Skip to comments.
Iranian Alert - February 9, 2005 - "Tehran warns facilities indestructible"
Regime Change Iran ^
| 2/08/05
| freedom44
Posted on 02/08/2005 7:24:22 PM PST by freedom44
Top News Story
Iran warned the United States Tuesday that its nuclear sites cannot be destroyed by air or missile strikes, as Britain entered the fray by declaring that Tehran is a state sponsor of terrorism.
Top national security official Hassan Rowhani said on state television that a military strike would only push Iran's nuclear activities underground, and told Washington that the stand-off should be settled by dialogue.
"Our nuclear centers cannot be destroyed. Our nuclear technology comes from our scientists (and) we can transfer our nuclear workshops under mountains and carry out enrichment where no bomb or missile can be effective," said the cleric, adding he did not consider an attack as a "serious threat."
Rowhani, the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, insisted that Iran was "not looking for increased tensions with any country, even with the Americans."
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiran; alsadr; anniversary; armyofmahdi; axisofevil; axisofweasels; ayatollah; azadi; binladen; china; cleric; democracy; doyoufeelluckypunk; elbaradei; eu; freedom; freedomdeficit; germany; humanrights; iaea; insurgency; iran; iranianalert; iraq; irgc; iri; islam; islamicrepublic; japan; journalist; kazemi; khamenei; khatami; moqtadaalsadr; mullahs; muslims; persecution; persia; persian; politicalprisoners; protests; rafsanjani; regimechangeiran; revolutionaryguard; rumsfeld; russia; satellitetelephones; shiite; southasia; southwestasia; studentmovement; studentprotest; terrorism; terrorists; us; vevak; wot; zawahiri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
1
posted on
02/08/2005 7:24:22 PM PST
by
freedom44
To: freedom44
They must have a Bagdad Bob... maybe Tehran Teddy?
2
posted on
02/08/2005 7:25:13 PM PST
by
Barney59
(Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!)
To: freedom44
Starting to sound a lot like their old neighbors.
3
posted on
02/08/2005 7:27:42 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(they call me tater.)
To: freedom44
"Top national security official Hassan Rowhani said on state television that a military strike would only push Iran's nuclear activities underground, and told Washington that the stand-off should be settled by dialogue."
Sounds like someone needs a change of underwear.
4
posted on
02/08/2005 7:28:49 PM PST
by
yooper
(If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
To: freedom44
Make the whole area radioactive and it won't matter if they are "underground". May the peace of the grave be upon them.
5
posted on
02/08/2005 7:30:01 PM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: freedom44
Tehran warns facilities indestructibleNot what I'd call a safe bet.
6
posted on
02/08/2005 7:33:03 PM PST
by
dighton
To: freedom44
Me thinks the Iranians are going to be in for a nasty surprise very soon, courtesy of the IDF.
7
posted on
02/08/2005 7:34:44 PM PST
by
rdl6989
To: freedom44
Our nuclear centers cannot be destroyed. Our nuclear technology comes from our scientists (and) we can transfer our nuclear workshops under mountains and carry out enrichment where no bomb or missile can be effectiveAgainst US forces, a bunker is the ABSOLUTE WORST PLACE TO BE.
8
posted on
02/08/2005 7:36:02 PM PST
by
Paul_Denton
(The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN!)
To: cripplecreek
Just for the sake of argument, let's say Iran's nuke sites are invulnerable to conventional weapons or clandestine attacks. What are our options? With Russia rearing its head again in the Middle East, does the President still have any military options he can risk without the conflict becoming global.
9
posted on
02/08/2005 7:36:11 PM PST
by
buckalfa
To: buckalfa
It might be our only option to take that risk. We can risk the CHANCE of Russia entering the fray or allow the suicidal fanatics who rule Iran to get nukes and USE THEM.
10
posted on
02/08/2005 7:43:48 PM PST
by
Paul_Denton
(The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN!)
To: Paul_Denton
11
posted on
02/08/2005 7:46:30 PM PST
by
buckalfa
To: freedom44
Tehran warns facilities indestructible ...and what about Tehran itself?
12
posted on
02/08/2005 7:57:16 PM PST
by
TXnMA
(Attention, ACLU: There is no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
To: freedom44
Shiite head says..."Our nuclear centers cannot be destroyed. Our nuclear technology comes from our scientists (and) we can transfer our nuclear workshops under mountains and carry out enrichment where no bomb or missile can be effective,"
Hey mon...no problemo...we just fly the smart laser guided bunker buster bombs right in the front door.
If we cant get it...it means they cant get out.
13
posted on
02/08/2005 8:01:48 PM PST
by
Dat Mon
(will work for clever tagline)
To: freedom44
Wan't it John Kerry who warned that we were developing bunker busting nukes? Hmmm.
14
posted on
02/08/2005 8:02:34 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc sign, vinces †)
To: Barney59
Scientists can tell a mullah anything and he'll believe it. This article proves that.
15
posted on
02/08/2005 8:04:40 PM PST
by
JustaCowgirl
(You have seen that life is fragile, and evil is real, and courage triumphs -- George W Bush)
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
"Indestructable?"
I don't think so...
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
16
posted on
02/08/2005 8:08:23 PM PST
by
mhking
(Do not mess with dragons, for thou art crunchy & good with ketchup...)
To: freedom44
Israelis will take care of it.
17
posted on
02/08/2005 8:10:43 PM PST
by
Jedidah
To: freedom44
Hmmm.... said the cleric, adding he did not consider an attack as a "serious threat." Maybe this cleric ought to talk to Saddam- he didn't think we were a threat either.
18
posted on
02/08/2005 8:24:45 PM PST
by
joedelta
To: freedom44
General Patton: If oceans and mountains can be overcome, anything built by man can be overcome.
To: McGavin999; nuconvert; sionnsar; AdmSmith; parisa; onyx; Pro-Bush; Valin; Pan_Yans Wife; seamole; ..
20
posted on
02/08/2005 8:25:34 PM PST
by
F14 Pilot
(Democracy is a process not a product)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson