Posted on 09/09/2004 8:14:01 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa
Edited on 09/09/2004 8:52:15 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
CBSNEWS LAUNCHES INTERNAL INVESTIGATION AFTER SUSPICIOUS BUSH DOCS AIRED
Nothig more yet...
**********More***
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU SEPT 09, 2004 22:45:32 ET XXXXX
CBSNEWS LAUNCHES INTERNAL INVESTIGATION AFTER SUSPICIOUS BUSH DOCS AIRED
**Exclusive**
CBS NEWS executives have launched an internal investigation into whether its premiere news program 60 MINUTES aired fabricated documents relating to Bush's National Guard service, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
"The reputation and integrity of the entire news division is at stake, if we are in error, it will be corrected," a top CBS source explained late Thursday.
The source, who asked not to be named, described CBSNEWS anchor and 60 MINUTES correspondent Dan Rather as being privately "shell-shocked" by the increasingly likelihood that the documents in question were fraudulent.
Rather, who anchored the segment presenting new information on the president's military service, will personally correct the record on-air, if need be, the source explained from New York.
MORE
30 days to go...
It is not a legitimate correction if the source is not identified.
CBS cannot claim the anonymity of sources to withhold the name of the source, since the source provided unethically FALSE information. Otherwise, they claim they will protect proven false sources. This will give the impression that false information is OK with them and perhaps part of their MO.
It's at least the same order of magnitude as the Watergate break-in (only no chance for a presidential pardon). The questions are, what did Kerry know and when did he know it and when can we expect his tearful resignation from the U.S. Senate? I want to see the perp walk! Demand a Senate investigation!
I would not write that stuff off yet.
Also, it is just one of many flaws.
Including the 18 August 1973 memo that mentions Stoudt.
According to an LA Times article in Feb.....Stoudt retired in 1972!!!!
Yeah its on. I'm watching the game from the Watertown NY station. That stationwill air nightline at 12:35AM. I do not know what your ABC channel will do. BTW it is one hell of a good game.
Rather is going to find a fall guy and within a couple of days, come out and apologize for the other guys mistake. Yet, he will still twist some of the information to make Bush look bad.
Dan....?
Dan....?
Dan.... are you in there Dan....?
Dan....?
Dan....?
Come out of the bathroom, Dan...
Dan....?
IF in error? LOL
Something strikes me during this story.
The media joined with the Dem party to take down a Republican President, destroy trust in our government, military, CIA and FBI.
They succeeded in making America question her honor.
We FF to 2004, they join forces again. Only this time the Dem party and media are going down in flames while America once again renews Her faith in those previously disparaged.
This could potentially rate the impact Watergate did, in destroying Old Media's credibility for a generation.
Clinton mole in the Pentagon. Count on it.
...and very series!
Remember boys & girls - fact checkers are only required for storied about democrats.
"Now is the time to hit CBS' sponsors with demands that Rather resign"
We can bitchslap CBS harder than when they tried to run the fraudulent Reagan hit piece!!!!! Let's do this!!!!!!
The th doesn't rise above the line like word
Rather biased? No, not Rather. Explicitly and totally biased, that's Rather. I recall well the attempted hatchet job Rather pulled on President George HW Bush in 1992. A two minute blast in the form of a taped video, then followed by accusatory questions. Even mild mannered GHWB came unglued at that one. Time for Rather to go and this should be the twenty feet of board timber that broke the camels back.
thanks :)
And you think no one listens to ya. You go girl!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.