Posted on 11/28/2004 8:00:07 AM PST by marway
Terry Nichols confessed during secret plea negotiations last year that he had a major role in the deadly 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. He also stated that he knew of no other conspirators in the attack that left 168 dead, including 19 children.
"I am unaware as to who was involved in the planning besides McVeigh,'' he stated.
However, Nichols refused to disclose where he hid stolen blasting caps left over from the making of the bomb.
Nichols, 49, never testified at his 1997 federal trial or this year's state trial. His attorneys claimed he had no part in the attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. They suggested McVeigh had help from others and set up Nichols to take the blame.
Nichols was convicted at his federal trial of the bombing conspiracy and manslaughter of eight federal agents.
He was convicted at his state trial of arson, conspiracy to commit arson and 161 counts of first-degree murder.
The state case focused on the 160 other casualties, as well as the loss of a fetus.
Nichols was sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of release in both cases. He avoided the death penalty because jurors could not agree on that punishment.
Nichols made the admission last year as part of an effort to persuade state prosecutors to drop their request for a death sentence. The negotiations fell through because prosecutors thought he was not forthcoming enough.
Oklahoma County District Attorney Wes Lane said Saturday: "Although I had nothing to do with the release of this document, I cannot say that I am disappointed that the public finally gets a glimpse of my frustration with Terry Nichols, and his refusal to tell us where certain bomb-making materials are still hidden, even to this day... ''
(Excerpt) Read more at newsok.com ...
Boo-hoo for you! Maybe if you "pretty-pleased' him? He's got life without parole - what possible incentive could you give him to make him want to talk to YOU anymore?
If he's still protecting the blasting caps, why would we
assume he's not still protecting John Doe #2?
Call me a cynic, but the only possible reason he would not reveal "where certain bomb-making materials are still hidden, even to this day" is that there aren't any.
The purpose of a plea bargain is to close the books on a case with a notch in the prosecutor's belt.
The purpose of a plea bargain is NOT to find the truth.
My guess would be that Mr. Nichols signed whatever papers were put in front of him by the prosecutor, regardless of their veracity, just to get the death penalty off the table.
Exactly.
What about those trips to the Phillipines, Terry?
Jayna Davis - THE THIRD TERRORIST - heavily documents the ME involvement in OKC
And his living family members
I have a question: How many other Federal prisoners have been executed since Tim McVey was?
Answer:
Since 1963 only three people have been executed by the federal government of the United States:
Louis Jones on March 18, 2003 for rape and murder of Pvt. Tracie McBride
Juan Raul Garza on June 19, 2001 for murdering three persons in conjunction with a drug-smuggling ring
Timothy McVeigh on June 11, 2001 for the Oklahoma City bombing
Source link: http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/List%20of%20individuals%20executed%20by%20the%20United%20States
Why was there such a rush to execute McVey?
[Just asking.....]
Between 1950 and 1963, 13 people were executed (not counting those executed under military law)
From 1963 until Tim McVey in June 2001, zero were executed.
It's generally accepted that prisoners threatened to the death sentence may be willing to stretch the truth or to lie outright in order to strike a plea bargain. So saying that he "knew of" no other conspirator doesn't necessarily mean very much.
I can't imagine why he would hesitate to say where the blasting caps were buried if he knew. So maybe he didn't know. But it is easily conceivable that he might withhold evidence to protect a co-conspirator. And it's also conceivable that the prosecutor refused to entertain the idea that there were other conspirators, under pressure from the FBI and political authorities.
In other words, this bogus press release of a statement that was never signed or agreed to doesn't mean very much when weighed against a great deal of evidence that there were a number of other participants in the bombing.
If my memory serves me correctly, I believe McVeigh refused any further appeals. I would suspect that the others you mentioned drew out the appeals process as long as they could.
Dont kill him, send him to Gitmo and find out what he was doing in the Phillipines with potential Al Qaeda associates.
The book The Third Terrorist was so well researched and written that Davis has convinced several friends of mine who previously thought her theories were all tinfoil hat stuff.
Former CIA chief, James Woolsey endorsed her work and I wish he'd speak about it more frequently.
A building blew up. 168 dead, hundreds injured.
Oh - I see now, people are up to their necks in conspiracy theories.... forget I was ever here.
They could check the status of the OKC survivors v. Iraq filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia two years ago. Is it still on going? I don't know.
They could ask former CIA Director James Woolsey, what he meant when he said, "When the full stories of these two incidents (1993 WTC Center bombing and 1995 Oklahoma City bombing) are finally told, those who permitted the investigations to stop short will owe big explanations to these two brave women (Middle East expert Laurie Mylroie and journalist Jayna Davis). And the nation will owe them a debt of gratitude." "The Iraq Connection," Wall Street Journal, September 5, 2002
Or how about this, in his discussions about his Vanity Fair interview with a top Pentagon official Sam Tanenhaus suggested that Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz believes there just may be a Saddam connection to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
Yes, IMO it's the more that they are worried about and I don't mean Michael.
P.S. What ever happend to Sen. Spector's promise to Jayna Davis to do something?
It doesn't sound to me as if Nichols is saying he "knew of no other consirator," so much as he is saying he did not know the other conspirators. Consider:
McVeigh was very careful to make sure that all discussions were held in private between him and I and, it seems, between him and others.(Note also that the meaning of "planning" here might be Clintonesque.)I am unaware as to who was involved in the planning besides McVeigh.
ML/NJ
Sounds like many freepers need to read, The Third Terrorist by Jayna Davis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.