Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Rather is an early casualty in the war over truth in reporting
etalkinghead, political web magazine ^ | September 13, 2004 | Michael Hussey

Posted on 09/13/2004 12:43:29 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

There is a war under way for truth in reporting and a defiant Dan Rather is about to become one of the first foot soldiers fighting for Big Media to go down. It is quickly becoming common knowledge that Dan Rather and CBS’s 60 Minutes rushed to judgment regarding the authenticity of Texas National Guard documents potentially damaging to President Bush’s reelection campaign. Rather has unapologetically defended the report, seemingly oblivious to the magnanimity of his error and the damage it is going to cause CBS. The fact that Americans are more and more concerned about the authenticity and implications of the 60 Minutes report than the content of the documents is evidence that accuracy in reporting is the big story of this election session.

Ten years ago, the 60 Minutes story most likely would have caused its political damage without challenge. Those with legitimate questions over the authenticity of the documents did not have the ability to reach a wide enough mass of people to matter. Information travels so quickly today that, thanks to Matt Drudge, millions of Americans were hours ahead of the major news networks on this story, all wondering loudly through their own outlets (blogs, websites, et al) why no one was reporting this breakthrough.

The battle lines of this very public battle are drawn and the number of casualties is striking and rapidly on the rise. On the offensive are citizens who desire truth in reporting, many of whom are only recently realizing that the media they grew up respecting may not be worthy of their trust. Entrenched and on the defensive are the Dan Rathers of the world – the media elite.

Books exploring bias in the media have repeatedly reached the tops of the charts over the past few years. Websites devoted to debunking misinformation and exposing bias are spouting up every day. The clear majority of Americans no longer trust Big Media to report the truth. Now that there are thousands upon thousands of alternative sources to read and interpret the news, Big Media’s days are numbered.

The fall from grace has been in the works for years, but is accelerating as more people come to understand the power of the Internet for news gathering and fact checking. The NY Times started crumbling under the weight of the Jayson Blair scandal and internal squabbles over the future direction of the grey lady have been embarrassingly public. USA Today has suffered material damage through the exploits of Steven Glass, while hints of deeper troubles within the nation’s most popular newspaper were exposed. The once revered Boston Globe has taken a beating for its similar penchant for publishing falsities. 60 Minutes will never again garner the audience it once enjoyed. Dan Rather is offending millions who will never believe him again. Certainly, lies and distortions have existed since people started reporting the news; but now there is a way to expose cheaters and counter-balance the damage.

In the information age, where news and data flows to tens, thousands, or potentially millions of discerning citizens at the click of a mouse, getting away with a lie is infinitely more challenging than it ever was. Cheats, liars, and media monopolies beware!


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bias; cbs; cbsnews; danrather; democratshill; forgery; fraud; journalism; killian; lies; msm; oldmedia; rather; reporting; truth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2004 12:43:30 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Cheats, liars, and media monopolies beware!

Too late, we've seen the man behind the curtain.


2 posted on 09/13/2004 12:50:21 AM PDT by loboinok (Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Matt Drudge? How about Freerepublic?


3 posted on 09/13/2004 12:50:40 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Thank you Rush Limbaugh-godfather of the New Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

4 posted on 09/13/2004 12:51:09 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

MAGNITUDE!!!!

not magnanimity.


5 posted on 09/13/2004 12:51:18 AM PDT by King Prout (civilization is a veneereal disease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
For years I walked the streets of Manhattan frustrated by the daily headlines in the New York Times screaming from the newspaper stands. I used to rail to myself like a drunken vagrant about how absolutely biased the headline wording and placement were. Little did I know, I wasn't alone in my suspicions

What an absolute feeling of relief to see the MSM getting it's asses handed to them.

6 posted on 09/13/2004 12:52:17 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
A loss experience involves the following five stages of emotional response: (1) denial, (2) bargaining, (3) anger, (4) despair, (5) acceptance

For those of you keeping track at home, this is the 5-stage process for Dan Rather and CBS, as they deal with their loss of credibility over memogate.

Right now, Dan's at stage 1. His willingness to compromise on some issues relating to the memos' authenticity shows he's moving to stage 2. I'm sure his move through stages 3 and 4 will not be shared with the public, with the exception of a possible on-air outburst against "the right-wing internet crazies" or something similar.

Finally, Dan will get to stage 5, and retire.

7 posted on 09/13/2004 12:56:59 AM PDT by nsc68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loboinok; Jeff Chandler; All

Los Angeles Times No Disputing It: Blogs Are Major Players.

MORE LINKS

8 posted on 09/13/2004 1:01:12 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"...oblivious to the magnanimity of his error..."

Wow! Norm Crosby's writing under a pseudonym! I'm really pleased somebody had the magnitude to give him a shot at this!

9 posted on 09/13/2004 1:02:16 AM PDT by Bonaparte (and guess who sighs his lullabies, to nights that never end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler; Cincinatus' Wife
How about Freerepublic?

Yes, it seems Michael Hussey leaves out a mention of what happened first.

Information travels so quickly today that, thanks to Matt Drudge, millions of Americans were hours ahead of the major news networks on this story . . . .

The Drudgereport just happens to be a major, informal gatekeeper of the news at the moment.

10 posted on 09/13/2004 1:04:32 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The effect of media bias is to disenfranchise me. The biased report is presented with the intention, conscious or unconscious, of changing votes. When it suceeds in changing even one vote, it disenfranchises me.

If I were black or Indian or a card carrying member of an otherwise sanctified group, the force of law would be applied relentlessly to redress my franchise. But conservatives are not a group which is recognized by the law. So the government will provide no relief. It is idle to expect the author of the disenfrancisement, the very media which published the bias and delights in my disenfranchisement, to act to save my vote.

Consider a fraudulent document, purporting to be of federal government provenance, which libels Jesse Jackson. One can only imagine the sturm and drang from the media and the energy of the Department of Justice. But, alas, our President is a white conservative Texan. I am surprised that there is not a bounty on him.


11 posted on 09/13/2004 1:06:03 AM PDT by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The stranglehold on the news by the liberal MSM is finally over. Kind of like removing a stone in your shoe that's been there 30 years - it feels great!


12 posted on 09/13/2004 1:10:59 AM PDT by NewMediaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
I'm really pleased somebody had the magnitude to give him a shot at this!

It was quite magnitudinous, to be sure.

13 posted on 09/13/2004 1:12:23 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("This house is sho' gone crazy!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaFan
The stranglehold on the news by the liberal MSM is finally over. Kind of like removing a stone in your shoe that's been there 30 years - it feels great!

Bloggers' hoax theory over Bush military service memos ...challenges mainstream media

14 posted on 09/13/2004 1:13:57 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Expert: Dan Rather Exaggerates Military Record
15 posted on 09/13/2004 1:16:25 AM PDT by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Thankyou for bringing that to my detention. Capitulation can prevent many an excommunication.


16 posted on 09/13/2004 1:26:54 AM PDT by Bonaparte (and guess who sighs his lullabies, to nights that never end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9
When C.redibility is B.asically S.uperficial
17 posted on 09/13/2004 1:29:06 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: zarf
"For years I walked the streets of Manhattan frustrated by the daily headlines in the New York Times screaming from the newspaper stands. I used to rail to myself like a drunken vagrant about how absolutely biased the headline wording and placement were. Little did I know, I wasn't alone in my suspicions"

I'll always remember the night years ago in NYC when I met Dan rather on the street, punched him in the nose, and asked, "What's the frequency, Kenneth?"

18 posted on 09/13/2004 1:42:19 AM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal

That was you? Remit me to give you a standing ovulation!


19 posted on 09/13/2004 1:49:03 AM PDT by Bonaparte (and guess who sighs his lullabies, to nights that never end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

http://img41.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img41&image=60minbusted.swf


20 posted on 09/13/2004 1:50:39 AM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson