Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orgies are the way to ease social tensions, claims US judge (Scalia?)
The Guardian ^ | Friday October 1, 2004

Posted on 09/30/2004 11:09:17 PM PDT by Texaggie79

He is the conservative bastion of the US supreme court, a favourite of President Bush, and a hunting partner of the vice-president. He has argued vociferously against abortion rights, and in favour of anti-sodomy laws.

But it turns out that there is another side to Justice Antonin Scalia: he thinks Americans ought to be having more orgies.

Challenged about his views on sexual morality, Justice Scalia surprised his audience at Harvard University, telling them: "I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged."

It seems unlikely that this is what President Bush meant when he promised to appoint more judges like Scalia to the court, should the opportunity arise. Crucially, Justice Scalia is one of the judges in favour of overturning Roe v Wade, the landmark judgment protecting abortion as a constitutional right.

One audience member also asked the judge "whether you have any gay friends, and, if not, whether you'd like to be my friend," the Harvard Crimson newspaper reported.

"I probably do have some gay friends, but I have never pressed the point," Justice Scalia responded. He offered no clue to the logic behind his claim that orgies eliminate social tensions.

Nobody asked him whether he was familiar with Rick Moody's novel The Ice Storm, turned into a movie by Ang Lee, which appeared to suggest the exact opposite.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; lyingmediascum; orgies; scalia; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2004 11:09:18 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

What the hell?


2 posted on 09/30/2004 11:11:35 PM PDT by Crazieman (Hanoi John Effin Kerry. War Criminal. Traitor. Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

What the hell is this???


3 posted on 09/30/2004 11:12:18 PM PDT by RockinRight (W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

This is obviously a sarcastic joke.


4 posted on 09/30/2004 11:13:34 PM PDT by Odyssey-x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

ok everyone remain calm. I think the US judicial system has just gone piano-plinking mad.


5 posted on 09/30/2004 11:13:53 PM PDT by modest proposal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Check out Drudge. Here is another link that kinda just breezes by the comment. Perhaps it was in jest? I dunno, but Drudge is pressing the issue.
6 posted on 09/30/2004 11:14:04 PM PDT by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Odyssey-x

I live on sarcasm and this doesn't strike me. It seems off the wall enough, but it just doesn't fit.


7 posted on 09/30/2004 11:15:06 PM PDT by Crazieman (Hanoi John Effin Kerry. War Criminal. Traitor. Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

ROTFLMAO!
Sounds like the old boy has a sense of humor!


8 posted on 09/30/2004 11:15:53 PM PDT by mugs99 (Restore the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Odyssey-x
here is an excerpt

But Scalia said his personal views on social issues have no bearing on his courtroom decisions.

“I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged,” Scalia said.

“But it is blindingly clear that judges have no greater capacity than the rest of us to decide what is moral.”

9 posted on 09/30/2004 11:16:18 PM PDT by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

The Guardian quotes the Harvard Crimson. I just checked the Harvard Crimson website. Nowhere is this article mentioned. The last article that came up with a search under 'Scalia' was in March. A search under 'Scalia, orgies' came up negative also.


10 posted on 09/30/2004 11:16:33 PM PDT by petrotsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petrotsky
It's right here
11 posted on 09/30/2004 11:17:32 PM PDT by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: petrotsky

"scalia orgies". Now that brings up the disturbing thought of scalia in an orgy.

*shudder*


12 posted on 09/30/2004 11:17:46 PM PDT by modest proposal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79; tpaine

rather strange.
but whatever floats your boat, between consenting adults... is the law here. I guess for scalia, that includes orgies and all.

As long as he sticks with the constitution, we got a winner. Government ain't church of late. And biblical law is NOT our law of the land...

I guess it all comes down to how you define 'orgy'


13 posted on 09/30/2004 11:17:51 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petrotsky
Crimson
14 posted on 09/30/2004 11:18:03 PM PDT by Crazieman (Hanoi John Effin Kerry. War Criminal. Traitor. Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

I want to see Scalia with O'Connor and Bader-Ginsberg. Wow. That would be hot.


15 posted on 09/30/2004 11:20:05 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

I watched one of these sessions at Harvard a couple years ago on C-SPAN, and it seemed like the students were WAY out in left field. Not (just) politically, but just out of touch with reality in general. Obviously very bright though. I can guess that there is some lead in that we are missing.

I'm having a hard time coming up with one though. Anywhere we can look at a complete transcript?

-paridel


16 posted on 09/30/2004 11:20:58 PM PDT by Paridel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paridel

Not much of a chance at a transcript. Scalia keeps those things tightly scripted. Would be interesting though.


17 posted on 09/30/2004 11:22:51 PM PDT by petrotsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

baw chicka bow bow


18 posted on 09/30/2004 11:23:04 PM PDT by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

Ginsberg's hot.


19 posted on 09/30/2004 11:23:33 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79

"But Scalia said his personal views on social issues have no bearing on his courtroom decisions."

Sounds like he was trying to make a point that despite what he may personally think, he stillhas to follow the constitution and not his personal wishes.

I'd like to see an actual transcript of the speech, though.


20 posted on 09/30/2004 11:25:48 PM PDT by flashbunny (John Kerry: The Boston Flailer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson