Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vindicating the Serbian People: An 'Aerial' Counter-Attack
Serbianna ^ | Friday, November 12, 2004 | T.V. Weber

Posted on 11/12/2004 5:28:06 AM PST by Calpernia

The last of Clinton’s bombs fell on Serbia over five years ago. But now, America is focused on another war, so that the media in the U.S. can treat Clinton’s debacle in the Balkans, and its ongoing aftermath, as though they were yesterday’s news. It is easy to see why the American public has not yet come to terms with a number of vital issues connected with those events.

Unanswered Questions in the Balkans:

Where is the evidence of “ethnic cleansing” in Kosovo - and where are those “mass graves”?

Each war gets a different media “spin.” The direction of “spin” depends upon whether the media intend to help or to hurt the current administration. For several years, the U.S. media have been relentlessly harping upon the question of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, and demanding to know whether any of them have been found. We know that Iraq once had them. We know that they once used them. We know that Iraq did not side with the U.S. in the so-called “war on terrorism.” (Considering that radical factions of Islam have declared war on the U.S., it is a nonsequitor to declare war on a tactic rather than an enemy. See Rip Snortin' Van Winkle & Strange Bedfellows--Then and Now for our earlier comments.) We know that Saddam Hussein publicly offered large sums of money to the families of suicide bombers. Yet we keep encountering the same public expressions of outrage in the U.S. Many continue to ask, “Where are those weapons that were supposed to be in Iraq?”

Well, Serbia was never allied with anyone who attacked the US—never ever! Out of the blue, the Clinton-dominated media began concocting tales of “ethnic cleansing” that accused the Serbs of atrocities comparable to those of the Third Reich. As the war against the Serbian people raged on, the American public was fed a steady diet of what were purported to be “aerial photos of mass graves.” So, five years later, where are those “mass graves”?

Why won’t the current administration in the U.S. denounce Clinton’s support of bin Laden’s allies in the Balkans?

We are getting almost daily reports of the ongoing mess that has followed the Bushes’ war in Iraq. This is a valid concern. Many have pointed out the dismal failure of America’s attempt to force its own idea of “democracy” on the Iraqi people.

But where is the outrage over the mess that US foreign policy has made in Kosovo? The people that the U.S. and its NATO allies were allegedly fighting to protect were, and still are, the worst violators of minority rights on the planet.

Following my article, The Tale of Two Shquiptars, I heard from a number of individuals who claimed to be young Albanians. They all engaged in polite dialog. They all told me, in one way or another, that Islam played no role in the reasons for the conflict between their people and the Serbs in Kosovo. They also scoffed at my claims that al-Qaeda and the KLA had any connection with that war. In every other way, their stories diverged so much that they each seemed to be talking about a different conflict. Most of them asked me to set the folks at Serbianna straight.

After I referred them all to the detailed information available on Emperors Clothes at Bin Laden in the Balkans, none of them could give me a cogent reason to doubt the information presented there. Since then, we have received permission from Emperors Clothes to post the data on our website, www.tvweber.com, also, at www.tvweber.com/binLaden_KLA.htm. So why won’t the current administration in the U.S. denounce Clinton’s support of bin Laden’s allies in the Balkans?

Taking It to the Air

One of the reasons for getting my book to press was that it would afford an opportunity to vindicate the Serbs. The title of the book, The Crumbling Wall Against Tyranny: a/k/a The United States Constitution, does not give the slightest suggestion that there is anything in it that would remotely relate to the Balkans. Even so, in the span of seven pages, the reader sees a clear link between Clinton’s radical Muslim allies in the Balkans and the perpetrators of the 9-11 attack upon the United States. Those tragedies exemplify what can happen when the president is permitted to flout the Constitution with impunity, and to usurp powers not granted to the Presidency under the Constitution.

Using talk radio, we now have a chance to get these messages to the Christian people in America. It is my personal “aerial attack” upon the misinformation and propaganda that bombards us all.

Hence, among the suggested questions for discussion that my publicist sends to radio talk show hosts is: “Why do you call President Clinton, ‘al Qaeda’s man in the White House?’”

With the world listening, I explain in concise, “sound bite” language that Clinton conducted a war against the Christian people of the Balkans, on behalf of bin Laden’s allies. I don’t even need to say the word “Serb.” Some listeners understand immediately; others will need to think about the message first. But a Christian audience should have no trouble getting the message.

If the Crumbling Wall Falls, Tyranny Reigns

My book is about the American system of government, how it should work, and why it no longer works so well. It roundly condemns the actions of those U.S. presidents who have—contrary to their Constitutional status—assumed the powers that allowed Clinton to launch his war against the Serbian people without interference from Congress.

Only Congress has the power to declare war, and there had been no declaration of war, yet Congress sat back and let the war continue. It is illegal for a President to do as Clinton did; yet the American people accepted it. Neither Congress nor the American people attempted to stop him.

The potential for tyranny is great when one man can single-handedly start a war and no one dare raise a hand to stop him.

America at the Crossroads

The bitterness of the 2004 campaign season is one more piece of evidence that the US has lost its Constitutional moorings. Every four years, we can each offer a miniscule degree of input regarding who our next dictator will be. Except for those who have already resigned themselves to the idea of being, in effect, slaves to the government of the United State (intentionally leaving the “s” out of “States), and those who feel that the U.S. is beyond hope, citizens are in absolute horror over the outcome of each election.

With the Clinton administration long out of power, it is time for America to make amends. Both Democrats and Republicans need to take an honest look at Clinton’s failed foreign policy and assume responsibility for setting matters aright.

With the President’s new administration about to begin, there is absolutely NO excuse for retaining anyone in the federal government who still considers the Serbs to be “war criminals,” the Russians to be our “geopolitical rivals,” and the KLA and Bosnian Muslim fanatics to be our “friends.” It is not our purpose to raise the issue of the Constitutional definition of treason, which was once a capital offense rather than a prerequisite for entry into America’s self-styled elite. But it is entirely reasonable to insist that the federal government cease to employ those people in any position of public trust!

The administration needs to look for honest and capable people who are free of racist bigotry against Slavic peoples, and free of religious bigotry against Orthodox Christians. It may even be necessary to recruit candidates from sources other than the Ivy League, the University of Chicago, or the Beltway “think tanks,” which evidently have become breeding grounds for their own particular prejudices and distorted worldviews.

The Serbs have been an ally of the U.S. since there was a free Serbia in the 19th century. Isn’t it time to renounce Clinton’s failed Balkans policy, apologize to the Serbian people, and restore the lands that they have lost due to the wrongful intervention of the American military?

If not, let us remind you of the slogan, “Serbia, the land where empires die.” Who would have expected the once-mighty empire of the Ottoman Turks, the Austro-Hungarian empire of the Hapsburgs, and the formidable Nazi empire of the Third Reich, all to become extinct after picking on tiny Serbia? On what basis do the American government and people claim to be the sole exception to the principles of history and of common sense that apply to everyone else? Is America too blinded by vainglorious pride to see that it is following the same downhill path that landed its old enemies in the dustbin of history?

Far better for the US to swallow its national pride, repent of its errors, and join hands with Serbia in heartfelt cooperation—so that al-Qaeda can be the next empire to die in the Balkans rather than America’s empire.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; balkanalqaeda; balkans; bush; clinton; clintonlegacy; conspiracy; ethniccleansing; iraq; islam; kosovo; media; obl; propaganda; racak; serbia; tinfoilhat; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-359 next last
>>>Why won’t the current administration in the U.S. denounce Clinton’s support of bin Laden’s allies in the Balkans? <<<<<

I do actually find this an interesting statement/question.

1 posted on 11/12/2004 5:28:07 AM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nw_arizona_granny

Ping. Thanks for the email!


2 posted on 11/12/2004 5:28:38 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

AlQuaidas sink-emperor in the whitehouse!!!


3 posted on 11/12/2004 5:34:37 AM PST by Luigi Vasellini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

I don't think the current administration knows or cares much about the Balkans. They want nothing to do with the place... which is fine by me. Hopefully there will be a withdrawal of the remaining US troops in the very near fuutre.


4 posted on 11/12/2004 5:52:46 AM PST by Gavrilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; Alamo-Girl

Interesting thoughts and tidbits here to bookmark for your research.


5 posted on 11/12/2004 5:56:24 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
>>>Why won’t the current administration in the U.S. denounce Clinton’s support of bin Laden’s allies in the Balkans? <<<<<

Good number of people in The State Department and Pentagon have earned the promotions and pension by spreading the lies about Serbs while at the same time aiding and abetting Al Qaeda network in the Balkans. They have vested interest in keeping status quo.

6 posted on 11/12/2004 6:12:40 AM PST by DTA (proud pajamista)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

clinton legacy bump


7 posted on 11/12/2004 6:13:52 AM PST by DTA (proud pajamista)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: DTA

If this is true, I really hope Bush does the housecleaning I've heard rumors about this term.


9 posted on 11/12/2004 6:23:50 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
The Serbians are generally Orthodox Christian and were basically fighting Muslims in this time period. (are they good peaceful bible-believers?, they don't have to be, just more christian than their opponents)

Who do you think Democrats are going to side with? If it diminishes a hint of biblical Chrisianity or Judeo/Christian principles in any way, the Democrat liberals are for it.

The same reasons why liberals don't expose Islam in this country and even favored their calls to prayer in Michigan. It helps elevate another religion which they hope in the end will diminish the Christian underpinnings of our law and culture.

This pattern has been seen for many decades and is totally obivous.

10 posted on 11/12/2004 6:24:31 AM PST by Old Landmarks (No fear of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oso blanco; Calpernia

"SCORCHED EARTH POLICY"

BOOKMARKING


11 posted on 11/12/2004 6:25:10 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Old Landmarks; KylaStarr; Cindy; StillProud2BeFree; nw_arizona_granny; Revel; Velveeta; ...

A very interesting thread.

Ping


12 posted on 11/12/2004 6:27:30 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

That attack on Serbia made no sense at all. It was just to show mr. muslim how fair liberals are in this country. Liberals have no problem with the muslim governments, even Iraq, when they terrorize, rape and slaughter. Liberals are the biggest hypocites in existence.


13 posted on 11/12/2004 6:31:51 AM PST by Old Landmarks (No fear of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DTA

Well kinda. What about the Srebrenica massacre? The serbs really did invade that city, under UN protection, an kill the disarmed residents. What about the snipers?

I agree it's not one sided, but I don't think supporting Serbia and Milsovec was a sensible plan either.

It was a classic "CNN War" like all of Clintons. Fought to quiet the TV reports (Somolia).

And left out of this article is the role Soros played in the demonization of Serbia.


14 posted on 11/12/2004 6:38:58 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

And left out of this article is the role Soros played in the demonization of Serbia.

Do you have a link? Thanks.


15 posted on 11/12/2004 6:44:51 AM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thank you, Calpernia.

I'm quite convinced that the US via Clinton was on the wrong side of the war on this one.


16 posted on 11/12/2004 6:58:51 AM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Jack Black
Well kinda. What about the Srebrenica massacre? The serbs really did invade that city, under UN protection, an kill the disarmed residents. What about the snipers?

What happened in Bosnia was a civil war, and like all civil wars it was brutal almost beyond our imaginings, the problem is that there is a focus directed at the Serbs to the exclusion of the Croats and the Moslems.
18 posted on 11/12/2004 7:11:48 AM PST by tjwmason ("The English, the English, the English are best; I wouldn't give tuppence for all of the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Good post!


19 posted on 11/12/2004 7:28:36 AM PST by winodog (We need to water the liberty tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oso blanco; Calpernia

Bump

BOOKMARK


20 posted on 11/12/2004 7:31:09 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-359 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson