Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Character Matters (The Real Clinton Legacy)
The George Washington University Hatchet ^ | November 22, 2004 | Gary J. Livacari

Posted on 11/23/2004 5:37:06 PM PST by GaryL

You remember the 1990s? Those wonderful Clinton years, when liberal Democrats, led by the great moralist James Carville, incessantly told us, "Character doesn't matter." Well, it's time to slap another egg on Carville's head because he and his party have been proven dead wrong again.

During the Clinton impeachment proceedings, Republicans were forbidden from merely questioning the President's unethical behavior. Just in case you have forgotten, Clinton used his presidential stature to seduce a young, female intern in the Oval Office. To make matters even worse, he perjured himself in a court of law and coerced others to do the same, an offense that resulted in his being disbarred. Of course to Democrats, these actions were totally irrelevant in judging Clinton's presidency. After all, "character doesn't matter." As long as the economy was good, and the world was seemingly peaceful, who really cared about such petty matters as character and values. Right? Wrong.

Much to the surprise and dismay of secular liberals, character does matter to the American people. They made this point clear on Nov. 2 by giving President Bush a popular victory. As the exit polls illustrate, Bush enjoyed powerful support from Christian evangelicals and voters who strongly emphasized "moral values." Undoubtedly, such support stems from the Democrats' reflexive hostility toward organized religion. Not to mention the fact that they are just plain "out of touch" with mainstream America on most social issues. Don't believe me? Look at any post-mortem Maureen Dowd or Paul Krugman diatribe in the New York Times. These elitist whiners still don't get it; character matters.

John Kerry obviously lost big on the issue of moral values. However, on a deeper level, it is apparent that Americans no longer trust Democrats to keep the country safe, especially in this post 9/11 world where national security constantly hangs in the balance. Setting religious convictions aside, by a margin of 57 percent to 41 percent, voters did not trust Sen. Kerry to handle the threat of terrorism. Conversely, by the same margin voters said they trusted Bush to handle the threat. As CNN's William Schneider further reports, "Most voters described Kerry not as a man who says what he believes, but as a man who says what he thinks people want to hear (56 to 40 percent)."

These are all devastating indictments of the Democratic Party and they have only themselves to blame. Given the Clintonian contention that presidential character is irrelevant, such public perceptions should be expected. This is a party that somehow defended a chronic philanderer and admitted perjurer as a suitable commander in chief. Why are they surprised that they have suddenly lost the trust of the American people?

Clinton might have left the presidency as a popular figure, but he did irreparable damage to his party. In fact, Democrats are still paying for it today with John Kerry being the most recent casualty. Clinton's misconduct forced the party to defend the indefensible - to resort to unfathomable lows to protect his legacy. By doing so, Democrats dismissed the essential presidential qualities of character, morality and virtue. This may have worked in the '90s, when the public was hopelessly immersed in naiveté and superficiality. But now we live in a different world, under the constant threat of Islamist terrorism. With American troops in harm's way, character matters and the American people demand it in their president.

Distraught Democrats looking to understand character may take guidance from President Bush's remarks at the Republican National Convention, "And in those military families, I have seen the character of a great nation, decent, idealistic and strong." The nation has also seen such character in President Bush - in his steadfast pursuit of freedom, despite enormous political opposition, in the Middle East and security for the American people. They saw his character when he rallied America with a bullhorn amid the fallen Twin Towers, and they see it as he tenderly comforts the families of fallen U.S. soldiers. With President Bush set for a second term, we are surely a far cry from the "character doesn't matter" days of the 1990s. That's one thing to be thankful for this holiday season.

-The writer, a sophomore majoring in political communications, is a Hatchet columnist.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; character; clinton; clintonlegacy; elction2004; moralvalues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
The author, who is my son, is the only conservative writer on the liberal GWU Hatchet staff.
1 posted on 11/23/2004 5:37:06 PM PST by GaryL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GaryL

You've raised a fine young man...and a darned good writer.


2 posted on 11/23/2004 5:42:20 PM PST by DCPatriot (I don't do politically correct very well either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

You should be very proud of him - it is an outstanding article.


3 posted on 11/23/2004 5:44:09 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

Congratulations. The faculty must be grinding their teeth.


4 posted on 11/23/2004 5:44:29 PM PST by Cicero (Nil illegitemus carborundum est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
"Clinton might have left the presidency as a popular figure, but he did irreparable damage to his party. In fact, Democrats are still paying for it today with John Kerry being the most recent casualty. Clinton's misconduct forced the party to defend the indefensible - to resort to unfathomable lows to protect his legacy. "

Gosh it is nice to read stuff like this. Clinton still confuses people and political consultants. The Democrats don't get yet that Clinton actually won biggest when he was playing "Republican Lite" and not Democrat.

Hillary still plays the "move to the middle" dance... even though she is a socialist.
5 posted on 11/23/2004 5:48:18 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: GaryL; Mia T; ClintonHater

Very nice.


7 posted on 11/23/2004 5:49:50 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

Very well done.


8 posted on 11/23/2004 5:50:00 PM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

I was surprised when I got to the end to find that the writer was only a sophmore. I predict great things for him.


9 posted on 11/23/2004 5:50:08 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

Congratulations on your son. he is a son to be proud of.


10 posted on 11/23/2004 5:50:15 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

In the early 90s Democrats referred to the 80s as the
"decade of greed". By '99 I was referring to the 90s as
the "decade of the economy trumps character".

Of the two decades which one was REALLY the most greedy?

Good article.


11 posted on 11/23/2004 5:51:58 PM PST by Sivad (NorCal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL; B-Bear; Eva; MNLDS; A. Morgan; Spruce; bootless; cajungirl; Samwise; SAMWolf; DallasMike; ...

Ping!


12 posted on 11/23/2004 5:53:34 PM PST by GaryL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

Excellent! You should be proud, and I would bet you are!


13 posted on 11/23/2004 5:53:43 PM PST by ladyinred (Congratulations President Bush! Four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

Dems will be loading up on "values" and "character" between now and next election.

I've heard a lot of rationalizing in the media by liberals. It goes along the lines that "values" include gender-equality, peace, health care entitlement, etc.

Since 1980 the nation has shifted from being governed by democrats, to being governed by Republicans. Trendwise. By 2008 democrats will have had 8 of 28 years for president.

Their former big majority in Congress has gone away. In states, they are losing ground. And by 2008 will likely have only a minority on the USSC.

With such a poor trend, a rational thinker would question: "What are we doing wrong? Why do fewer people vote for us?"

But the dems sound like they are in denial. That goes with insanity.

Doing the same thing, over and over, expecting different results.


14 posted on 11/23/2004 5:57:45 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

Nice work! Suggest they change the name of the publication to "The Tomahawk" (not P.C.? tough.) or something. I'd hate for any Dan Rathers of the future to refer to him as "an ex-Hatchet man." May he set a new example and leave them in the dustbin of history!


15 posted on 11/23/2004 6:07:51 PM PST by FreeKeys (quotes by and about THE SLIMEBALL : http://freedomkeys.com/slimeball.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot; 45Auto; Cicero; JSteff; Baynative; anniegetyourgun; OldFriend; Bahbah; Ditter; Sivad; ...
Thanks for all your kind remarks! Yes, my wife and I are very proud of him.

He almost got bounced off the GWU staff recently. Shortly before the election, he was "called into the office" by his (liberal) editors and told that his writing was becoming too partisan, they were getting complaints, etc. So this latest article reflects a style that is quite a bit "toned down. " Thanks again!
16 posted on 11/23/2004 6:09:54 PM PST by GaryL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

Did you hear at the Clinton library dedication, Hillary actually tried to pass herself off as an evangelical Christian?


17 posted on 11/23/2004 6:13:07 PM PST by GaryL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

You have got to be sooooooo proud. There's hope yet. Incredibly well written, I might add.


18 posted on 11/23/2004 6:15:44 PM PST by EDINVA (a FReeper in PJ's beats a CBS anchor in a suit every time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

LOL! Ex-Hatchet man!


19 posted on 11/23/2004 6:16:03 PM PST by GaryL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
WOW! Great mind and a great writer. He has wonderful things in front of him. If he is too partisan for the editors, how many liberals (x) write there to? Saying he has to be x times more partisan because he is the only conservative writer might be an argument.
20 posted on 11/23/2004 6:16:58 PM PST by Andyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson