Skip to comments."Nuclear Warfare is the Solution for Destroying America"
Posted on 01/28/2005 9:27:46 AM PST by robowombat
From a Muslim Web site: A photocopy of the article published on a site that is identified with Bin Laden's organization. http://www.idf.il/newsite/images/0119-2p2.gif
"Nuclear Warfare is the Solution for Destroying America"
In the name of Allah the most merciful. Thus, you are not mistaken in reading this text. This is the only way to kill the greatest possible number of Americans. The Americans have never experienced a threat like this one. During World War II, America used this [nuclear] weapon twice in three days following the successful Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Today, the United States uses the most powerful and advanced weapons of destruction against the peaceful citizens of Iraq and Afghanistan, and it proudly supports the war that Russia is waging against Chechnya, not out of affection for Russia, but rather from its hatred of Moslems.
America has bombed Iraq with weaponry that will pollute the soil and underground water with radiation for thousands of years. It also enhances its bombs with depleted uranium to cause even greater harm to the people and the environment. This, so that no one should think that after they leave the island of [the Prophet] Mohammed [the Arabian Peninsula], which they have transformed into a restricted area, just to return to the same place [because of the pollution perpetrated by them]. It seems, in fact, that the wild beasts in the White House have forgotten or have tried to forget one very important thing, which is, in all pride - the Al-Qaeda organization. This organization, which strikes fear in the hearts of the infidel West, turns youth into people who have nothing in this world but their devotion to Allah and to His Prophet Mohammed, and who are the tormentors of the sons of whores [i.e. - the West], and who are shining examples of estrangement from the sins of this world ... and of selling their souls to Allah.... Therefore, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. Even though the Americans have bombs possessing enormous power, Al-Qaeda is even more powerful than they, and it has in its possession bombs which are called "dirty bombs", and bombs with deadly viruses, which will spread fatal diseases throughout American cities....
The coming days will prove that Kaedat el-Jihad [the Al-Qaeda organization] is capable of turning America into a sea of deadly radiation, and this will prove to the world that the end is at hand.... Yes, we will destroy America and its allies, because they have used their power for evil against the weak.
And now, the end approaches at the hand of the enlightened [Islamic] youth astride their horses [fighting the war against the infidels]; they will dismount either as victors or vanquished [i.e. - fall in holy war for Allah].
Author: Abu Shihab El-Kandahari
26 December 2002
I hope that he doesn't have too much of an attachment to Mecca.
Sounds like some retard from San Francisco...
(*)Not to including titty bars, drug addiction and mass quantities of alcohol.
And this, "the sons of whores [i.e. - the West]". Wouldn't that describe Ishmael's mother, whose sons are the Arabs?
"The coming days will prove that Kaedat el-Jihad [the Al-Qaeda organization] is capable of turning America into a sea of deadly radiation...."
"26 December 2002"
Sorry, Mr. Al-Rabid-Frothing-At-The-Mouth-ul, but the only "dirty bombs" that have been exploding in this country in the last two years have been the occasional hippie-infested ANSWER and MoveOn rallies.
So the US has bombed Iraq with radioactive weaponry eh? So.....um, then um......oh dear. This is just pathetic. I wasn't aware the US would send troops into fields of battle where there was radioactive fallout.....this is almost as bad as the Giant Fallujan spiders.
Hagar was a concubine of Abram and bore Ishmael because Sara (Abram's wife) sent her into Abram in order to 'fulfill the promise of The Lord unto them'.
Back in the late 60s I worked with a Christian Arab, PhD physicist, native of Nazareth, with whom I could discuss Mideast problems (up to a point). Once I said "aren't you all related anyway?" He answered "yeah - - they call us sons of the slave!"
LOL! What a twisted f*ck this guy is...
Most believe, including the Arabs that we are doing all that we can to contain Iraq when on a grand scale of things all we are doing is toying with them.
If Bush ordered it we could annihilate that countries very existence along with Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Libya etc
Imagine if we fielded a force of 250,000 to 500,000 men, we pressed the attack with 6,000 Abrams tanks (we have close to 9,000 in inventory) and we hit them with 50% of the airpower we have.
Shock and Awe would quickly turn into Sh!t and Spew.
We are just toying with them, they exist simply because we have not yet decided to kill them, if we did there is nothing anyone could do to stop us.
If any Arab were to use any nuclear device of any type on our soil our retaliation should be so swift, so violent and brutal that the world holds its collective breath and Arabs everywhere in the world no matter how radical they may be realize the depth of the mistake they have made and the fact that we will hunt them do and kill every last one of them.
If Allah's sons who are pigs and donkeys should ever ignite a nuclear bomb in an American city we would be justified in turning the entire Middle East into a parking lot.The states that fund and instigate terror such as Syria,Saudi Arabia and Iran would have to be turned into glass to satisfy my need for vengeance.
They think for some reason that we don't have a bead on them, when we do.
It's quite clear that Islamist/Wahabbi extremists are supported and financed by Syria, Saudi, Pakistan, Iran, and a couple others.
I have no doubt that "a message" has been delivered to the leaders of these countries.
Yeah, we dropped nukes on Japan to make a point. And we'll do it again if necessary.
Actually, to physically destroy america from without, nuclear is about the only way.
As I fly over cities, I am amazed at just how many buildings make up the US. The amount of developed real estate is staggering. As I fly over Minneapolis for example, I imagine an area of eight city blocks on fire and, from 10,000 feet, it is just a tiny little dot on a huge developed landscape. Trying to destroy this country with conventional weapons would be akin to trying to kill an elephant by sticking it with a pin once a week. It MIGHT be mildly annoyed.
That said, it would still take a lot of nukes and, after the first one, the rest would need to be carried by missles because there is no way they would make it over the border, mainly because all the muslims in this country would be dead or in "internment camps."
"...it would still take a lot of nukes and, after the first one, the rest would need to be carried by missles because there is no way they would make it over the border, mainly because all the muslims in this country would be dead or in "internment camps."
I wish I could be as certain as you are that the US would even have the will to retaliate for such a strike. I don't. In this last election New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C. all went for the Democrat ass. And these were places that actually experienced many deaths at the hands of the mad Moslem murderers among us.
I will send fire on Magog and on those who live in safety in the coastlands, and they will know that I am the LORD .
spot on => given the mentally of the skedaddle crowd we have now making noise, it's doubtful that we'll have the will to use nukes. Heck, before Pearl Harbor attack, the majority of Americans were quite opposed to getting involved in Europe's mess. That attituded changed quite rapidly after December 7. Unfortunately, we didn't see the same move to "get the job done" after 9/11. Since then, and inreasingly so of late, we've had to endure lengthy tomes on "how US is cause of problem" and how we need to "listen to what the freedom fighters are really saying."
Unless there is one helluva silent majority in the land, I say NYC or Washington DC have 3 years to go, and I'm leaning toward DC being the next target of choice by the pious terrorists. My gut says they'll want to send message that even w/ Bush, we're not safe => help to maximize terror, even if they only get off a dirty bomb.
Tough times made more troubling by Kennedy and his ilk than Osama and Zarqawi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.