Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recount by the numbers: partial results from WASHINGTON STATE hand-recount (Dino Rossi).
Sound Politica (blog) ^ | December 09, 2004 | Stefan Sharkansky

Posted on 12/11/2004 7:53:21 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi

Recount by the numbers Here are some interesting numbers to mull over:

Counties reported: 10, representing ~4% of the statewide vote Rossi's lead over Gregoire in the counties that have reported: +683, or a margin of +0.6686% Net new two-party votes since the machine recount: +57, an increase of 0.06%

In the remaining 29 counties, Gregoire led the machine recount by 640 votes, or a margin of 0.0242%.

In order for Gregoire to win (or tie), she would need to increase that lead of 640 votes to 683 votes, a 6.7% increase. Simply put, either she has to get the same 0.0242% margin on a 6.7% larger pool of votes than there were in the machine recount, or she needs to get a 6.7% larger margin on the same number of ballots. To grow the unrecounted pool by 6.7% requires another 178,000 ballots. That's a little optimistic, even for Paul Berendt, who thinks there are 15,000 valid ballots in the REJECT pile. The reporting counties only grew their pool of two-party ballots by 0.06%, which would translate into 1,475 such ballots from the remaining counties. The machine recount produced 2,300 new ballots in those counties, so you never know. In any event. It's still a small enough increase that she would still need to increase her margin by essentially the same 6.7% to 0.0258%.

Here's where we do some of the math that will only produce horselaughs from those who try to make statistical arguments without using any actual numbers or formulas.

Gregoire's lead in the 29 remaining counties in the first count was 0.0163%. If you look at her leads in the two counts: (0.0163%, 0.0242%) you can calculate sample mean, standard error and a t-statistic of 1.41. This tells us that there is slightly less than a 20% chance for the next count to give Gregoire a lead of 0.0258% or greater. i.e, based on the information we have available today, we can be 80% confident that Rossi will win the 3rd recount.

Of course, this number will be revised (and can change significantly) as new information becomes available. A Supreme Court order to change the way that the recount is conducted could change this number by quite a lot. In the meantime, if you are a Democrat who is contemplating a job in the Gregoire administration, but you have another job offer that you have to decide on by today, you might not want to forfeit a 100% sure thing for a 20% long shot.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at December 09, 2004 09:54 PM


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: activism; counties; dinorossi; election; governor; gregoire; handrecount; italoamerican; kingcounty; numbers; recount; republicans; rossi; seattle; stolenelection; thirdrecount; victory; vote; votes; wa; washington
Please update, if you get at other news. Thanks.

Alessandro

1 posted on 12/11/2004 7:53:22 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

A couple hundred extra ballots tossed in or found in bathrooms or locked cabinets, in major counties will throw these numbers to the wind.


2 posted on 12/11/2004 8:04:04 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Manual recount results are not final or official until certified by the counties. The results posted on this site are unofficial as some counties have not presented results to the county canvassing board for final certification. The Secretary of State is projecting that all counties will have certified results by December 23, 2004. After all counties have certified results, the Secretary of State will file an amended abstract of the manual recount returns that will be the final count of the Governor’s race.

MANUAL RECOUNT RESULTS BY COUNTY Machine Recount Results by County

NOTE: Gain/Loss results are only available for counties with 100% of precincts reporting.

GOVERNOR
County Christine Gregoire(D) Dino Rossi(R) Ruth Bennett(L)
Manual Recount Machine Recount Gain/Loss Manual Recount Machine Recount Gain/Loss Manual Recount Machine Recount Gain/Loss
Adams 1,529 1,529 0 3,481 3,486 -5 81 81 0
Asotin 0 3,525 N/A 0 4,904 N/A 0 193 N/A
Benton 0 19,831 N/A 0 44,890 N/A 0 1,118 N/A
Chelan 0 10,077 N/A 0 18,437 N/A 0 523 N/A
Clallam 16,230 16,226 +4 18,836 18,832 +4 920 919 +1
Clark 0 72,800 N/A 0 85,894 N/A 0 4,123 N/A
Columbia 671 671 0 1,371 1,370 +1 37 37 0
Cowlitz 0 20,207 N/A 0 20,047 N/A 0 1,093 N/A
Douglas 0 4,359 N/A 0 8,666 N/A 0 219 N/A
Ferry 1,278 1,278 0 1,900 1,900 0 118 118 0
Franklin 0 4,967 N/A 0 10,619 N/A 0 227 N/A
Garfield 428 428 0 840 840 0 25 25 0
Grant 0 7,826 N/A 0 17,429 N/A 0 535 N/A
Grays Harbor 13,729 13,719 +10 13,457 13,449 +8 575 575 0
Island 0 16,888 N/A 0 19,997 N/A 0 814 N/A
Jefferson 10,650 10,642 +8 7,295 7,289 +6 466 466 0
King 0 505,836 N/A 0 351,127 N/A 0 18,936 N/A
Kitsap 56,236 56,164 +72 57,775 57,693 +82 3,097 3,090 +7
Kittitas 0 6,125 N/A 0 9,567 N/A 0 277 N/A
Klickitat 0 3,919 N/A 0 4,767 N/A 0 265 N/A
Lewis 10,247 10,245 +2 20,851 20,842 +9 757 756 +1
Lincoln 1,850 1,850 0 3,686 3,686 0 100 100 0
Mason 11,797 11,788 +9 12,519 12,507 +12 680 682 -2
Okanogan 0 6,101 N/A 0 9,450 N/A 0 465 N/A
Pacific 5,210 5,210 0 4,730 4,730 0 296 295 +1
Pend Oreille 2,567 2,567 0 3,368 3,366 +2 179 179 0
Pierce 0 145,199 N/A 0 157,704 N/A 0 7,241 N/A
San Juan 0 5,872 N/A 0 3,660 N/A 0 321 N/A
Skagit 0 23,266 N/A 0 27,224 N/A 0 1,267 N/A
Skamania 2,233 2,232 +1 2,525 2,522 +3 178 178 0
Snohomish 0 139,070 N/A 0 145,553 N/A 0 6,852 N/A
Spokane 0 90,573 N/A 0 105,569 N/A 0 3,878 N/A
Stevens 6,992 6,992 0 12,295 12,293 +2 566 566 0
Thurston 0 58,955 N/A 0 49,413 N/A 0 2,574 N/A
Wahkiakum 993 993 0 1,099 1,100 -1 61 61 0
Walla Walla 8,008 8,006 +2 14,290 14,277 +13 378 381 -3
Whatcom 0 44,056 N/A 0 41,978 N/A 0 2,177 N/A
Whitman 0 7,715 N/A 0 9,363 N/A 0 457 N/A
Yakima 0 24,735 N/A 0 46,044 N/A 0 1,351 N/A
Totals 150,648
(44.3761%)
1,372,442
(48.8702%)
+108 180,318
(53.1159%)
1,372,484
(48.8717%)
+136 8,514
(2.5080%)
63,415
(2.2581%)
+5

Results last updated on: 12/10/2004 4:26:00 PM


3 posted on 12/11/2004 8:05:50 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

The only way rats can win major elections these days is by CHEATING....VOTER FRAUD!!!


4 posted on 12/11/2004 8:10:21 AM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Isn't there a law that states, "vote recounting will continue until a minimum one vote margin exists in favor of the Democrat candidate. At that time all recountiung is ordered to stop"?


5 posted on 12/11/2004 8:15:48 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

King County will NOT be NORMAL.....they'll do everything they can to find the right number of votes to win there....EVERYTHING. It's where most of the commies in Washington, the State, live.


6 posted on 12/11/2004 8:18:19 AM PST by goodnesswins (Tax cuts, Tax reform, social security reform, Supreme Court, etc.....the next 4 years.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

I hope not. Anyway, if we are up about 500 votes before King results, we should win.


7 posted on 12/11/2004 8:20:25 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Sharkansky's math is great...but his politics is a bit lacking. This won't be about trends and math. It will be about King County. That's the only county that "counts" in this effort to steal. Berendt doesn't need 178,000 new ballots or even 15,000 new ballots -- because mathematical trends are rendered meaningless when the effort is strictly political. He needs half-a-hundred or so (give or take) of the right ballots from Seattle. King County will do things with their count and their interpretations of state law that no other county in the state will. We are now into the realm of "interpretation" -- and as LBJ always said, you keep counting and counting until you are ahead. Then you stop. The RATS know LBJ very well.
8 posted on 12/11/2004 8:29:24 AM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

No doubt King County will not report until last, so they know how many votes they have to find.


9 posted on 12/11/2004 9:19:12 AM PST by ecurbh () | () | ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Reply from Washingotn State :) ANYTIME you want to come for a visit here, let us know! Great home page, BTW. The WA FReepers are heavily involved in working to keep our twice elected Governor, Dino Rossi. After 20 years of democrats running our state down the toilet, it is truly time for a change. We need some updated legislation and new judges as well. Yesterday, a judge threw out the testimony of a mother in a robbery case. Apparently she listened to her teenage daughter talk to a boyfriend about how he assualted and robbed an elderly woman; taking her wallet. The judge said since WA State has a law banning the RECORDING of a third person conversation, the two litle hoodlums had a "reasonable expectation" of "privacy" and he would not allow the mom's testimony. So the vicious little thief was released from jail. It is difficult sometimes to comprehend how messed up humans can become... Thanks for posting the article! And 3 cheers for Economics!
10 posted on 12/11/2004 9:30:47 AM PST by Libertina (Dino Rossi - elected TWICE as Governor of Washington State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

What happened in Kitsap County with the manual recount?

They just set the precendent for hundreds of new "votes", for King County to emulate.


11 posted on 12/11/2004 9:35:26 AM PST by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nj26
"What happened in Kitsap County with the manual recount?"

Kitsap 56,236 56,164 +72 57,775 57,693 +82 3,097 3,090 +7

It does make you wonder what happened with the machine counting that they would pick up so many more than other counties did. But the increase was still on par one with the other, just like all the other counties that have been counted. So we can assume that King County will be the same.

If there is a big jump in votes for Gregoire, more than 42 increase above Rossi, then we will know it is planted votes.

12 posted on 12/11/2004 10:05:34 AM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

7+7=14


Thats as far as I got


13 posted on 12/11/2004 10:10:08 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
King County will NOT be NORMAL.....they'll do everything they can to find the right number of votes to win there...

Agree, that is why we must hope and pray that goodnesswins. ;-)

14 posted on 12/11/2004 10:26:01 AM PST by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nj26; Spunky

I observed the Kitsap County recount.

It could be our optical scanners are poor. Or...

I happened to watch a table of two older gentlemen, late 60's and 70's. In addition to the Republican one setting a Rossi vote into the overcount pile, the two men had many problems counting the ballots and batching them in groups of 25 as they were supposed to do. (I got the Rossi vote out of the overvote pile after talking with our county auditor)

Each party rep is supposed to count the other party's ballots first and batch them into groups of 25. Well the Republican party rep kept under batching the Gregoire votes creating a superficially increased count for her. The Democrat consistently overbatched the Rossi votes creating a superficially decreased count for Rossi. Now whenever the numbers they report don't match the machine count, the table's election official has to come back to the table and tell the two they need to count again. So the two switch and count their own party's ballots. This is where I observed the numbers changing and realized the batching problem. Towards the end of the day, the Dem had one precinct that he mistakenly hid 8 votes for Rossi. Now I don't think there was fraud intent there, just human error in a repetitive task hard for older hands to do.

But I certainly see now where there's room for human error.


15 posted on 12/12/2004 2:12:05 PM PST by WKL815
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WKL815

Thanks for the information.


16 posted on 12/12/2004 3:36:10 PM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson