[hleewilder]

I'm sorry, but that's way over the line. It would be far better to deport everyone over here, especially the so-called "students", and then shut down the U. N. building and have them move their organization out of the United States. Also, we should stop ALL foreign aid and resume on a case by case basis. As far as a Palestinian state, Israel could do what ever they damned well pleased.

[SideoutFred]

I've been calling for this for the last 2 years and my friends thought I was crazy. Glad to see at least one more crazy person out there!!

:)

And I took Islam in college...at a Catholic university mind you. I think 99% of Muslims are wonderful people. But I agree that if this is held over their heads, it would certainly make a lot of them think twice. Furthermore, it would entice those 99% to clamp down on the 1% nut cases and possibly bring them to justice.

[PISANO]

I fail to see how your suggestions can STOP a WMD attack. I honestly, DON'T see how this "REVISED" MAD doctrine will stop an attack either. When you have fanatics hell bent on being a martyr so they can get 72 cherries and a seat at the table with Allah, logic is useless.

Some type of attack in the future will happen. They will want to top 911 and that will mean the use of WMD. We must continue with our preemption doctrine. The hardest part is to get this NATION to come to grips with the fact that these Islamofacists WANT TO DESTROY AMERICA, our way of life and WESTERN CIVILISATION!!

We need to take it soon to IRAN and North Korea for within 5-7 years they will become verifiably Nuclear Powers.

[thegreatbeast]

It's far from over the line; it's our only protection against one of these outlaw states from hooking the terrorists up with everything they need.
And while it may not have been this specific strategy, shortly after the president made his "you are either with us or against us" speech to the UN shortly after 911, emissaries from the US made direct contact with most of the governments on the planet and laid out something very similar to this strategy as being our trump card should we be attacked with WMD.

[PeoplesRepublicOfWashington]

Every raghead should have been deported on Sept. 12, 2001. I do like the MAD proposal, but including every Islamic nation is going too far. For one thing, taking out Islamic society world wide would sentence Israel to a radiological death.

What puzzles me is why we regard terrorism in higher regard than nuclear war. If we'd nuke an insurgent-held city in Iraq for every car bomb or IED that they set off and every beheading performed, we'd see a sudden drop in terrorist activity.

[A Navy Vet]

"It would be far better to deport everyone over here, especially the so-called "students", and then shut down the U. N. building and have them move their organization out of the United States. Also, we should stop ALL foreign aid and resume on a case by case basis."

Not that I agree with the thesis of this article, what you suggest is not going to happen either. Any other ideas?

[ChefKeith]

I'm sorry, but that's way over the line.So were the attacks of 9/11!

It would be far better to deport everyone over here, especially the so-called "students",All deportation does is piss them off and set them free to sneak back over here and be part of the problem. If you want to do something with these "people" then kill them off to avoid any future trouble out of them!

and then shut down the U. N. building The trouble with that is the Daddy Rockefeller gave the UN the property they are on, it is sovereign territory like an embassy is and it is not part of the U.S.A.

and have them move their organization out of the United States.All that will do is move them, not eliminate them

Also, we should stop ALL foreign aid and resume on a case by case basis. As far as a Palestinian state, Israel could do what ever they damned well pleased.This I agree with.

[Beckwith]

I'm sorry, but that's way over the line.

OK, we got 2,000,000 dead in New York City, 4,000,000 wounded and 14,000,000 exposed to high levels of radiation.

And your answer is deportation?

Get real.

[ALASKA]

Since this would be a similar, yet different policy and would be applied to a different situation, I think it should be called something else. We could still call it MAD, let's just let the acronym mean MUSLIM ASSURED DESTRUCTION.

[Lazamataz]

I'm sorry, but that's way over the line.

I don't think it goes far enough.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state, and destroy all of the military facilities of Islamic-dominated states.

I agree. As warm and cuddly as that doctrine makes me feel, it would have dire side effects. Not least of which would be that any American life, anywhere on the globe wouldn't be worth a wet slap. Especially our people in uniform. The Phillipines, Japan and Korea would all be places where wholesale slaughter of our people would take place even before the dust settles on what used to be Damascus.

[No Surrender No Retreat]

Your response is one of logical thinking as to this cancer is concerned. My thoughts are, "Power Perceived Is Power Achieved." However we are dealing with hoodwinked zealots who think death is a one way ticket to allah and the 72 camel booties. I hope we are never attacked, but we must be prepared to (unleash hell) on those responsible a thousandfold. Your plan would be a good one and mine as a backup, is competent as well. I hope we never have to resort to my plan, but we must be prepared. NSNR

[nyconse]

No it's not over the line....these people do not fear deportation. We must come up with a plan that would cause real fear...this plan would do the trick. You don't even have to get into the country to use a nuke - Mexico (near the US border) would do just fine. The threat to destroy all Islamic cities and individuals is a bold move, but if we were attacked what choice would have....sit around and sing kubyah while waiting for the next bomb? We would have to eliminate the threat, and the threat comes from Islam and its evil societies. Best to warn the decent (if there are any) people in Muslim society that aligning themeselves with the terrorists will ensure their destruction.

[scannell]

I'm sorry, but that's way over the line.

So a policy that permits the terrorists to pursue nukes (which they are doing) and detonate in the US (which they want to do) that dosen't impose a cold war style threat on the countries that harbor these terrorists IS NOT OVER THE LINE. You have to join the U.S. side on this debate otherwise we'll lose this war by default.

[ninenot]

Agreed. The author of the piece obviously studied Moral Theology under the direction of Herr Doktor Mengele.

[FrankRepublican]

I agree about the deportations. We have 500,000 Iraqis and millions of Muslims in America. Send them to Iraq to die for their democracy.

Why should American boys die if Bush keeps pushing for open borders. Unless we are serious about deporting illegals especially Muslims then the "war on terror" is a farce.

[O.C. - Old Cracker]

Everything you said was spot on with the exception of stopping aid to Israel. I'm all for shipping ALL Muslims, regardless of nationality, out of the U.S., and for closing the doors on the U.N.

[Mr. K]

dammmm!! now THAT'S a plan!!! good one dude!