Posted on 12/03/2004 11:00:39 PM PST by ChristianDefender
I'm sorry, but that's way over the line. It would be far better to deport everyone over here, especially the so-called "students", and then shut down the U. N. building and have them move their organization out of the United States. Also, we should stop ALL foreign aid and resume on a case by case basis. As far as a Palestinian state, Israel could do what ever they damned well pleased.
Sounds like a plan, but must go along with deporting EVERY Muslim from America, citizen or not. It's not a First Amendment protected religion, but a bloodthirsty political cult hellbent on world domination, much like the NAZI Party.
They have stated this more clearly than Hitler did in Mein Kampf! It's time to believe their threats and the bloody threats contained in the Koran and rid ourselves of them.
Without the financial and moral support of their brethren back home in Mecca, those living in the states will fade into the woodwork once we show some resolve. But it's never going to happen. Not even if we are attacked. Whoops, we were. And Iran should have been the first stop.
Thanks for your replies...INDEED...America should impose MASS MUSLIM DEPORTATION.. they hated America to their bones yet they keep on sticking their ar$e in the country in hope for a better life...
...Throwing out the Virus inside America is one effective way... include the Dems if they protest, if Towelheads still insist in attacking, then UNLEASH the POWER...
I've been calling for this for the last 2 years and my friends thought I was crazy. Glad to see at least one more crazy person out there!!
:)
And I took Islam in college...at a Catholic university mind you. I think 99% of Muslims are wonderful people. But I agree that if this is held over their heads, it would certainly make a lot of them think twice. Furthermore, it would entice those 99% to clamp down on the 1% nut cases and possibly bring them to justice.
The plan has one major flaw: Moslems the world over have made plenty of people mad at them. What if one of those angry parties sees this as a fast way to rid the world of this contagious metal disease and sets off a nuke here just to get the US to do their dirty work?
It should be Phase I. However, Phase II should be to deport all illegals in this country, concurrent with tightening our borders.
Some type of attack in the future will happen. They will want to top 911 and that will mean the use of WMD. We must continue with our preemption doctrine. The hardest part is to get this NATION to come to grips with the fact that these Islamofacists WANT TO DESTROY AMERICA, our way of life and WESTERN CIVILISATION!!
We need to take it soon to IRAN and North Korea for within 5-7 years they will become verifiably Nuclear Powers.
Also, what if causing a nuclear attack on Islamics by the USA is EXACTLY what OBL & Co. want?
It would cause worldwide condemnation of the USA.
It would unite the Islamic world against us, far more than it is now.
Many other countries would ally with the non-American side.
We will need to respond harshly to a WMD attack, but nuking 100 Islamic cities would be counter-productive at best. At worst, it would cause total war.
Currently, the USA dominates the world. A World War is just about the last thing we want, and nuking a bunch of Islamics is a very good way to have that happen.
Why wait? We debated doing it during the Cold War. We gave it very, very serious consideration. And so did the Rooskies.
But now we are dealing with the world's real mad dogs. Why wait for them to hit us first?
Also, I'm glad to see him throw in N. Korea. They are, of course, the source of this latest proliferation and deserve to be taken out. But notice I said "latest." If muslims are acting as a kind of surrogate for the North Koreans, the North Koreans are acting as surrogates for China.
"What if one of those angry parties sees this as a fast way to rid the world of this contagious metal disease and sets off a nuke here just to get the US to do their dirty work?"
Why would that be a problem?
BTTT
"Also, what if causing a nuclear attack on Islamics by the USA is EXACTLY what OBL & Co. want?"
Your thinking is rather shallow on this... Same results either way.
Wow, it takes WingNutDaily a good 3 years to catch up with an idea that several hundred morons on FR have each individually imagined that they were the first to develop in their own brilliant minds and then proudly posted on (usually complete with link to cool nuclear fireball pic.)
Bravo.
I should sit down and figure out how many Americans you'd kill in those attacks. And non-Muslims foreigners.
And of course, OBL in his wildest wet dreams fantasizes about the US doing something like what this article proposes.
Too stupid for words.
MAD worked in part during the Cold War because both sides had thousands of nukes, so could reasonably worry that if they didn't respond massively and instantly, they might never respond at all, in any way whatsover beyond a few lucky survivors with handguns in the Pacific coastal wilderness areas.
The terrorists present no such threat to us. They might could take out a big chunk of a couple of cities. The existence of the United States would not be seriously at risk.
The only serious threat that the initiator of a massive nuclear strike had was from an immediate and massive retaliation.
We can take out the Islamic nations with far less loss of life, so we would.
Indeed, if you were President, I trust that even you would refuse to actually pull the trigger on such an instant wasting of hundreds of millions of people, in retaliation for the murder of hundreds of thousands of Americans.
An eye for an eye, perhaps ten eyes for an eye, but certainly not a thousand eyes for each eye.
Not right. Immoral. Plain and simple.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.