can show a bit of patience with the 5-10% of the Republican Politicos who don't "toe-the-line" of our Conservative Agenda. Patient does not mean complacent, however, and that's very important. We've got them in our sights . . . let's just pick them off one at a time while in the meantime we still get 80-90% of our agenda approved.
bump
I like my friend Phibian's idea.
http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/2005/03/vampire-vampire-vampire-coming.html
When do we march. Captain Ed can gather the Pajama clad VRRC, can Kos can get the Moonbats.
We just need a date. Once a ruling is made? May 1st?
More important, where do we meet for drinks before and after the march?
bump / ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.