Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ajolympian2004
You know, if the FEC were around in the early 1770's, "Poor Richard's Almanac" would have been against the law!

Damn that reprehensible supreme supremist court for upholding MFCFR! It's 100% blatently unconstitutional, based on 5 little words... "Congress shall make no law." What part of that doesn't the supremist court understand, when "applying the Constitution to laws?"

It's amazing how the supremist court is able to find all sorts of rights that aren't enumerated in the Constitution (and I agree 100% with the 9th and 10th Amendments, don't get me wrong here), but when a right is specifically enumerated, they say, "Nahhhh... That's not really important, and it doesn't really mean what it spells out..." That's one of the reasons I'm scared to death of the supremist court getting a hold of the Second Amendment...

The supremist court is like a rogue elephant, running rampant across the fields of our government, supplanting the Republic style of government with their own decrees.!

Mark

27 posted on 03/04/2005 4:06:52 AM PST by MarkL (That which does not kill me, has made the last mistake it will ever make!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MarkL

...That's one of the reasons I'm scared to death of the supremist court getting a hold of the Second Amendment...


I'm not. Sometimes people get what they want, and they also end up getting what they deserve.


42 posted on 03/04/2005 7:15:32 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson