Skip to comments.
Here We Go Some More
The American Spectator ^
| 09-13-2004
| Washington Prowler
Posted on 09/12/2004 9:28:38 PM PDT by nyconse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-323 next last
To: nyconse
"We do not have the originals, and our sources have indicated to us that we will not be getting the originals. How that is possible I don't know."Uh huh. I'll tell you how it is possible: Beebers get stuned, and all your beebers are belong to us.
To: alancarp
"we aren't going to be getting the originals"... also means that they know who gave them the original COPIES and it isn't as nebulous as indicated in he initial part of the statement. Also, the article seems to drift to the DNC. If O were a betting man, the COPIES came from the DNC, CBS and RATHER KNOW they were HOSED; they will not divulge their source BUT THEY WILL ATTACK THE SOURCE REAL HARD... at least the individual. GUARANTEED: They will not attack the DNC as they should as they are afraid of the DNC and have too much invested in (or too many investors in CBS) to turn on the Limousine Liberals.
Wish I were a fly on the wall or could just watch who goes in and out of CBS next week. At least as far as who the "runners" represent.
22
posted on
09/12/2004 9:48:45 PM PDT
by
Henchman
(Demand an inquiry by the media into Kerry's dealing with the VC in PARIS!)
To: Cboldt; Shermy
<< PERHAPS MOST TROUBLING to the CBS News staff looking into how its story went off the rails is the timing of the memos' appearance. "Some 60 Minutes staffers have been working on this story for more than three years off and on," says the CBS News producer. "There have been rumors about these memos and what was in them for at least that long. No one had been able to find anything. Not a single piece of paper.
But we know that a lot of people here interviewed a lot of people in Texas and elsewhere and asked very explicit questions about the existence of these memos. Then all of a sudden they show up? In one nice, neat package?" >>
CBoldt, this is very like what you have been saying on other threads.
To: alancarp
Dan went with the 'buzz cut' to boost ratings, all he has to do is grow a mustache and all this will blow over. Right?
Keep shooting yourself in the foot, Danny.
24
posted on
09/12/2004 9:49:23 PM PDT
by
batter
("Never let the enemy pick the battle site." - Gen. George S. Patton)
To: Truthsearcher
With the caveat and we must keep up the pressure.Absolutely. 24/7.
25
posted on
09/12/2004 9:49:45 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: Howlin
Kerry, the media, the Dems....they are so arrogant. This whole fiasco shows the contempt these people have for the American people...they think we are absolute idiots and that they can manipulate us-disgusting.
26
posted on
09/12/2004 9:49:47 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: Carling
I'm not focused on the legitimate part, I just think we're giving the left AHA! issues to seize on that are unnecessary. I'm trying to force THEM to focus on the real issues.
27
posted on
09/12/2004 9:50:54 PM PDT
by
Hank All-American
(Free Men, Free Minds, Free Markets baby!)
To: Diddle E. Squat
Harkin was the first one out of the gate with this story, demanding that Bush tell the truth! The first.
28
posted on
09/12/2004 9:51:17 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: nyconse; Howlin
<< Yeah, I don't believe for one minute there are any real handwritten notes.. What do you think? >>
Handwritten by whom?
I'd wager that somebody is writing them by hand right now!!!
To: Henchman
I'm starting to suspect the Democrats are running a COM-SYMP for President, but that's just me.
Look, there's Tom Harkin and Kerry with their Sandinista buddy Ortega.
What were they doing meeting with that communist SOB anyway?.
They sure look HAPPY to see him!.
30
posted on
09/12/2004 9:51:42 PM PDT
by
Rome2000
(The ENEMY for Kerry!!!!!)
To: alancarp
This is reminding me of the O.J. Simpson trial. What CBS may have been doing was "securing the evidence" in the way some believe the infamous "glove" was planted because the cops just "knew" he was guilty, CBS just faked the memos because they just "know" but can't prove it.
31
posted on
09/12/2004 9:51:48 PM PDT
by
TaxPayer2000
(The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,)
To: Sir Gawain; commish; Howlin; mabelkitty; Travis McGee
"* During which foray I also noted that this copy of Bush's suspension from flight status (page 10) appears to be the source of the forger's reference to AFM 35-13. But, as the Clown Posse discovered AFM 35-13 is the manual prescribing the consequences of not taking the physical. The requirement to take the physical is in AFM 160-1 (which uses the term "medical examination", not "physical examination", another error). The latter authority is what LtCol Killian would have referenced in any "In Accordance With" statement "ordering" Bush to take said physical. " The phrase "physical examination" instead of "Medical" was a dead giveaway. I posted that very thing here on FR on Buckhead and Howlin's 1st or 2nd thread on these forged docs back on Wednesday...still kudos to the blogger who found AFM 35-13 and 160-1 to confirm that and other mistakes in the forged documents.
The AWB Has Expired - Gun Owners Have Won Again!
32
posted on
09/12/2004 9:52:06 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
7. Three words: Kerning, Kerning, Kerning!
Kerning is tuned off by default in Word. Yes, the person who faked these memos in Word could have had it turned on, but its off by default.
33
posted on
09/12/2004 9:52:06 PM PDT
by
Talking_Mouse
(Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
To: nyconse
This is a great article...but it comes from a conservative source, not that there is anything wrong with that. My rhetorical question is where is the rest of the MSM media? Why are they silent on this? Are they willing to go down with CBS as accessories to the deceit or will they use the power of the 4th estate to investigate one of their own?...the silence, the silence is deafening.
34
posted on
09/12/2004 9:52:23 PM PDT
by
Drango
(What's the Font, Kenneth?)
To: alancarp
This is pretty much an admission that CBS knows the memos are phoney.
35
posted on
09/12/2004 9:52:48 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
To: nyconse
36
posted on
09/12/2004 9:53:02 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: Hank All-American
I called my local CBS and told them something had to be done...or I'm calling Dish and asking to have CBS blocked. I refuse to have a channel which attempts to smear a sitting President with lies coming into my home. The local station rep (nice lady) said we are looking into this and we have been deluged by calls.
37
posted on
09/12/2004 9:53:14 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: nyconse
MEANWHILE, OVER THE WEEKEND journalists from around the country were attempting to track down the original source of the documents. "We're having a hard time tracking how we got the documents," says the CBS News producer. They don't even know where they got the Bleeping Documents from???
HELLO!!!
Hey Dan .. Your Career is OVER!!
38
posted on
09/12/2004 9:54:13 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Why is the MSM calling the Vietnam Vets and POW's a suspected group??)
To: nyconse
"We're having a hard time tracking how we got the documents," says the CBS News producerI can imagine. And since originals do not exist, you won't be getting those either.
39
posted on
09/12/2004 9:54:24 PM PDT
by
Indie
(Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
To: nyconse; Howlin
> I don't believe for one minute there are any real
> handwritten notes.. What do you think?
That would only address the typography issues.
The content, grammar, abbrevations, dates, addresses,
etc. would still be entirely bogus.
And if CBS is saying that they don't think there are
any handwritten memos, that means they know that the
present documents are modern forgeries.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-323 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson