Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homeschooling Under Fire in 2005 Legislative Sessions
HSLDA ^ | HSLDA

Posted on 02/09/2005 8:20:55 AM PST by hsmomx3

Homeschoolers in several states are faced with aggressive attempts to take away their freedom. HSLDA and homeschool families are fighting back.

The majority of state legislatures have started their 2005 session, and not surprisingly the regulation of homeschooling has been a hot issue. Several states have introduced bills that would restrict the freedom to homeschool.

Attempts to Impose State Assessments on Homeschools For example, both New Mexico and South Dakota filed bills that would force homeschool students to take state-selected standardized tests in the public school or under the supervision of a certified teacher. These bills violate a federal prohibition in the No Child Left Behind Act that forbids states to require homeschoolers to take the state assessment.

Unlimited State Powers Over Homeschoolers New Jersey introduced a bill in 2004 that would give the state Board of Education virtually unlimited power to impose new restrictions on homeschoolers, force homeschoolers to take a state assessment based on public school curriculum and turn over private medical information to the public schools. The bill was defeated last year after hundreds of homeschoolers and HSLDA staged large rallies at the Capitol in opposition. It has been reintroduced at the beginning of the 2005 legislative season. HSLDA and New Jersey homeschoolers will fight hard to stop this bill.

Worst Bill of the Decade After Democrats took control of the House, Senate, and Governorship in Montana, a long-time anti-homeschool Senator filed one of the harshest bills we have seen for a long time. The bill would transform one of the best homeschool laws in the nation to one of the worst. It would require that homeschools be supervised by a certified teacher and monitored bi-annually by the school district. Among other restrictions, it would even prohibit the homeschooling of any child with developmental disabilities in spite of HSLDA studies proving that special needs students learn better in a homeschool setting. It also prohibits homeschooling by stepparents and legal guardians!

HSLDA Attorney Dee Black is working closely with Steve White head of the Montana Coalition of Homeschoolers to stop this bill. Dee plans to testify against this terrible bill in committee on Monday, February 14.

An Attempt to Turn Back the Clock An Oregon Senate bill turns the clock back by requiring families to submit a yearly notice and standardized test results to their local school district. The legislature had previously removed these requirements from the law. HSLDA Attorney Thomas Schmidt is working with the state homeschool association OCEAN to defeat this bill.

Attempts to Expand Jurisdiction over Homeschoolers Besides these legislative challenges, families are also facing major expansion of state jurisdiction over their children in Michigan, Wyoming, Hawaii, Colorado, Indiana, New Jersey, and Iowa. All seven of these states have introduced one or more bills expanding the compulsory attendance age in the state, thus requiring parents to comply with school regulations for longer periods of time. The goal of the teachers unions is to lower the mandatory school age to three years of age and raise it to at least 18 years old.

Believe it or not, Indiana has a bill to require children to be in school until 19 years of age!

HSLDA Legislative Team Our legal legislative team at HSLDA, headed by Senior Counsel Chris Klicka, is made up of five lawyers and six legal assistants. They are actively working around the clock to defeat all of these restrictive homeschool bills and continue to monitor hundreds of bills in all 50 states. They are also working on promoting many bills that will advance homeschool freedoms.

South Dakota Restrictive Bill Defeated The first restrictive homeschool bill to fail was in South Dakota. In below zero temperatures, Attorney Scott Woodruff traveled to South Dakota in mid-January to testify against the testing bill. He pointed out that it violated both federal law and a parent's right to direct their children's education. Hundreds of homeschoolers attended the hearing, which helped clinch the victory. The committee unanimously voted against the bill!

We stand ready to take similar action in other states to ensure that homeschool freedom is protected.

Remember, we need you to stand with us in order to fight these battles for homeschool freedoms. Without your membership, we could not exist. Thank you for your continued support!

As Benjamin Franklin once said, "We must all hang together or, most assuredly, we will all hang separately!"


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: homeschooling; homeschoollist; hslda; legislation; pspl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Ingtar
Homeschoolers are at a disadvantage in state tests.

I'll agree with you, but not for the reason you suspect. Here in Massachusetts, a lot of the programs I encounter (I'm a tutor and Math SAT prepper) are geared toward specifically one goal....success on the state tests.

Now, the Republican fave Governor Romney, came up with a new wrinkle...anyone who scores in the top 20%ile gets free tuition at state colleges...all levels. That would mean that students who don't take those tests, like private school students (home study, too?) lose that advantage.

I take that to be a devious way to destroy non-public education.

41 posted on 02/10/2005 1:33:47 PM PST by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: grania

Isn't this the same governor who might run for President?


42 posted on 02/10/2005 1:39:37 PM PST by hsmomx3 (Steelers in '06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Maybe if HSLDA wasn't legally incompetant, I'd care what they had to say.

They're con artists, pure and simple.

43 posted on 02/10/2005 1:41:49 PM PST by jude24 ("To go against conscience is neither right nor safe." - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Maybe if HSLDA wasn't legally incompetant, I'd care what they had to say.

They're con artists, pure and simple.

44 posted on 02/10/2005 1:41:49 PM PST by jude24 ("To go against conscience is neither right nor safe." - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Powder..Patch..Ball FIRE!

Maybe if HSLDA wasn't legally incompetant, I'd care what they had to say.
They're con artists, pure and simple.

If you knew what you were talking about and could spell maybe we would care what you had to say.

45 posted on 02/10/2005 1:46:27 PM PST by BallandPowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Isn't this the same governor who might run for President?

It is. And, this program is very popular with wealthy decision makers. High test scores correlate very highly with living in a wealthy community, where less resources have to be used getting the educationally needy to pass.

He's giving his well-heeled friends free tuition for their kids at UMass Amherst. The tradeoff?....gonna have to forsake that non-public education to take the test.

Keep a very close eye on Romney. I'm not in the fan club, but I haven't tossed away the application, either.

46 posted on 02/10/2005 1:47:06 PM PST by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tfecw
Home school seems like the way to go when i have kids. I know i could handle math and science and Literature, but the history, english, foreign languages ect i wouldn't be able to do.

For most home schoolers, the primary focus is on character. Once the children master self-discipline, the rest is easy. After they learn to read, they can pretty well educate themselves, if given a little guidance, encouragement, direction, and feedback. We purchased specialized classes for our oldest two kids at a local cafeteria-style school sponsored by our church (www.kpic.org) in english lit, physics, and chemistry. they're dean's list students at the public school they finally started attending, NC State University.

47 posted on 02/10/2005 1:47:33 PM PST by TomSmedley (Calvinist, optimist, home schooling dad, exuberant husband, technical writer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BallandPowder
If you knew what you were talking about

Trust me. I know what I'm talking about. I'm intimately familiar with a case they bungled. They left a defendant off their complaint - a defendant a first year law student would realize should be included - and therefore left my best friend with no legal remedy.

and could spell

Yeah, sure. No one else ever misspells around here.

48 posted on 02/10/2005 1:50:27 PM PST by jude24 ("To go against conscience is neither right nor safe." - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
wording was psychobabble and confusing

I believe these tests also mention names and alleged achievements of obscure (and totally irrelevant) figures who the teaching establishment have deemed to be central to American history as part of the political correctness cirriculum.

They have also elevated half-baked left-wing authors to Godhood status in English.

They preach lies, for example, on the creator, creation and true meaning of Kwanzaa. They also worship Martin Luther King by omitting key elements of his life and key facts about many of his associates.

They are teaching students in civics that is their duty as citizens to seek "progressive social change through activism", code words for supporting politically correct left-wing issues and values. (Examples: support of abortion, homosexuality, wacko environmentalism, socialist regulatory and tax schemes).

The fundamental lie taught to kids in the public schools is that they are not sovereign individuals and members of sovereign families but are mere pawns to be manipulated by society and the state.

To test home school students to determine if they have received the required leftist indoctrination is obscene.
49 posted on 02/10/2005 1:56:10 PM PST by cgbg (Come die in Seattle--your vote will still count!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
To test home school students to determine if they have received the required leftist indoctrination is obscene

How about testing home school students to determine that they're literate?   Like, there's good home schoolers and bad ones just like there're good private schools and bad ones.

50 posted on 02/10/2005 4:15:48 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

It sounds like it would be best for everyone if you put your children back in public school and stopped pretending you're homeschooling. The only common ground between homeschooling and what you're doing is that you do your thing in your house.


51 posted on 02/10/2005 4:22:50 PM PST by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has never led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Thanks for posting this. It really shows how desparate and afraid the left and the elitist educrats are. They are constantly being showed up by homeshcooled students and will try anything to stem the tide of people pulling their children out of the government institutions (a.k.a. "public schools").

I'm afraid this is only the beginning.

52 posted on 02/10/2005 4:27:32 PM PST by Pablo64 ("Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3; Nightshift

It shouldn't be such a battle after all the years that homeschoolers have proved themselves. The gov't system just can't stand it that they aren't in complete control of all kids. To start them at age 3 and want to keep them til age 19 isn't going to improve the gov't success with education.


53 posted on 02/10/2005 4:30:14 PM PST by tutstar ( <{{--->< http://ripe4change.4-all.org Violations of Florida Statutes ongoing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tfecw

Homeschooled kids in MA are not allowed to take the MCAS, even if they wanted to!


54 posted on 02/10/2005 4:32:54 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

LOL!


55 posted on 02/10/2005 4:33:52 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross (Just say no to the ACLU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
I have no problem testing for literacy, math skills, etc.

But if the tests are filled with leftist drivel, which is the case in many states, then I have a problem.
56 posted on 02/10/2005 4:47:54 PM PST by cgbg (Come die in Seattle--your vote will still count!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
...it would be best for everyone if you put your children back in public school and stopped pretending you're homeschooling....

I do apologize-- please don't take offense because it seems like I often say the wrong thing without knowing it because either I haven't attended homeschooling get-togethers regular enough, or I show up late.   But I really mean it when I say I'm not just one of them Christmas 'n Easter homeschoolers --I really got  homeschoolin' in my heart.   Not that I'm one of them text-book thumpin' homeschoolier than thou types. 

Wait, let me prove where I'm commin' from:

Gimme that oooold time homeschoolin' gimme that old time homeschoolin' gimme that....

57 posted on 02/10/2005 5:03:15 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
I'd say that you and I are on the same page in the hymnal (as it were).
58 posted on 02/10/2005 5:05:35 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

Ah, sarcasm. Good one.


59 posted on 02/10/2005 6:10:44 PM PST by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has never led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Thank you for spotting my sarcasm-- I didn't put in the < > tags because I couldn't remember the html code for the friendly kind of sarcasm as opposed to the malicious kind we seem to find so much around lately.

I prefer the friendly kind because (for obvious reasons) I need all the friends I can get :-S.

cheers

60 posted on 02/11/2005 10:18:41 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson