Posted on 02/06/2005 5:07:53 PM PST by nwrep
Terrorist supporter, freedom's parasite and anti-American anarchist Ward Churchill gave an interview to the Brooklyn-based "Satya" magazine. Here are some excerpts:
**************************************************************
This issue of Satya is trying to push the debate about whether or not violence is an appropriate means for a desired end. With animal activists, theres a growing gap between people who feel its not and others who feel that, for example, breaking into laboratories to liberate animals or burning down property is an effective way to stop abuse.
Well, thats an absurd framing in my view. Defining violence in terms of propertythat basically nullifies the whole notion that life is sacred. People who want to elevate property to the same level of importance as life are so absurd as to be self-nullifying.
.............
That brings me to one question, which is, in general, people like to think theyre pretty decent. They dont like to think of themselves as violent or complying with a system that is oppressive...
Heinrich Himmler viewed himself in exactly that way. He was a family man, he had high moral values, hed met his responsibilities, blah, blah, blaha good and decent man in his own mind.
Do you think that applies to most American people?
In the sense that it applied to most Germans [during the Third Reich].
..............
So if it takes eradication of the beast from within, how would you see that happening?
Well, first the withdrawal of consent, people imbued with consciousness to withdraw altogether from an embrace of the state.
If I defined the state as being the problem, just what happens to the state? Ive never fashioned myself to be a revolutionary, but its part and parcel of what Im talking about. You can create through consciousness a situation of flux, perhaps, in which something better can replace it. In instability theres potential. Thats about as far as I go with revolutionary consciousness. Im actually a de-evolutionary. I dont want other people in charge of the apparatus of the state as the outcome of a socially transformative process that replicates oppression. I want the state gone: transform the situation to U.S. out of North America. U.S. off the planet. Out of existence altogether.
Mental Ward...
look at how he is holding the kalishnikov.
by the magazine!
lol.
This is a sick and twisted man who should be fired and run out on a rail immediately. Here we are in the most free society on the planet and this piece of filth is preaching unmitigated hate on the taxpayer dime. He is the same as a Klansman.
After you, Ward pinko.....
Mark my words. He will either be incapabable of teaching or fired from the university within a month.
"Can we please please just IGNORE HIM?. If we had simply ignored this lunatic from the get-go, he would have been long forgotten by now. By giving this dim-witted liar a national forum, we only elevate his stature and invite similar losers to get easy press in the future. This buffoon is playing left against right for his own fun and profit, and stupidly, both sides are taking the bait."
Ignoring him is same as handing him the keys to our future.
We must shine the light of truth on communists like this, then even the blind can judge what he is.
Isn't it amazing how so many of these folks who express utter contempt for the US and its people live here? One wonders why they don't migrate to place that share their world view. Maybe its because, deep down, they realize they're completely full of sh!t and the facist/backward regimes they worship would eventually tire of them and hang their a$$es.
And what if they did?
What if all 3000 were the top 3000 capitalists on the planet?
The top 3000 in history?
What would that have to do with anything?
Well, he's certainly devolved.
I don't want him dead, I just want him to wish he were.
This should be a Fouth-Year Psychiatry final exam question:
What's the diagnosis?
As long as he's living on the public dole, preaching his poison to impressionable young adults, he cannot be ignored. He must instead be conquered.
That should be enough to imprision him.
Advocating the violent overthrow of the government is a crime, IIRC.
"Defining violence in terms of propertythat basically nullifies the whole notion that life is sacred. People who want to elevate property to the same level of importance as life are so absurd as to be self-nullifying."
So if destroying property to make a political point is OK, then it would be fine to burn down this guy's house and blow up his car? Somehow I don't think he'd see it in the same light... =)
Can it, Churchill! Who cares what you think?
I love- ABSOLUTELY LOVE when people BASH the whole foundation and the United States and then turn around and say "I'm a good American this is what this country was founded on"
Umm, this country wasn't founded under the principles of BASHING the foundation.
How about just exposing him to flesh-eating bacteria and letting nature take its course?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.