Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2004 5:05:47 AM PDT by beaureguard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: beaureguard

First rate report !


2 posted on 09/22/2004 5:07:31 AM PDT by genefromjersey (So much to flame;so little time !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

who cares what the UN thinks?... it's a badge of honor that W was ignored and hated there...means he's doing the right thing


3 posted on 09/22/2004 5:08:15 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (Bender : This is the worst kind of discrimination. The kind against me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

Who cares what the UN thinks? Bunch of phony politicians that think they actually have some power. I vote we lob a cruise missile into their general assembly. Killing terrorists you know. I mean what the hell, Clinton wasted one on an aspirin factory. At least this one would do some good.


4 posted on 09/22/2004 5:09:52 AM PDT by michaelbfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

Bush hits his fair share of home runs when he's in friendly territory...it's nice to see him jack one out of the park in an away game.


5 posted on 09/22/2004 5:10:50 AM PDT by GiveEmDubya (Keep fighting like we're 10 points down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

The UN always holds their applause until the end of a speech. Kofi and his crew were rude but Bush has supporters there as well. Lots of them don't understand english well enough to follow such a speech anyway.


6 posted on 09/22/2004 5:10:51 AM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
When Kerry spoke to the National Guard (fine American citizens, most of whom will vote) he got a very cool reception. But the media didn't make a big deal out of it -- actually media outlets tended to cut away from the speech because it was going so poorly. Had to cover for the boy as he was going down.

When Bush spoke to the UN (foreigners who cannot vote in our election, and who frequently wish failure upon us) he got a typical, restrained reaction in accordance with UN custom. And the media tries to spin this as a big problem.

Old Media. So dead.

7 posted on 09/22/2004 5:11:43 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I have two words for John Kerry: "YYYEEEEAAARRGGGHHHH!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

Kerry should be more concerned with the National Guard men and women who gave HIM a "cool reception" last week, before he worries about President Bush getting a "cool reception" from the UN.

The members of the National Guard are US VOTERS.

The members of the UN are not.


8 posted on 09/22/2004 5:11:46 AM PDT by Neets (Conservative women LOVE BURLEY MEN, not GIRLIE DEMS.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

Well, to be honest, if Bush was received with handshakes, well-wishes and applause by the United Nations, then I would be seriously concerned.


9 posted on 09/22/2004 5:12:44 AM PDT by tdadams ('Unfit for Command' is full of lies... it quotes John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

The UN is like a bunch of Democrats--can't take care of themselves but want to tell everybody else what to do.


10 posted on 09/22/2004 5:14:11 AM PDT by lonestar (Me, too!--Weinie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
Anyone familiar with General Assembly opening speeches would realize that applause is very rare.

If Bush had delivered the same speech to a joint session of Congress his applause would still be resounding in the ears of millions of Americans.

It was a lecture to the world.

It was a phenomenal speech!!

Bush has elevated the discussion.

Bush is the TR of this new century.

A century from now his name will be spoken in the same breath as Lincoln, FDR and Reagan.

11 posted on 09/22/2004 5:14:30 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (anybody but Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
They wanted the type of speech that John Kerry would deliver. They wanted to hear of appeasement.

Bingo! That is the UN way. Appease, appease, appease and maybe the bad guys will just get bored and stop doing bad things!!

Hey Kerry and your UN appeaseniks, There is no P-E-A-C-E in A-P-P-E-A-S-E-M-E-N-T.

12 posted on 09/22/2004 5:15:36 AM PDT by mc5cents ("We will have to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
Bush talked of all sorts of crazy stuff about liberty, democracy, human rights, freedom and dignity. Those are the kinds of things that the United Nations is supposed to stand for, but clearly does not. Never really has.

Spot on!

13 posted on 09/22/2004 5:15:54 AM PDT by shezza (Hi, my name is shezza and I'm a FReepaholic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
When you are pointing out how they are a useless organization, your not going to get a warm reception. And Bush is correct.

Sudan - UN-inaction is resulting in millions to die or be left homeless

Iran - They are thumbing their noses at the UN and are in violation of UN resolutions by restarting their nuclear enrichment program.

Pre-war Iraq - Forget about the WMD, they were shooting at our planes in the no fly zone an aggressive violation of UN resolutions.
15 posted on 09/22/2004 5:16:18 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
Just one idea to leave you with. Can you imagine what would happen if the United States announced that at some time certain it was going to withdraw from the United Nations and cease all further funding. At that time the United States would form a new international organization loosely modeled after the UN .. but with one huge difference. Only states who's leaders are popularly elected in open and free elections, and who place civilians in charge of the military, will be allowed to join.

I REALLY Like this idea. The fact that we are kept "on par" with third world despots at the UN is appalling to me.

17 posted on 09/22/2004 5:17:15 AM PDT by GunnyB (Once a Marine, Always a Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
"Just one idea to leave you with. Can you imagine what would happen if the United States announced that at some time certain it was going to withdraw from the United Nations and cease all further funding. At that time the United States would form a new international organization loosely modeled after the UN .. but with one huge difference. Only states who's leaders are popularly elected in open and free elections, and who place civilians in charge of the military, will be allowed to join."


Though stated by others, even here on Free Republic, this is an idea whose time has come.


Perhaps in GWB's second term?

18 posted on 09/22/2004 5:17:39 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
"... it was reported that Bush's speech was not interrupted once by applause, and that there was only polite applause at the finish. This is supposed to give you the idea that Bush's speech was in contrast with other foreign leaders who are apparently met with with multiple interruptions of raucous applause and a balloon drop at the end."

As was said, speeches given to that august body are not interrupted until the end and then only polite applause is given. The speech was well taken and for those who were watching Fox or reading on the Net, heard or read foreign leaders approve of the President's speech. The MSM of course did not report or show any of that. It was a wonderful speech for people who are willing to go the long road to rid the world of terrorists...sort of an "Appeasers Need Not Apply" speech and a thank you to those who are sincerely working to stop terrorism.

The MSM is on everyone’s radar now as being biased and untruthful reporting.

20 posted on 09/22/2004 5:22:53 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

Fantastic speech by our President. The cool reception proved its effectiveness.

If the Libs think a cool reception from the U.N. is going to resonate as a negative with American voters, they prove they remain out of step with the majority of this country.


22 posted on 09/22/2004 5:24:09 AM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

I would of have been concerned if he got a good reception.


23 posted on 09/22/2004 5:25:21 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
"Both the American Declaration of Independence and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaim the equal value and dignity of every human life. That dignity is honored by the rule of law, limits on the power of the state, respect for women, protection of private property, free speech, equal justice, and religious tolerance."

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an Orwellian socialist document that should never be mentioned in the same breath as the American Declaration of Independence.

Check out Article 25 of the so-called Declaration of Human Rights:

Article 25.

Of course, in fairness, the UDOHR also includes a few actual rights, too. But even in those cases, check out the akarming paragraph 3 of Article 29:

Article 29.


24 posted on 09/22/2004 5:29:16 AM PDT by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

That was MY President speaking to that bunch of dictators, terrorists and socialists. Among them were a few on the same page as the US but many are not. GWB should have gotten big headlines for such an important speech that should have been quoted for weeks if the MSM wasn't turned so far to the left. Good for Fox News Channel to show the speech and to comment appropriately. As ratings continue to grow, more Americans will get a more fair and balanced approach to the news.


25 posted on 09/22/2004 5:29:27 AM PDT by kevinm13 (4 More Years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson