Posted on 12/11/2004 7:53:21 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
Recount by the numbers Here are some interesting numbers to mull over:
Counties reported: 10, representing ~4% of the statewide vote Rossi's lead over Gregoire in the counties that have reported: +683, or a margin of +0.6686% Net new two-party votes since the machine recount: +57, an increase of 0.06%
In the remaining 29 counties, Gregoire led the machine recount by 640 votes, or a margin of 0.0242%.
In order for Gregoire to win (or tie), she would need to increase that lead of 640 votes to 683 votes, a 6.7% increase. Simply put, either she has to get the same 0.0242% margin on a 6.7% larger pool of votes than there were in the machine recount, or she needs to get a 6.7% larger margin on the same number of ballots. To grow the unrecounted pool by 6.7% requires another 178,000 ballots. That's a little optimistic, even for Paul Berendt, who thinks there are 15,000 valid ballots in the REJECT pile. The reporting counties only grew their pool of two-party ballots by 0.06%, which would translate into 1,475 such ballots from the remaining counties. The machine recount produced 2,300 new ballots in those counties, so you never know. In any event. It's still a small enough increase that she would still need to increase her margin by essentially the same 6.7% to 0.0258%.
Here's where we do some of the math that will only produce horselaughs from those who try to make statistical arguments without using any actual numbers or formulas.
Gregoire's lead in the 29 remaining counties in the first count was 0.0163%. If you look at her leads in the two counts: (0.0163%, 0.0242%) you can calculate sample mean, standard error and a t-statistic of 1.41. This tells us that there is slightly less than a 20% chance for the next count to give Gregoire a lead of 0.0258% or greater. i.e, based on the information we have available today, we can be 80% confident that Rossi will win the 3rd recount.
Of course, this number will be revised (and can change significantly) as new information becomes available. A Supreme Court order to change the way that the recount is conducted could change this number by quite a lot. In the meantime, if you are a Democrat who is contemplating a job in the Gregoire administration, but you have another job offer that you have to decide on by today, you might not want to forfeit a 100% sure thing for a 20% long shot.
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at December 09, 2004 09:54 PM
Alessandro
A couple hundred extra ballots tossed in or found in bathrooms or locked cabinets, in major counties will throw these numbers to the wind.
Manual recount results are not final or official until certified by the counties. The results posted on this site are unofficial as some counties have not presented results to the county canvassing board for final certification. The Secretary of State is projecting that all counties will have certified results by December 23, 2004. After all counties have certified results, the Secretary of State will file an amended abstract of the manual recount returns that will be the final count of the Governors race. |
MANUAL RECOUNT RESULTS BY COUNTY | Machine Recount Results by County |
NOTE: Gain/Loss results are only available for counties with 100% of precincts reporting.
GOVERNOR | |||||||||
County | Christine Gregoire(D) | Dino Rossi(R) | Ruth Bennett(L) | ||||||
Manual Recount | Machine Recount | Gain/Loss | Manual Recount | Machine Recount | Gain/Loss | Manual Recount | Machine Recount | Gain/Loss | |
Adams | 1,529 | 1,529 | 0 | 3,481 | 3,486 | -5 | 81 | 81 | 0 |
Asotin | 0 | 3,525 | N/A | 0 | 4,904 | N/A | 0 | 193 | N/A |
Benton | 0 | 19,831 | N/A | 0 | 44,890 | N/A | 0 | 1,118 | N/A |
Chelan | 0 | 10,077 | N/A | 0 | 18,437 | N/A | 0 | 523 | N/A |
Clallam | 16,230 | 16,226 | +4 | 18,836 | 18,832 | +4 | 920 | 919 | +1 |
Clark | 0 | 72,800 | N/A | 0 | 85,894 | N/A | 0 | 4,123 | N/A |
Columbia | 671 | 671 | 0 | 1,371 | 1,370 | +1 | 37 | 37 | 0 |
Cowlitz | 0 | 20,207 | N/A | 0 | 20,047 | N/A | 0 | 1,093 | N/A |
Douglas | 0 | 4,359 | N/A | 0 | 8,666 | N/A | 0 | 219 | N/A |
Ferry | 1,278 | 1,278 | 0 | 1,900 | 1,900 | 0 | 118 | 118 | 0 |
Franklin | 0 | 4,967 | N/A | 0 | 10,619 | N/A | 0 | 227 | N/A |
Garfield | 428 | 428 | 0 | 840 | 840 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 0 |
Grant | 0 | 7,826 | N/A | 0 | 17,429 | N/A | 0 | 535 | N/A |
Grays Harbor | 13,729 | 13,719 | +10 | 13,457 | 13,449 | +8 | 575 | 575 | 0 |
Island | 0 | 16,888 | N/A | 0 | 19,997 | N/A | 0 | 814 | N/A |
Jefferson | 10,650 | 10,642 | +8 | 7,295 | 7,289 | +6 | 466 | 466 | 0 |
King | 0 | 505,836 | N/A | 0 | 351,127 | N/A | 0 | 18,936 | N/A |
Kitsap | 56,236 | 56,164 | +72 | 57,775 | 57,693 | +82 | 3,097 | 3,090 | +7 |
Kittitas | 0 | 6,125 | N/A | 0 | 9,567 | N/A | 0 | 277 | N/A |
Klickitat | 0 | 3,919 | N/A | 0 | 4,767 | N/A | 0 | 265 | N/A |
Lewis | 10,247 | 10,245 | +2 | 20,851 | 20,842 | +9 | 757 | 756 | +1 |
Lincoln | 1,850 | 1,850 | 0 | 3,686 | 3,686 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
Mason | 11,797 | 11,788 | +9 | 12,519 | 12,507 | +12 | 680 | 682 | -2 |
Okanogan | 0 | 6,101 | N/A | 0 | 9,450 | N/A | 0 | 465 | N/A |
Pacific | 5,210 | 5,210 | 0 | 4,730 | 4,730 | 0 | 296 | 295 | +1 |
Pend Oreille | 2,567 | 2,567 | 0 | 3,368 | 3,366 | +2 | 179 | 179 | 0 |
Pierce | 0 | 145,199 | N/A | 0 | 157,704 | N/A | 0 | 7,241 | N/A |
San Juan | 0 | 5,872 | N/A | 0 | 3,660 | N/A | 0 | 321 | N/A |
Skagit | 0 | 23,266 | N/A | 0 | 27,224 | N/A | 0 | 1,267 | N/A |
Skamania | 2,233 | 2,232 | +1 | 2,525 | 2,522 | +3 | 178 | 178 | 0 |
Snohomish | 0 | 139,070 | N/A | 0 | 145,553 | N/A | 0 | 6,852 | N/A |
Spokane | 0 | 90,573 | N/A | 0 | 105,569 | N/A | 0 | 3,878 | N/A |
Stevens | 6,992 | 6,992 | 0 | 12,295 | 12,293 | +2 | 566 | 566 | 0 |
Thurston | 0 | 58,955 | N/A | 0 | 49,413 | N/A | 0 | 2,574 | N/A |
Wahkiakum | 993 | 993 | 0 | 1,099 | 1,100 | -1 | 61 | 61 | 0 |
Walla Walla | 8,008 | 8,006 | +2 | 14,290 | 14,277 | +13 | 378 | 381 | -3 |
Whatcom | 0 | 44,056 | N/A | 0 | 41,978 | N/A | 0 | 2,177 | N/A |
Whitman | 0 | 7,715 | N/A | 0 | 9,363 | N/A | 0 | 457 | N/A |
Yakima | 0 | 24,735 | N/A | 0 | 46,044 | N/A | 0 | 1,351 | N/A |
Totals | 150,648 (44.3761%)
|
1,372,442 (48.8702%)
|
+108 | 180,318 (53.1159%)
|
1,372,484 (48.8717%)
|
+136 | 8,514 (2.5080%)
|
63,415 (2.2581%)
|
+5 |
Results last updated on: 12/10/2004 4:26:00 PM
The only way rats can win major elections these days is by CHEATING....VOTER FRAUD!!!
Isn't there a law that states, "vote recounting will continue until a minimum one vote margin exists in favor of the Democrat candidate. At that time all recountiung is ordered to stop"?
King County will NOT be NORMAL.....they'll do everything they can to find the right number of votes to win there....EVERYTHING. It's where most of the commies in Washington, the State, live.
I hope not. Anyway, if we are up about 500 votes before King results, we should win.
No doubt King County will not report until last, so they know how many votes they have to find.
What happened in Kitsap County with the manual recount?
They just set the precendent for hundreds of new "votes", for King County to emulate.
Kitsap 56,236 56,164 +72 57,775 57,693 +82 3,097 3,090 +7
It does make you wonder what happened with the machine counting that they would pick up so many more than other counties did. But the increase was still on par one with the other, just like all the other counties that have been counted. So we can assume that King County will be the same.
If there is a big jump in votes for Gregoire, more than 42 increase above Rossi, then we will know it is planted votes.
7+7=14
Thats as far as I got
Agree, that is why we must hope and pray that goodnesswins. ;-)
I observed the Kitsap County recount.
It could be our optical scanners are poor. Or...
I happened to watch a table of two older gentlemen, late 60's and 70's. In addition to the Republican one setting a Rossi vote into the overcount pile, the two men had many problems counting the ballots and batching them in groups of 25 as they were supposed to do. (I got the Rossi vote out of the overvote pile after talking with our county auditor)
Each party rep is supposed to count the other party's ballots first and batch them into groups of 25. Well the Republican party rep kept under batching the Gregoire votes creating a superficially increased count for her. The Democrat consistently overbatched the Rossi votes creating a superficially decreased count for Rossi. Now whenever the numbers they report don't match the machine count, the table's election official has to come back to the table and tell the two they need to count again. So the two switch and count their own party's ballots. This is where I observed the numbers changing and realized the batching problem. Towards the end of the day, the Dem had one precinct that he mistakenly hid 8 votes for Rossi. Now I don't think there was fraud intent there, just human error in a repetitive task hard for older hands to do.
But I certainly see now where there's room for human error.
Thanks for the information.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.