Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Seek Cuts in Medicaid, Benefits
Ass Press via Yahoo!News ^ | January 21, 2005 | ALAN FRAM

Posted on 01/21/2005 6:20:43 PM PST by Kaslin

WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) is readying a new budget that would carve savings from Medicaid and other benefit programs, congressional aides and lobbyists say, but it is unclear if he will be able to push the plan through the Republican-run Congress.

White House officials are not saying what Bush's $2.5 trillion 2006 budget will propose saving from such programs, which comprise the biggest and fastest growing part.

But lobbyists and lawmakers' aides, speaking on condition of anonymity, say he will focus on Medicaid, the health-care program for low-income and disabled people. Medicaid costs are split between Washington and the states.

Many expect him to propose giving states more flexibility in using the $180 billion in federal Medicaid funds each year, but to limit the program's growth on a per-patient basis — in effect forcing the states to find ways to save money.

Bush may also propose trimming doctors' reimbursements or weeding fraud from Medicare, the health insurance system for the elderly and disabled, the aides and lobbyists said.

He may seek savings from agriculture and other benefit programs as well in the spending blueprint he will send to Capitol Hill on Feb. 7.

There has not been a serious effort to pluck savings from such programs — called entitlements because the benefits go automatically to anyone who qualifies — since 1997.

After two straight record federal deficits that peaked at $412 billion last year, many Republicans are eager to constrain government spending by curbing the growth of benefits. By law such programs, which consume nearly two-thirds of the budget, grow to keep pace with inflation and ever-larger numbers of recipients.

Conservatives — including the chairmen of the House and Senate budget committees, Rep. Jim Nussle (news, bio, voting record), R-Iowa, and Sen. Judd Gregg (news, bio, voting record), R-N.H. — may want to go even further than whatever savings Bush proposes. Many of them consider Bush's goal of halving the budget deficit by 2009 too timid, and see the coming retirement of the 76 million baby boomers as threatening to snowball federal spending.

"There's this demographic tidal wave coming at us," Gregg said in a recent interview. "We've got to adjust our retirement structure to maintain a strong program for retirees" while making sure younger people won't "be taxed to the point where their lifestyle is significantly reduced."

Other Republicans, recalling past Democratic attacks when such programs were targeted, are wary. Veteran Rep. Christopher Shays (news, bio, voting record), R-Conn., said many lawmakers would support such cuts if they would balance the budget in the short term but would be unwilling to "take a big hit" for incremental deficit reduction.

By proposing an overhaul this year of Social Security (news - web sites), the biggest benefit program at more than $500 billion annually, Bush has asked GOP lawmakers to risk angering senior citizens worried about the retirement and pension program.

Simultaneously pursuing savings from other programs would only increase many legislators' heartburn.

They would face the wrath of doctors — major GOP contributors — should Bush propose limiting the Medicare payments physicians receive. Governors of both parties are already trying to head off any effort to trim Medicaid, while farmers, veterans and other groups would be sure to combat any efforts to curtail their benefits.

"It's obviously going to be a very difficult lift," Nussle said recently.

"Everyone has a program, everyone has a constituency, everyone has a point where they lose their courage to reform a government that is too big," he said. "Republicans need to wake up. You can't have tax cuts without spending restraint and get to a balanced budget."

Among the fastest growing benefits is Medicare, which increased by an estimated 8.1 percent last year and is projected to pass $320 billion this year. Bush is considered unlikely to seek major savings from a program to which he and lawmakers added expensive prescription drug benefits less than two years ago.

According to Congressional Budget Office (news - web sites) estimates last fall, Medicaid spending grew by 9.4 percent while Social Security costs expanded by 4.5 percent.

The budget office projected last September that this year's deficit will hit $348 billion, and stay in the $300 billion range through 2010. The office plans to release its newest estimates on Tuesday.

In 1997 President Clinton (news - web sites) and the GOP-run Congress enacted a compromise aimed at balancing the budget in five years. Most of the $130 billion in five-year savings came from reducing health providers' Medicare reimbursements.

That deal capped two years of battling in which Democrats criticized then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., for proposing Medicare savings. Republicans suffered losses at the polls due to that clash, and Gingrich said in an interview this week that for Bush to prevail this time, he will have to persuade voters to support his proposed savings.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: bush43; medicaid; medicare; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Not that it isn't a good idea but a lot of this looks like pure speculation to me by the liberal media
1 posted on 01/21/2005 6:20:44 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
About damn time.

But I'll believe it when I see it.

2 posted on 01/21/2005 6:24:31 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hopefully this will extend to the other elements of socialized medicine.
New Yorks child and family health plus(I think that is the official name of the program)has just about bankrupted the upstate counties.
The law of unintended consequences always happens as some employees and employers reportedly discontinued insurance to go on the program.
3 posted on 01/21/2005 6:26:00 PM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlr
When I hear some old geezer talking about how her free health care from NY allows her to travel, take yoga, and enjoy life, I want to scream.

Living in rent controlled apartments all their lives, enjoying the good life at the expense of others.

4 posted on 01/21/2005 6:29:32 PM PST by OldFriend (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I may be wrong but from personal observation Medicaid is one of the most abused and wasteful gimme programs that the gov has ever come up with.


5 posted on 01/21/2005 6:31:34 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Man: Here's one-

Cart-master: Ninepence.

Old Man: (feebly) I'm not dead!

Cart-master: (suprised) What?

Man: Nothing! Here's your ninepence....

Old Man: I'm not dead!

Cart-master: 'Ere! 'E says 'e's not dead!

Man: Yes he is.

Old Man: I'm not!

Cart-master: 'E isn't?

Man: Well... he will be soon-- he's very ill...

Old Man: I'm getting better!

Man: No you're not, you'll be stone dead in a

moment.

6 posted on 01/21/2005 6:35:03 PM PST by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Frankly I don't get it. We just signed on to a program that will cost trillions (the medication addition to Medicare), and now we're supposed to be worried about rising costs?

Whew!


7 posted on 01/21/2005 6:37:31 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Fear mongering. They want people in wheelchairs picketing the WH. I'm sure ABC is readying a MEMO as we speak.


8 posted on 01/21/2005 6:46:13 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I'll bet Bush doesn't even think about cutting "Emergency Medicaid". This is the medicaid for illegal immigrants. I would like to see the total of American medicaid and the total of emergency medicaid. Bush will cut Americans but he won't cut illegals. Mexicans come across the border for emergency medicaid daily.


9 posted on 01/21/2005 6:51:36 PM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I think President Bush is going to accomplish a great deal in his second term, and I hope that this is one area that he can make progress in.

(Now if they would discuss rescinding the drug "benefit" ... ;-)

10 posted on 01/21/2005 7:02:46 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Many expect him to propose giving states more flexibility in using the $180 billion in federal Medicaid funds each year, but to limit the program's growth on a per-patient basis"
11 posted on 01/21/2005 7:04:27 PM PST by cookcounty (-It's THE WHITE HOUSE, not THE WAFFLE HOUSE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
"Many expect him to propose giving states more flexibility in using the $180 billion in federal Medicaid funds each year, but to limit the program's growth on a per-patient basis"

"limits on growth" = "cuts?"
Any anti-Bush bias here?

12 posted on 01/21/2005 7:06:20 PM PST by cookcounty (-It's THE WHITE HOUSE, not THE WAFFLE HOUSE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

You are absolutely correct.
Medicaid is the biggest waste of money and needs to be cut.

Cut out the prescription drug coverage of medicare, cut out paying for stomach stapling with medicare and medicaid.


13 posted on 01/21/2005 7:10:39 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Bush to Seek Cuts in Medicaid, Benefits"

Before, or after he starves the children?

14 posted on 01/21/2005 7:12:59 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texastoo

Exactly!!! Thank you for pointing out the obvious. They are the reason for this increase in healthcare spending.
Get rid of the illegals they are the drain on all of our resources including our money!!, than get rid of medicaid!


15 posted on 01/21/2005 7:15:03 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Personally, I would ELIMINATE all of these programs, including social security, and shut down all entitlement programs, shut down 90% of the Federal Government. HUD? OSHA? DOE? HHS? FAA? ... The list goes on. Worthless bureacratic crap employing illiterate cretins that can maybe figure out their way to the rest rooms, providing that there a training manual produced in Pueblo, Colorado.


16 posted on 01/21/2005 7:19:35 PM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texastoo

Whether they're illegal Mexicans or government citizens, they're still on the public teat. As long as he puts the knife to the program, that's all that matters to me, whether those affected are "Mexcuns" or "Amercuns."


17 posted on 01/21/2005 7:24:02 PM PST by Clemenza (Europhiles and Monarchists should be purged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ass Press: Very descriptive


18 posted on 01/21/2005 7:56:07 PM PST by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But lobbyists and lawmakers' aides, speaking on condition of anonymity, say he will focus on Medicaid...

Anonymous sources again.

This is AP/Hillary BS. They're setting up a no-win situation for the Republicans and Medicaid.

They can't let it continue to grow and they can't cut the rate of growth.

19 posted on 01/21/2005 8:31:14 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist

You would not believe what goes on in senior medicine. There is lots of expensive surgery on people in their 80's. Now we even get a free health club membership through Medicare. Currently I know of an 84 year old woman who has been in the hospital for three weeks getting therapy to strengthen her muscles. Nuts! A Medicare patient is a doctor's meal ticket.


20 posted on 01/21/2005 8:37:41 PM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson