Skip to comments.
Per FoxNews: Pentagon questioning PO Box Number
FoxNews
| 10 SEP 2004
| me
Posted on 09/10/2004 11:09:40 AM PDT by aft_lizard
James Rosen just reported that the Pentagon questions the use of a PO Box on a memo, and that the PO Box may never have been used by that unit saying it seems highly unlikely that they would have PO Box containing sequential numbers. Standard military practice has always been to place the actual physical address on the letter head.
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bush; cbs; communistparty; danrather; forgerie; forgery; fraud; liar; napalminthemorning; nationalguard; pobox34567; rathergate; selectricgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 301-310 next last
To: aft_lizard
141
posted on
09/10/2004 11:54:19 AM PDT
by
John Lenin
("Si vis pacem, para bellum")
To: aft_lizard
142
posted on
09/10/2004 11:54:34 AM PDT
by
ambrose
(http://www.swiftvets.com/)
To: MeanWestTexan
My business street address uses the same zip code as my PO Box.
143
posted on
09/10/2004 11:54:57 AM PDT
by
rawhide
To: An.American.Expatriate
This is probably where the forger got the address. While you might run the PO Box as the address for a letter being sent to an individual, if Colonel Killian was mocking the letterhead he would have followed the standards. The forger was probably using what he thought was a good document to make it look better. Finding this address on an official document doesn't mean it isn't part of the evidence.
144
posted on
09/10/2004 11:55:21 AM PDT
by
sharkhawk
(I want to go to St. Somewhere)
To: Paradox
If the Hurricane hits as scheduled, then this entire story will soon "blow over".
145
posted on
09/10/2004 11:55:38 AM PDT
by
ambrose
(http://www.swiftvets.com/)
To: aft_lizard
I just did a search on the USPS zip code page and it came back that there is no p o box with the # 234567 in Houston. Of course, I guess there might have been back then?
Carolyn
P.S. In 1972 the zip codes in major cities were different than they are now -- they've had to add some.
146
posted on
09/10/2004 11:55:45 AM PDT
by
CDHart
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Not sure. But feedback was coined in 1971.
147
posted on
09/10/2004 11:56:00 AM PDT
by
Bogey78O
(John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
To: aft_lizard
hmmmm, that is something I always do when writing a draft, I use obvious bogus numbers like 12345 as a reminder that I need to get the correct number before publishing. Things a looking very bad for Dan, very very bad.
148
posted on
09/10/2004 11:56:27 AM PDT
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: aft_lizard
The more inconsistencies I read about the documents, the more it seems the providers of said documents
wanted them to be quickly exposed as fakes.
Which leads to all sorts of questions.
149
posted on
09/10/2004 11:56:47 AM PDT
by
GretchenM
(A country is a terrible thing to waste. Vote Republican.)
To: traviskicks
Bwahahaaa!!! I love it!
Frop!
150
posted on
09/10/2004 11:57:24 AM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(5 minutes of prayer for Terri, every day at 11 am EDT, until she's safe. http://www.terrisfight.org)
To: gracie1
I'm a mawg. Half man, half dog. I'm my own best friend! One of my all-time favorite lines.
151
posted on
09/10/2004 11:57:42 AM PDT
by
Doodle
To: aft_lizard
As I said, it only "confirms" that this adress may have been valid.
During my time in the military (80's) it was not common to use PO boxes, nor was it common to write to a service member at his private adress (as in the case of the "order" to appear for a flight physical).
To: oolatec
Here is what happened on that, I bet.
The drafters of the forged document put in that address as a "placeholder" because they were dying to get to the letter. Then they forgot to put in a "real" forged address....no one else on the drafting / forgery committee ever looked at it again.
The fault for this goes to the ding dong who typed it and decided to put that issue off until later.
OOPS!
To: NavySEAL F-16
The th would not have been smaller. You had to roll the paten (carriage) to superscript, but it did not make the letters smaller,just raised where you were able to slide the paten. Again, I am fairly convinced that these docs were forged. All I need to do is look at the source BUT the Executive was perfectly capable of typing a superscript if ordered with that key. No rolling of the platen would be necessary.
Regarding the line spacing, that is suspect. I doubt that the typewriter would have identical line spacing compared to the word processed version. Still, I think that other indicators of forgery are stronger then the typography..
To: rawhide
As stated, exceptions exists. In a big city, however, like Houston, however, I (and the postman I talked to) thought it would be unlikely.
To: Doodle
156
posted on
09/10/2004 12:00:30 PM PDT
by
Daus
To: Fawnn
It's not like the memo had dead giveaway info on it, like CC to Johnny Johnson in Johnson City, Texas or anything. ;)Having been in the military for 30+ years, one thing I should have noticed the address too. Most installations use the physical street address. My installation has both in unofficial headings, but ONLY the street address in official memos.
157
posted on
09/10/2004 12:00:43 PM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Charter member of the VRWC - and proud of it.)
To: traviskicks
Frop = Yopp. (but I think I like frop better.)
158
posted on
09/10/2004 12:01:04 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(5 minutes of prayer for Terri, every day at 11 am EDT, until she's safe. http://www.terrisfight.org)
To: Non-Sequitur
Ladies and Gentlemen, if all this holds up then there can be no doubt that the person who would use a font on a document dated 25 years before the font was created, or who would use numbers in sequence for a phony PO box has got to be the stupidest person ever placed on God's green Earth. Even dumber than my brother-in-law, and that's saying a lot. So, John Kerry did it himself?
159
posted on
09/10/2004 12:01:25 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Vote early, vote often)
To: aft_lizard
Well back then the 147th and 11th were interchangeable. Just like medals and ribbons.
160
posted on
09/10/2004 12:02:46 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
(John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 301-310 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson