Skip to comments.
[Explosion Update]N Korea says it blew up mountain(Really?)
BBC NEWS ^
| 09/13/04
| N/A
Posted on 09/12/2004 10:46:11 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
N Korea says it blew up mountain
North Korea has given an explanation for the huge blast last Thursday which prompted speculation that it was a part of a nuclear test.
The country's foreign minister, Paek Nam Sun, said the blast was the deliberate demolition of a mountain as part of a hydro-electric project.
His remarks were in response to a call for information by the visiting UK Foreign Office minister, Bill Rammell.
North Korea had said absolutely nothing about the incident until now.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doesnotmakesense; explanation; explosion; hydrodam; nkorea; northkorea; unlikely
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; Cultural Jihad; Thinkin' Gal; Khurkris
Kim Jong-il needs to lighten up on the friggin' hairspray.
Man, that stuff is killer.
41
posted on
09/13/2004 12:01:20 AM PDT
by
The Scourge of Yazid
(This tag-line paid for by "Friends of Paul Rodriguez.")
To: Southack
"This blast and the April blast on the train in North Korea both happened *very* close to the border with China." For this very reason I doubt that this was some sort of nuclear test.
Seems that red china might not take too kindly to anybody setting off nukes right by it's border.
42
posted on
09/13/2004 12:07:12 AM PDT
by
Positive
(There's nothing sadder than seeing a group of great ideas being murdered by a bunch of brutal facts!)
To: The Scourge of Yazid; dighton; Lijahsbubbe; aculeus
Kim Jong-il needs to lighten up on the friggin' hairspray. Man, that stuff is killer. Anybody seen ol' Kim lately?
You make an excellent point. This definitely could have been a case of exploding hair. Imagine the fallout. Nasty.
To: TigerLikesRooster
This is from an article in October 2002. This blast was in the Yanggang province. You be the judge whether it was a nuclear blast.
2. US Suspected Sites of Nuclear Program
The US has indicated the Academy of Sciences near Pyongyang as being one of three sites where it suspects DPRK carried out uranium-enrichment tests in connection with its admitted secret nuclear program, a diplomatic source said Monday. The other two sites US mentioned are the Hagap region located in Hwicheon, Jagang Province, and Yeongjeo-dong in Yanggang Province, about 20km from the PRC border, according to the source.
To: taxesareforever
Re #44
Uranium enrichment facilities at Yong-jo-dong(ri)? That is definitely interesting.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Sorry Lil Kim, that explanation is really
46
posted on
09/13/2004 12:25:38 AM PDT
by
Khurkris
(Proud Scottish/HillBilly - We perfected "The Art of the Grudge")
To: Bobby777
Wok was secret plot of Mossad aided by American Imperialists. Next question?"
"Wok accident?"
47
posted on
09/13/2004 12:25:48 AM PDT
by
dread78645
(Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
To: Southack
This blast and the April blast on the train in North Korea both happened *very* close to the border with China.
There's a HINT in there for us...
No doubt this is part of the puzzle.
48
posted on
09/13/2004 12:48:30 AM PDT
by
Truth666
To: taxesareforever
90% probabilities there was a pre-emptive attack on Taepodong Missile Base, possiblities that it was done by the North Korea resistance or an accident less than 10%. So the question is : who did it ? China, S.Korea/US/Japan or Russia ? On what are you basing the statement that it is a preemptive strike? How do you know they did not have an accident or something?
If it was a strike, All three of the Big Three would have to know about it and be in on it, Russia, US , and China.
When was the last time that such a type of accident happened ? Never before. If it wasn't a preemptive strike then there would be no need for the cover-up to go to these lengths. And yes, this is the ONE and ONLY case where theoretically Russia, US and China would agree.
49
posted on
09/13/2004 12:54:35 AM PDT
by
Truth666
To: TigerLikesRooster
They spend something like 25% of their GDP on the military. They don't have any domestic money for dams.
To: bayourod
Yeah. Either that or this could be the reason.....
cause it's there. Or, cause it WAS there.
51
posted on
09/13/2004 1:06:10 AM PDT
by
Capricam
To: TigerLikesRooster; ExSoldier; judicial meanz
52
posted on
09/13/2004 1:20:11 AM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Remembering "LET'S ROLL !!!")
To: grey_whiskers
They are hiding their nuke caca in a mountain?
53
posted on
09/13/2004 1:21:36 AM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Remembering "LET'S ROLL !!!")
To: dc-zoo
Don't forget the hydro-electric project were they were making slinky's!
54
posted on
09/13/2004 1:24:24 AM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Remembering "LET'S ROLL !!!")
To: Truth666
55
posted on
09/13/2004 1:26:32 AM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Remembering "LET'S ROLL !!!")
To: AF68
I think the reported numbers dead from the April explosion are too low by at least an order of magnitude. Officially, I think the NKs admit to only 150 or some such. If you've looked closely at the pics available from that event, there's no way it's that small a number.
56
posted on
09/13/2004 3:20:45 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
To: Quicksilver
Dan RATher
57
posted on
09/13/2004 3:27:11 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Tourette's syndrome is just a $&#$*!% excuse for poor *%$#** language skills.)
To: Thinkin' Gal
First there is a mountain, then there is no mountain. Then there is.
To: TigerLikesRooster; StriperSniper; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; ...
The country's foreign minister, Paek Nam Sun, said the blast was the deliberate demolition of a mountain as part of a hydro-electric project.Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight....
To: TigerLikesRooster
I'm not going to argue the NK explanation. Kerry jumped on the event (I suppose he assumed a nuke) to attribute a 'massive failure' in the President's policy.
Thread Now let's see how he explains his remarks.
60
posted on
09/13/2004 4:01:28 AM PDT
by
DaveMSmith
(Truth and liberty: The Battle Hymn of Free Republic)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson