Skip to comments.
Proposed Bill in Virginia will make you a criminal if you fail to report a miscarriage.
Virginia State Legislature ^
| 1/7/04
| James Cosgrove
Posted on 01/07/2005 5:06:58 PM PST by SilentServiceCPO
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1. That § 32.1-264 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:... When a fetal death occurs without medical attendance, it shall be the woman's responsibility to report the death to the law-enforcement agency in the jurisdiction of which the delivery occurs within 12 hours after the delivery. A violation of this section shall be punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor.
(Excerpt) Read more at leg1.state.va.us ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; government; govwatch; libertarians; miscarriage; policestate; privacy; toomanylaws; vageneralassembly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: mrsmith
A. A fetal death report for each fetal death which occurs in this Commonwealth shall be filed, on a form furnished by the State Registrar, with the registrar of the district in which the delivery occurred or the abortion was performed within three days after such delivery or abortion and shall be registered with such registrar if it has been completed and filed in accordance with this section; provided that:Seems pretty clear to me.
21
posted on
01/07/2005 5:58:15 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: SilentServiceCPO
Missed period?
Die, commrade.
Welcome to the PrisonPlanet.com
22
posted on
01/07/2005 5:58:30 PM PST
by
lodwick
To: SilentServiceCPO
Amend this:
This is the current law in Virginia and it only concerns live births and abortions, not miscarriages. To this: This is the current law in Virginia and it only concerns deliveries and abortions, not miscarriages.
23
posted on
01/07/2005 6:08:58 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: mrsmith
§ 32.1-249. Definitions:... 2. "Fetal death" means death prior to the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of human conception, regardless of the duration of pregnancy; death is indicated by the fact that after such expulsion or extraction the fetus does not breathe or show any other evidence of life such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles. I understand your point, and anyone with common sense would say that criminal penalties shouldn't apply, but the legal definition of "Fetal Death" in VA specifically states that duration of pregnancy is irrelevant. Link is here: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+32.1-249
To: KoRn
"The 20-week cutoff is based on the Board of Health's definition of fetal death, as opposed to miscarriage, Byron said. Twenty weeks is also after the cutoff for abortions. " But I'm familiar with some RNs so if one says 17 weeks, then it's 17 weeks!
BTW: congratulations and keep up the good work! The world needs all the Virginians it can get.
25
posted on
01/07/2005 6:12:14 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: SilentServiceCPO
This is horrid and I swear to God, I better not hear from one whack job about how abortion makes this okay.
26
posted on
01/07/2005 6:12:45 PM PST
by
ShadowDancer
(Those who restrain desire, do so because theirs is weak enough to be restrained.)
To: bitt
"talk to any woman who is a mother and you'll find that at least 50% seem to have miscarried at least once... "I'm one of them. This sounds like a bad bill. It won't stop mothers from sticking live babies in the garbage to die, which is murder and obviously illegal. It'll make the lives of law abiding young women, heart broken aftr losing a shild, that much more miserable.
27
posted on
01/07/2005 6:13:00 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: rmmcdaniell
Its nonsense like this coming from pro-lifers that will allow the abortionists to paint pro-lifers even more as extremistsDamned right.
28
posted on
01/07/2005 6:14:03 PM PST
by
ShadowDancer
(Those who restrain desire, do so because theirs is weak enough to be restrained.)
To: SilentServiceCPO
It has been estimated that more than half of all fertilized eggs end up in miscarriage. A lot of eggs naturally just don't implant (yes, even without BC) and the woman never notices.
29
posted on
01/07/2005 6:15:26 PM PST
by
Nataku X
(There are no converts in Islam... only hostages.)
To: mrsmith
Thanks! By the way, the wife tells me that's the way they do at her hospital. It could be a county/city rule, who knows. I DO KNOW she has been wrong before hehe....don't tell her I said that though.
30
posted on
01/07/2005 6:18:26 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: cake_crumb
Correcton: "It'll make the lives of law abiding young women, heart broken
aftr after losing a
shild child, that much more miserable."
Caffeination is our friend....and I hate using this desk, it's dark over here and the keyboard is different.
31
posted on
01/07/2005 6:19:42 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: jwalsh07
I am aware of the current law, what this thread is about is a proposed
ammendment to the law the
provides for criminal penalties for a woman who suffers an
unattended fetal death (miscarriage falls into this category regardless of the intentions of the good Delegate) and fails to report this to the police within twelve hours of the event.
Read the link above if you doubt this. And also, in VA, "fetal death", as defined by law, is independant of the gestational age of the baby. So, I will not be writing a letter of apology to Cosgrove or anyone else. I actually expect my representatives to not make such glaring errors (of course, assuming that it is not his intention to place grieving mothers in jail for failing to call the cops within 12 hours)
To: KoRn
To: SilentServiceCPO
That certainly sounds like Cosgrove has made an error in terminology.
34
posted on
01/07/2005 6:25:50 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: SilentServiceCPO
Thanks! We are having a boy!!!!! This was the final try....after 3 girls AAHHHHRRRRGGG!!!!!!
35
posted on
01/07/2005 6:26:09 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: afnamvet
Dang, I was certain it was the umpteenth degree.
36
posted on
01/07/2005 6:27:13 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
To: KoRn
LOL, My Dad wanted a girl so bad. He gave up after four boys though:-)
To: SilentServiceCPO
I think this is a no brainer. What woman (in her right mind) doesn't talk to her dr. at miscarraige? They have to examine you to see if everything went ok. If not they have to do a dnc and most of the time after the 9th week they have to do a dnc anyway. Secondly, you don't wait till 3 months anymore to see a dr., you can get a sonogram immediately and start blood testing, fetal monitoring etc as early as 6 weeks or sooner. I think this might have something to do with the abortion pill and the women's deaths it is causing. It's not really and invasion of privacy if the dr. reports it and this way they can collect some stats on RU-289 or whatever the number is.
38
posted on
01/07/2005 6:31:31 PM PST
by
RecallMoran
(The left would RATHER lie)
To: KoRn
Congratulations! I had 2 girls and then a boy, Boys are so much easier which makes it nice since he is the last one and she/both of you will be tired!
On this issue, don't most women go to their DR. after a miscarriage and surely he fills out paperwork needed for state records such as these? Why do the police have to be involved?
39
posted on
01/07/2005 6:38:00 PM PST
by
Ellesu
To: mrsmith
I certainly hope so. I love living in Chesapeake in part because of the political atmosphere, not in spite of it. His office has reportedly said that the intention of this amendment is to prevent the abandonment of babies after birth. However, Virginia already has a "Safe Haven" law and plenty of Child Endangerment laws on the books. Also, this law would only apply to baby (fetus, to some) born dead, so abandonment is not an issue at that point. I sincerely hope that this is just a case of legislative incompetence and not a serious attempt to invade the privacy of Virginians by criminalizing what is already a traumatic experience for the families involved.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson