Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio GOP Pre-Challenges 35,000 Voters
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 10/22/04 | Erin Brezsnyak

Posted on 10/22/2004 6:20:08 PM PDT by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - The Ohio Republican Party officially filed challenges Friday to approximately 35,000 registrants in 65 counties where voter fraud is believed to have taken place.

The state's Republican Party is pre-challenging these registrants' right to vote in the 2004 presidential election because mail to the new registrants was returned as undeliverable by U.S. Postal Service authorities.

"Our goal in filing these pre-election challenges is to protect the integrity of Ohio's electoral process," said Bob Bennett, chairman of the Ohio Republican Party. "We want to ensure that voters are not disenfranchised by fraud in this election. This is an effort to clarify questionable registrations in advance so they don't become an issue on Election Day."

Earlier in the week, Bennett was joined by Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie at a news conference where he showed thousands of pieces of undeliverable mail to newly registered voters. Concern was raised when the rate of return was at an unprecedented higher rate than in the past.

At the previous news conference, Bennett cited that the normal rate of return on new registrations in less than 1 percent. However, this year the rate of return has ranged from 2 percent to 11 percent in Ohio counties.

Bennett also called on the Democratic Party to help in ensuring a fair and honest election this November, instead of making outrageous claims that the Republican Party is trying to suppress voters.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: crackforvotes; fraud; napalminthemorning; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: airborne

Sorry, couldn't see your graphic, "bandwidth exceeded".

However, if you're infering from my new favorite sign that I'm pro choice, think again.

Do you see who is advocating that particular vote? Satan!

Get it?


81 posted on 10/22/2004 9:24:49 PM PDT by GatorGirl (Donate to the SwiftVets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

A little late to be doins this 10 days out, but better now than after.

Hear that thundering sound? It's the DNC lawyers coming to Ohio....


82 posted on 10/22/2004 9:27:52 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
I have my view, and my view is my view. I can't tell you in 20 years or whenever, if someone made a persuasive argument, the world changes. ... So I don't predict the future. What I tell you is that my position is what it is." --John Kerry
??? He actually... said this? And people think he's... SMART? Presidential?!?!
83 posted on 10/22/2004 11:24:05 PM PDT by cgk (Teresa Heinz Kerry: ``The Democratic machine in this country is putrid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
We know this has been going on, a story the MSM is hiding.

The Establishment Media was ALL OVER the handful of fake signatures on Ralph Nader petitions. At least Nader got his signatures without bribing anyone with crack.

84 posted on 10/22/2004 11:26:08 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (How do you ask a goose to be the last goose to die for the Kerry campaign?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KB4W

In Arizona, you don't even need identification to vote. The very idea was attacked by our Dem governor as the worst possible assault on our civil liberties.


85 posted on 10/22/2004 11:28:08 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (How do you ask a goose to be the last goose to die for the Kerry campaign?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Disenfranchised to the Kerry lawyers means you only get to vote once.


86 posted on 10/22/2004 11:54:48 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Proverbs 10:30 The righteous shall never be removed: but the wicked shall not inhabit the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

35,000 voters, divided by 35 registrations per voter = 1,000 registrations per voter.


87 posted on 10/23/2004 2:38:11 AM PDT by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl

"pro-choice" is just a lie.
Baby's never choose to die.


88 posted on 10/23/2004 3:11:39 AM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Every fraudulent vote cancels one legitimate vote, and there is no more pernicious form of disenfranchisement than nullifying the legitimate vote of an American by means of a fradulent vote cast for the other party.


89 posted on 10/23/2004 3:19:33 AM PDT by IStillBelieve (Sox and W in '04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; mhking
At the previous news conference, Bennett cited that the normal rate of return on new registrations in less than 1 percent. However, this year the rate of return has ranged from 2 percent to 11 percent in Ohio counties.

Yowza!

90 posted on 10/23/2004 4:57:03 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

is it five years for each act?........


91 posted on 10/23/2004 5:00:23 AM PDT by thingumbob (Kerry/Edwards are sKerry/Leftwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MWS

Hows that saying go....the only way evil can triumph is when good men do nothing.....?


92 posted on 10/23/2004 5:10:02 AM PDT by thingumbob (Kerry/Edwards are sKerry/Leftwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob

Exactly. I didn't say we do nothing. I think the GOP in Ohio is taking the right course.

But recognizing the right course does not mean not foreseeing what enemy reaction will be. I am hoping our strategists are planning for that which will be the Dem's obvious response.


93 posted on 10/23/2004 5:12:37 AM PDT by MWS (Errare humanum est, in errore perservare stultum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

I'm afraid it may take a Constitutional amendment.


94 posted on 10/23/2004 5:14:44 AM PDT by Crawdad (I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
They really need to start locking people up for FELONY OFFENSE of 'Voting Fraud'. This stuff has been not only been going on for too long (Lyndon Johnson's first Senatorial win) but is getting worse (all the recent news stories).

Putting a few hundred to a thousand of these clowns away for 4 to 5 years will serve as a warning and cut down on this.

95 posted on 10/23/2004 5:20:12 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MWS
I live in Ohio and this has been upsetting me mum who also lives here..........I'm starting to think the Dem plan is to get her to drop dead before election day.

Blackwell is great and I've been giving her daily updates about the latest news regarding Ohio voter fraud, election polls and stats, etc.

She always feels better after we talk........she's so determined to get out and vote (early) that if she did drop dead before election day, I'm sure she'd rise from the grave to vote on Nov. 2nd.........she's a real character....LOL.

96 posted on 10/23/2004 5:25:53 AM PDT by thingumbob (Kerry/Edwards are sKerry/Leftwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Principled
. . . when a privilege so many died for is abused.

One wonders, since it is a privilege paid for in blood, why it has been so easy to pull off fraudulent voting. There ought to be as much effort in obtaining proper identification from voters as there is for getting a drivers license. In fact, the former responsibility carries more weight than the latter.

97 posted on 10/23/2004 5:28:10 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MWS
. . . the Democrats are going to accuse us of trying to suppress the vote.

It is the duty of every honorable citizen to suppress the fraudulent vote.

98 posted on 10/23/2004 5:34:42 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl
Do you see who is advocating that particular vote? Satan!

Get it?

Yeah, I get it. The picture was of Satan. We're on the same side of the issue.

99 posted on 10/23/2004 5:35:22 AM PDT by airborne (God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Heh-heh-heh.

BITE it, 'Rats. :)

100 posted on 10/23/2004 5:36:39 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson