Posted on 08/29/2004 5:12:51 PM PDT by Salvation
Front Page StoryWhen the big hand says Thirteen Moon Calendarby Judi McLeod, Canadafreepress.com August 27, 2004
The United Nations, which has a finger in every global pie, and ambitions to take over the World Internet, is inching its way towards calendar reform. Long on lofty words and windy clauses, the official UN description for calendar reform is, "Calendar Reform and the Future of Civilization" (CRFC). Ostensibly, the UN rejected considering calendar reform in 1995 as part of its 50th anniversary. Within four years, UN officials were passing calendar duty over to lifetime activist for peace, Dr. José Argüelles, an originator of Earth Day. Dr. Arguelles World Summit on Peace and Time was convened on June 22-27, 1999 at the UN-owned University for Peace, in Costa Rica. Why is the UN itching to change the method by which the world tells time? Its the Gregorian Calendar. Having replaced the Julian Calendar, the Gregorian was instituted by papal decree in the year AD 1582 and adopted by virtually all nations as the common world standard. Accepted by virtually all nations notwithstanding, the Gregorian Calendar is irksome to New Agers because the whole world marks time based on the Birth of Jesus Christ. And as far as the occultist UN is concerned, that will never do. So why not break and fix it? If the concept of throwing the Gregorian Calendar out to replace it with the World Thirteen Moon 28-day Calendar of Peace isnt ludicrous enough, calendar challengers say they are basing their reform on "common sense". "By rational discourse and common sense, it has been determined that the Gregorian Calendar does not represent a true or accurate standard of measure or belong to any systematic science of time, and hence, is worthy of reform," states a CRFC resolution from the World Summit on Peace and Time. The usual suspects were on hand when more than one hundred "followers of the World Thirteen Calendar Change Peace Movement" convened at the Costa Rican summit. Letters of acknowledgement were sent to the summit on behalf of UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan; Secretary-General of UNESCO, Federico Mayor Zaragoza; His Holiness, the Dalai Lama; and by Jonathan Granoff of the Lawyers Alliance for World Security. Dr. Rodrigo Carazo, former President of Costa Rica and founder of the University gave the opening address for Peace. In attendance with Dr. Carazo was Gerardo Bidowski, acting Rector and representative of the then newly appointed President of the University for Peace, Maurice Strong. Seven commissions were set up during a four-day period and participating was former UN assistant Secretary-General Robert Muller, now UP chancellor, who gave a guided tour of the archeology and history o f the site of the University of Peace which was concluded by a walk to his nearby residence. The Thirteen Moon "Natural Time" Calendar is touted as "a universal application of the mathematics and cosmology of the Mayan calendar as deciphered by Dr. Jose Arguelles. Ph.D., and presents a simple yet so profound opportunity to shift our everyday consciousness." Described on his Internet home page as "both a visionary and a prophet", Dr. Arguelles bestowed upon himself the pagan name of, "Valum Votan". In a New Age magazine interview, he said it was "not until after he experimented with LSD that he realized he was a visionary." The final goal is to change the calendar from its present "artificial" 12-month year to a more "natural" 13-month year that more closely parallels the lunar and biological cycles. The results and declarations from the World Summit on Peace and Time have been submitted to the General Assembly of the UN. Wild and weird as it may sound, the Thirteen Moon Natural Time Peace Calendar could replace the Gregorian Calendar, courtesy of future UN resolution. It is, after all, Canadian Maurice Strong and former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev who, under the auspices of the UN, are working on an agenda to replace the Ten Commandments with the Earth Charter. Canada Free Press founding editor Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years experience in the media. A former Toronto Sun and Kingston Whig Standard columnist, she has also appeared on Newsmax.com, the Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and World Net Daily. Judi can be reached at: cfp@canadafreepress.com. |
Just imagine how many more federal holidays we would have! Not to mention an extra guvmint check each year.
The speed of light is 2.9979x108 meters per second. We need to change either the meter or the second to make it come out to 3.000000x108 m/s. Nobody (much) would notice and it would stop irritating me.
Have you tried contacting the UN? ;)
Irony is lost on some people. Actually UTC and ZULU are exactly the same thing. Converting from UTC to ZULU is like converting from Hertz to Cycles per Second. The U. S. Naval Observatory denigrades the term GMT. It is imprecisely and ambiguously defined. So unless you're a news reader for the Beeb, you shouldn't use the term < affected snotty Oxbridge accent > Greenwich Mean Time. < /affected snotty Oxbridge accent >
What's the only fundamental physical constant defined by an artifact?
The candela would have been (sort of right) before it was defined in more definite units than its original (historical) definition...
Shall we discuss Mach's Principle and confuse everyone (including ourselves?)
I'd have an eleven month calendar, and get rid of February. Too cold. And too hard to spell.
Here's an idea.
Instead of dividing up the year into 13 "months", maybe we could divide it into 10 months.
We could name the months according to the type of weather each has.
For instance, July could become "Thermidor".
Baked Alaska?
==============================
Once my company put out a calendar that was filled with errors. Wrong number of days in some months. Weeks beginning on Monday. Etc. So I wrote a poem (which did not endear me to the company prez, who had personally OK'd the calendar:
Forty days hath Octember;
Napril, Skoon, and Precember.
All the rest have thirty-nine
Save February, which has 30 days--
Or so says "Yo-Yo Dyne".
--Boris
The candela is not a fundamental physical constant.
I assume you are not serious about redefining other physical constants to make the speed of light come out sort of even. There is at least one instance in which a physical unit was (more or less arbitrarily) redefined. In the United States the relationship between traditional units of length (inch, foot, yard, fathom, rod, furlong, mile, league...) had been established at 39.37 inches per meter. For some reason this was redefined to be 3.28 feet per meter, a difference of about 2 parts per million. Since a lot of existing surveys had already been done using the old standard, there arose two different kinds of measures: the "survey foot" and the "statute foot", the former retaining its old relationship to metric units.
Of course, you are perfectly free to us any definition of the speed of light that suits you. (Do you know what a "radar mile" is, btw? I think someone took a cue from you.)
Yes. You must become accustomed to my unique sense of humor.
BTW, 1/39.37 = 3.280833333...and my HP calc gives 3.28083989501. Hm.
But I still use (355./113.) for pi, so what do I know?
--Boris
My bad, 0.3048 meters == 1 statue foot.
From http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/appenB.html
B.6 U.S. survey foot and mile
The U. S. Metric Law of 1866 gave the relationship 1 m = 39.37 in (in is the unit symbol for the inch). From 1893 until 1959, the yard was defined as being exactly equal to (3600/3937) m, and thus the foot was defined as being exactly equal to (1200/3937) m.
In 1959 the definition of the yard was changed to bring the U.S. yard and the yard used in other countries into agreement. Since then the yard has been defined as exactly equal to 0.9144 m, and thus the foot has been defined as exactly equal to 0.3048 m. At the same time it was decided that any data expressed in feet derived from geodetic surveys within the United States would continue to bear the relationship as defined in 1893, namely, 1 ft = (1200/ 3937) m (ft is the unit symbol for the foot). The name of this foot is "U.S. survey foot," while the name of the new foot defined in 1959 is "international foot." The two are related to each other through the expression 1 international foot = 0.999 998 U.S. survey foot exactly.
You mean like this?
I happen to be ethnically Chinese, and I posted information about traditional Chinese calendar on a related thread on the Religion forum. Here's what I wrote:
BTTT of the page.
Discussion over here.
Very informative; thank you.
Why not just make the speed of light be how we define 1 unit of distance in 1 unit of time? Physics would be easier! :)
earth charter crap found here;
http://www.earthcharter.org/innerpg.cfm?id_menu=19
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.