Posted on 09/16/2004 7:41:01 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
Publication In Or After September
by Rev. Louis P. Sheldon Chairman, Traditional Values Coalition
Washington, DC – Homosexual activists have apparently decided to reveal the next phase of their agenda this fall in theaters all over the United States. Nicole Kidman’s film “Birth” and Kevin Bacon’s “The Woodsman,” both present sympathetic views of pedophilia. “Three of Hearts: A Postmodern Family,” by film producer Susan Kaplan tells the story of two homosexual males and a female who become a “family” and eventually produce a child. Her film was recently shown at the Toronto Film Festival.
We have long been warning that the next phase of the homosexual movement would include the normalization of adult/child sex and the promotion of polyamory—multiple sex partners as “family.” Apparently that time has arrived.
The whole debate over the legalization of same-sex marriage takes on new urgency as we are being taught by Susan Kaplan that marriage shouldn’t be limited to just two partners—but three, four, or more—in various combinations.
Once same-sex marriage breaks free of its quarantine in Massachusetts and is legalized elsewhere—it will be difficult to stop sexual anarchists from demanding the “right to marry” two or more individuals. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that the legal briefs are already written by homosexual legal firms or the ACLU, just waiting to be filed when the time is right.
And, of course, organizations such as the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) are now working closely with the Woodhull Freedom Foundation (WFF) to undermine “age of consent” laws in the 50 states, to promote the legalization of public sex by homosexuals in restrooms and parks, and to legalize prostitution. The NGLTF and WFF bragged about this new campaign in a press release issued on May 28, 2004. This new coalition apparently wants children to be free to engage in sex with whomever they wish—regardless of age.
This will be a dream come true for the North American Man-Boy Love Association—and it will become open season for molesters to assault children.
Kevin Bacon’s film, “The Woodsman” is produced by homosexual activist filmmaker Lee Daniels who told a reporter for “Film Festival Today” that he wanted to “put a benign face on pedophilia” in this film. A benign face on someone who molests children? Why would someone want to provide a sympathetic view of a man who robs children of their innocence and condemns them to years of guilt and shame?
And, why would Nicole Kidman want to portray a woman who thinks a 10-year-old boy is her reincarnated husband? The film shows Kidman and the boy sitting naked in a tub together during a dream sequence.
These three films are part of an overall homosexual-inspired trend that seeks to deconstruct traditional marriage and overturn the taboo against adult/child sex. Hollywood could take a powerful leadership role in condemning the destruction of marriage and helping promote a national outcry against child molesters. Instead, it has become an ally of child molesters and sexual anarchists who are intent on undermining the basic unit of civilization: the traditional family. Our children and the traditional family will suffer the consequences of this Hollywood alliance with sexual criminals and perverts.
Amen to that.
The last time the hubster and I spent money on a film was when we bought the DVD versions of "We Were Soldiers" and "The Passion".I haven't seen the inside of a movie theater since Mel's "The Patriot" came out.I don't feel I am missing anything.
Me thinks you have forgotten an old proverb: "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
Name one film in the "forever" past that had an adult man or woman engaging in love making with a member of the opposite or same sex at the ages of 12-16? NAMES THEM!!
Actually, it went even further toward decency than that. Two actors, acting as husband & wife couldn't even sleep in the same bed. They pushed two single beds together and covered both beds with a single cover, making it look like they were sleeping in the same bed. My how "showbiz" has fallen into the sewer of depravity.
By prevention, do you mean cencorship? That is not feasible in this country. Even if it's for a worthy reason, cencorship is never the answer.
The proper way to prevent films which promote destructive behavior is to make sure that they lose so much money that Hollywood won't even consider doing them again.
That would be "censorship". If they can't make it on their own, then the gov't should subsidize them by giving them gov't grants like they give to the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Education Association, Public Broadcasting System, and others. How dare you even think of not helping these failing hollywood producers. How dare you. (/sarcasm>
Lolita.
Taxi Driver.
Perhaps you have some sort of reading difficulty, but I don't see anything in here about anyone "engaging in love making".
Here's a project for Hollywood:
A modern retelling of 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' by Gibbon.
It would be set in present day United States, primarily in Hollywood and DC.
It would read pretty much the way we are seeing it unfold right now.
It ends with Harvey Weinstein slumped in a large chair, drunk and half dress, with naked, sleeping 9 year old boys all around him, their underwear soaked in red wine, with Los Angeles going up behind him in a mushroom cloud. A panicked TV news bimbo is talking about how a nuclear terrorist incident has finally happened, despite President Kerry's withdrawal from Iraq, and the unprecedent Western-Islamic UN Peace Forum talks having been scheduled.
Assume this is true. So what? Centuries of experience has shown that monogamy is by far the most usual and optimal relationship. While people are free to engage in other types of relationships, there is nothing requiring government or society to endorse these relationships.
Nor is monogamy (or marriage) merely religious, as some would like to claim. Look all over the world. Why do Chinese, for example, engage primarily in monogomous marriage? They have a completely different history and culture than the Judeo-Christian experience, yet the results are similar enough within the boundaries of one-man-one-woman monogomous marriage that it must be more than coincidence.
Indeed...
Mark Twain, Roughing It (Chapter 15): Bless you, sir, at a time when I [Brigham Young] had seventy-two wives in this house, I groaned under the pressure of keeping thousands of dollars tied up in seventy-two bedsteads when the money ought to have been out at interest; and I just sold out the whole stock, sir, at a sacrifice, and built a bedstead seven feet long and ninety-six feet wide. But it was a failure, sir. I could not sleep. It appeared to me that the whole seventy-two women snored at once. The roar was deafening. And then the danger of it! That was what I was looking at. They would all draw in their breath at once, and you could actually see the walls of the house suck in--and then they would all exhale their breath at once, and you could see the walls swell out, and strain, and hear the rafters crack, and the shingles grind together. My friend, take an old man's advice, and don't encumber yourself with a large family--mind, I tell you, don't do it. In a small family, and in a small family only, you will find that comfort and that peace of mind which are the best at last of the blessings this world is able to afford us, and for the lack of which no accumulation of wealth, and no acquisition of fame, power, and greatness can ever compensate us. Take my word for it, ten or eleven wives is all you need--never go over it.
I just read in the paper today how Spain wants to be a 'cultural bridge', and has recommended that the UN make some sort of cultural commission to avoid the clash of civilizations . . .
You can't make this stuff up fast enough.
I guess thes means they are asking to be stepped on.
He that knows not and knows not that he knows not is a fool. Shun him.
"Movies about older men and women having real or imagined relationships with younger members of the opposite sex have been around for ever."
Here's you somewhat hysterical response (you sounded a bit like Gollum with that "NAMES THEM! thing BTW):
"Name one film in the "forever" past that had an adult man or woman engaging in love making with a member of the opposite or same sex at the ages of 12-16? NAMES THEM!!"
"...my precious..."
I rattled off a couple of films, "Taxi Driver", "Lolita", then pointed out that the Kidman movie included a dream scene where Kidman's character imagined herself in a bathtub with a twelve year old boy, hardly "engaging in love making".
Then you started talking about camels in tents.
I do get it; you're nuts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.