What the hell?
The context was this: Scalia was mocking some state court decision which voided a law banning group gay sex on the ground that the ban violated a right to privacy. Sclaia joked, How many people have to be involved in group gay sex for it no longer to be a matter of privacy? Later, in response to a question he joked, hey, I'm in favor of orgies for the purpose of reducing social tensions.
It sounds like a Hasty Pudding event. You know, they invite someone once a year to be their grand marshall at this Harvard social club and the guest is expected to be utterly outrageous.
What the hell bump