Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 'truth' about tobacco smoke
oakridger.com ^ | January 28, 2005 | Ellen Rogers

Posted on 01/28/2005 1:50:34 PM PST by SheLion

Just how harmful is environmental tobacco smoke?

Not as harmful as the Environmental Protection Agency or those anti-secondhand smoke commercials would have one believe, according to Roger A. Jenkins, Ph.D., consultant to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Chemical Sciences division.

Jenkins presented "Human Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Is What You See What You Get?" at ORNL this week.

"Some people wish I didn't have the findings I have," Jenkins said. "Others say, 'Gee, if this is true, why does the EPA continue to talk about this?' [The research] steps on people's toes, and that's exactly what I want it to do."

Environmental tobacco smoke is a highly diluted mixture of sidestream (70 to 90 percent) and exhaled mainstream (10 to 30 percent) of tobacco smoke.

"'Secondhand' smoke is probably misleading, since most ETS is derived from smoke which is emitted by the smoldering firecone of a cigarette," Jenkins said.

According to Jenkins, the typical smoker inhales 480 milligrams of smoke a day and 32 milligrams of nicotine per day. In a home where smoking is unrestricted, the typical non-smoker will inhale the equivalent of .45 milligrams of smoke particles and .028 milligrams of nicotine.

There are several science-related hurdles to overcome in educating the public about ETS, Jenkins said. The first is getting the public to understand the difference between personal beliefs and science.

"In a society where there are still serious debates about evolution, this can be a real challenge," he said.

The second is avoiding the "means justifying the end syndrome," which Jenkins says involves the distortion of science in the name of preventing youth from smoking.

The third major hurdle is demanding "public policy types" provide perspective for the facts they declare.

"Sure, there are 43 carcinogens (cancer-causing agents) in ETS, but there are also probably about 40 carcinogens in diesel exhaust and wood smoke," Jenkins said.

Indoor air pollution is also caused by many things other than non-tobacco sources, including cleaning, cooking, consumer products like Raid and wood burning.

"As (physician) Paracelsus said in the early 1500's, 'the poison is in the dose,'" Jenkins said. "We still continue to eat lettuce and take showers despite their carcinogens. Life is risky business."

Jenkins is simply remaining true to his profession by bringing forth this politically incorrect information, he says.

"When you start tinkering with science because you want to achieve some political aim, you are no longer a scientist."

Jenkins retired in September from his position as leader of the Environmental Chemistry and Mass Spectrometry Group in the Chemical Sciences Division at ORNL. He has authored or co-authored more than 45 open literature publications in the area of field analytical chemistry and tobacco smoke characterization and human exposure. He is the lead author of "The Chemistry of Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Composition and Measurement," Second Edition.

Jenkins has also acted as an expert witness in several high-profile litigations involving environmental and mainstream tobacco smoke composition and exposure


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: antismokers; bans; butts; cigarettes; fda; health; individualliberty; lawmakers; maine; niconazis; professional; prohibitionists; pufflist; regulation; rinos; senate; smoking; taxes; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-296 next last
To: SheLion

I'm astonished that someone would send a Freepmail like that.

Must be one of those very immature folks who is used to getting their own way and just can't discuss something without hurling out junior high school type insults.

Oh man,this entire thread has just made me want to light up----addictive behaviour,you know. LOL

Good night,She,and don't let the bastards get you down(as if they would).


181 posted on 01/28/2005 9:00:10 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I'll just try and keep toxic stuff out of my body period... tobacco, Tylenol, drugs, whatever.... cancer will bite you if you ain't watching out for yourself.
182 posted on 01/28/2005 9:02:04 PM PST by Porterville (Never compromise what is right. Take your time to insult a liberal or have one unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavychick

Your welcome! The things one learns from Readers Digest are diverse. Actually, I was surprised they printed it since they've gotten so PC.


183 posted on 01/28/2005 9:02:13 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Slippery, Slicktey, Slidey, Bumpus.....SNOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Smoking disfigures your body, from the inside out. Especially, the change in a womans skin, because she smokes, is apparent more than the woman cares to know. Interesting statistic: 9 out of 10 people who buy cigarettes at gas filling stations, are women; and among them, most do that buying on their way home from work; and after that, on their way out for the evening.

Not sure what point you are trying to make, but I am a smoker, and 48 years old. You are more than welcome to look at my picture on my profile here. I'm no beauty queen, but I've seen non-smoking women my age who look older than me.

That said, I would like to take everything out of my lifestyle that may be harmful to me. I'm a carb addict, and need to cut down on the pasta.

Just wondering, where did you find the stats about women buying cigarettes at gas stations after work? Source?

184 posted on 01/28/2005 9:14:39 PM PST by LisaMalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Agreed. The "health issues" regarding nonsmokers who are exposed to second hand smoke, is and always has been an egregious lie concocted to force smokers to quit.
185 posted on 01/28/2005 9:33:38 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH (I support Terri's supporters!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: qam1

They may look good, but they smell bad. Phew!


186 posted on 01/28/2005 9:36:57 PM PST by ru4liberty (I don't know what tomorrow holds, but I know Who holds tomorrow. May His Name ever be praised!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH
The "health issues" regarding nonsmokers who are exposed to second hand smoke, is and always has been an egregious lie concocted to force smokers to quit.

What about those who have pre-existing conditions that are aggravated by smoking? I'm not saying smoking should be banned, I just know people who have problems that can be aggravated by smoke. that doesn't necessarily back up the antis either, it's just you can't say that nobody is being harmed.

I don't smoke myself, and don't care for the smell, but it's one of those things that isn't harming me (and wasn't in the Constitution) so I say let people smoke.
187 posted on 01/28/2005 9:37:39 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Not as harmful as the Environmental Protection Agency or those anti-secondhand smoke commercials would have one believe...

Not as bad as the neighbors burning leaf pile, the exhaust from his car, the jet he rides in or coming from the smoke stack of the power plant that provides him electricity.

Everyone puts off second hand smoke. Some just choose to complain about someone else's and overlook their own.

188 posted on 01/28/2005 9:43:54 PM PST by BJungNan (National sale tax - end all this insane tax records paperwork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Bumpers.

FGS

189 posted on 01/28/2005 9:44:25 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Read post #12, my first on this thread. It admits to the concerns you addressed.

My post refers to the lie that second hand smoke causes cancer and other serious deseases in non-smokers.

190 posted on 01/28/2005 9:46:47 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH (I support Terri's supporters!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Thank you for the information. It should be past along to those who claim to have the allergy to smoke and have tried to guilt us with it for many years.

Are you a doctor?

191 posted on 01/28/2005 10:07:07 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH (I support Terri's supporters!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH

That should read, "my last post" and "diseases." My apologies.


192 posted on 01/28/2005 10:08:49 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH (I support Terri's supporters!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
All of my life, I have actually somewhat enjoyed second hand smoke.

You sound like my daughter. She smoked for years and never got the habit. She smoked about a half pack a day but she quit about a year ago. She quit because they built a new house and she didn't want to smoke it up so she would go outside to smoke and she said it was too cold in the winter. But she likes the smell of smoke, too.

193 posted on 01/28/2005 10:16:17 PM PST by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
they've all been wrong on second hand smoke.

I think they know that. I think it has been a case of scratching each others backs. Heres my take on the whole business. It has to do with the massive amount of money in cancer research and law suits. Lots of people are getting rich and they don't want to give up those fat payoffs. They created a great big mass of antismoking extremists to push their agenda so they aren't going to admit they have been lying. The antismoking activists aren't going to give it up either. They've gotten their way too long.

194 posted on 01/28/2005 10:24:16 PM PST by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Johnny Carson regretted that he ever smoked.

Lots of nonsmokers get COPD, too. That only smoking causes COPD is another myth. Lots of things cause COPD.

195 posted on 01/28/2005 10:28:43 PM PST by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
My one grandmother smoked three packs of unfiltered Camels for years and lived to be 86 years old. Died of old age.

And I bet the Dr. who treated her claimed cigarettes were the cause of death.

196 posted on 01/28/2005 10:39:27 PM PST by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
it took something like 800 sodas per day for 20 years to get cancer

I drank 800 sodas a day from 1980 to 1999, then quit and beat the odds.

197 posted on 01/28/2005 10:47:32 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BriarBey
You people crack me up...you'll make that comment but I'd lay bets you'll sit and smell your own farts and think nothing of it!!

ROTFLMAO!!!!!! I understand farts have methane gas in them, too. Very hazardous to the health. LOL

198 posted on 01/28/2005 10:50:12 PM PST by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Mears; TexasCowboy; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Madame Dufarge; Gabz; MeeknMing; steve50; ...
I'm astonished that someone would send a Freepmail like that.

Hey there. Just signed on and having my first cup of coffee. I also checked my FReep mail and sure enough, he wrote me back.

He is putting the blame mostly on ME and how he HATES the way I am. He has a hard on for me, and it's not one of the good kind either.

He believes that I am not proving anything, (guess he doesn't want to take time to read the links I provide, or else he must think that "I" wrote them myself. heh!)

Just got to consider the source, I guess. But this person really really hates me.

Pity.


199 posted on 01/29/2005 5:48:47 AM PST by SheLion (God bless our military members and keep them safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
And I bet the Dr. who treated her claimed cigarettes were the cause of death.

No no. Not back then. She was never sick, and died peacefully in her sleep in her own bed. Smoking was never mentioned in the year that she died.

200 posted on 01/29/2005 5:50:12 AM PST by SheLion (God bless our military members and keep them safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson