Skip to comments.
"Nuclear Warfare is the Solution for Destroying America"
JRN ^
| 26 December 2002
| Abu Shihab El-Kandahari
Posted on 01/28/2005 9:27:46 AM PST by robowombat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: robowombat
"Nuclear Warfare is the Solution for Destroying America"
If it is the ideal weapon for destroying America, it surely must be equally the perfect weapon for eradicating islam, the cancer of humanity.
Today, the United States uses the most powerful and advanced weapons of destruction against the peaceful citizens of Iraq and Afghanistan
If the writer believes this, he is the world's dumbest terrorist and will wet himself when he actually witneses the use of the "most powerful and advanced weapons", that America has held back in a show of almost inhuman restraint.
This sad sad person doesn't even begin to have a clue. I hope that I am still alive when it happens.
(Oh yes, I am as certain as a human being can be that it's a matter of "when" not a matter of "if".
Even if the time is chosen by the murdering, primitive ignorant animals-on-two-legs. The when will leave any survivors forever cursing their prophet (sbuh) and his imaginary "angel". (sbuht), and if they insist on continuing to venerate a meteorite (or the site where it used to be) the total eradication is certain.
21
posted on
01/28/2005 10:56:17 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
To: robowombat
22
posted on
01/28/2005 11:01:31 AM PST
by
granite
To: rdcorso
The states that fund and instigate terror such as Syria,Saudi Arabia and Iran would have to be turned into glass to satisfy my need for vengeance.You are the paragon of restraint, proportionality and mercy compared to my vision.
For starters, I would level every muslim capital. That should take one to 8 nukes each. Then I would move on to the other 90% of the destruction that would begin to satisfy me.
Patience is a good thing.
There is always a limit to patience. Your mileage may vary...
23
posted on
01/28/2005 11:02:17 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
To: granite
I guess because our buddies the Saudis had been squeezing the US ever since Khobar Towers and even harder after 9-11 to remove our military forces from th Kingdom. That done the difficulty of enforcing the blocadefrom the Gulf States along with most of them not being willing to have us come visit for a long while would effectively sink the embargo resolutions regime within a year or two. Saddam would emerge as the de facto victor over the US while we were proclaiming a 'Global War on terrorism'. That would tell Arabs and beyond the Arab world Muslims in general that the US could indeed be beaten if you were just determined enough and held out long enough. Not a good message to have sent. And also there was a lot of question as to how long the House of Saud could keep power. In the event of another Khomeini like event having Iraq pacified and pro-American with probably bigger oil reserves than the Sacred Sand Pile seemed an attractive option.
To: Blood of Tyrants
The jihad vermin apparently doesn't realize that their jihadistans could be "gone in 60 seconds". Thermonuclear trups nuclear.
To: Dallas59
"What is best in life?" To crush the jihadists, to drive their collaborators before you, and to hear the lamentations of their media! Allahu fubar!
To: robowombat
One DB in America should be justification for the end of Mecca, two - the price of Medina.
27
posted on
01/28/2005 11:28:28 AM PST
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
28
posted on
01/28/2005 11:34:43 AM PST
by
SJackson
( Bush is as free as a bird, He is only accountable to history and God, Ra'anan Gissin)
To: bowzer313
A nuke in the center of NYC would set us back about 20 years economically. As long as we leave our borders open, we are at risk.
Of course, a nuke in NYC would get rid of a lot of leftists, on the upside.
29
posted on
01/28/2005 11:46:45 AM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: robowombat
they will dismount either as victors or vanquished [i.e. - fall in holy war for Allah]. Well, since their lucky strike on 9/11, there's been a whole lot of # 2 for them. Let's keep the flith in # 2 where it belongs.
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Exactly. But it still astonishes me as to extent of the lies that are told.
To: robowombat
and it proudly supports the war that Russia is waging against Chechnya, not out of affection for Russia, but rather from its hatred of Moslems.Hey, whaddya know.
Even a blind pig can find an acorn every now and again.
32
posted on
01/28/2005 11:57:33 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Running around in a circle waving my arms and screaming like a little girl)
To: robowombat; SJackson
Memo from Virginia to Abu Shihab El-Kandahari:
33
posted on
01/28/2005 11:58:02 AM PST
by
Convert from ECUSA
(tired of all the shucking and jiving)
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
If any Arab were to use any nuclear device of any type on our soil our retaliation should be so swift, so violent and brutal that the world holds its collective breath and Arabs everywhere in the world no matter how radical they may be realize the depth of the mistake they have made and the fact that we will hunt them do and kill every last one of themLets get pre-emptive.
34
posted on
01/28/2005 11:58:28 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Running around in a circle waving my arms and screaming like a little girl)
To: Dallas59
35
posted on
01/28/2005 12:03:55 PM PST
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: B-Chan
Great picture! I hope it happens one day!
36
posted on
01/28/2005 12:34:40 PM PST
by
Bombardier
(Jihad, Nazism....Umma, Deutsches Reich.....no diff.)
To: Salem; IAF ThunderPilot; anotherview; American in Israel
Religion of 'peace' alert - and a reminder of what our enemies want to do to us - ping!
37
posted on
01/28/2005 12:38:21 PM PST
by
Convert from ECUSA
(tired of all the shucking and jiving)
To: Lazamataz
I agree. The blood of those who will die is on the hands of those who refuse to act now when the threat is perfectly clear.
38
posted on
01/28/2005 12:42:30 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(How do you say Berkeley California in Aramaic?)
To: West Coast Conservative
39
posted on
01/28/2005 12:45:04 PM PST
by
Convert from ECUSA
(tired of all the shucking and jiving)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Or Medina, Cairo, Damascus, Beirut, Aleppo, Manama, Safat, Riyadh, Jiddah, Dhahran, Al Khobar .......
A few thousand deliverable warheads allows one to take care of business with plenty left over for other "contingencies".
40
posted on
01/28/2005 12:47:19 PM PST
by
katana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson