Skip to comments.
A PRESIDENT KERRY MAY BE ABHORRENT... BUT IS IT EVEN CONSTITUTIONAL?
The U,S, Constitution ^
| 8.21.04
| Mia T
Posted on 08/21/2004 6:40:17 AM PDT by Mia T
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: TheBattman
"The US has sunk to a level that a lying traitor can have a real chance at being elected to the most powerful office in the world, and I am ashamed of the fact that American voters are stupid enough to possibly put him there."
I'm ashamed that you think they're dumb enough to elect him.
21
posted on
08/21/2004 7:16:47 AM PDT
by
Terpfen
(Worrying about President Kerry is like worrying about President Dukakis.)
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: dufekin
I think after Kerry LOOSES the election, we should all try to get both him and Kennedy OUT of the senate, PRONTO.
23
posted on
08/21/2004 7:18:30 AM PDT
by
Pippin
(RE-ELECT BUSH/CHENEY............PLEASE!)
To: TheBattman
If they do put that traitor in the WH then they are stupid.
24
posted on
08/21/2004 7:20:10 AM PDT
by
Pippin
(RE-ELECT BUSH/CHENEY............PLEASE!)
To: Terpfen
Remember - we are talking about the same electorate that elected Clinton TWICE....
And regardless of the actual outcome in November, the simple fact that Kerry is polling well (and in most cases, over Bush) would imply that Kerry has a large following of fellow traitors, liars, thieves, and Ketchup Queens. And yes, I know most polls are rather skewed.
The fact of the matter is - Kerry has an serious chance of winning the election - all it would take is Republicans not showing up. If the RATs get their voters out, we could be in trouble.
And I hope and pray that I am wrong. But I stand by my assertion - a large percentage of voters are either too lazy or too hard-headed (and stupid) to listen to the truth.
25
posted on
08/21/2004 7:32:26 AM PDT
by
TheBattman
(http://www.swiftvets.com/)
To: Mia T
...or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. This section of the Constitution is, at the least, grounds for an indictment of Congress' acceptance of Kerry as a Senator, and questions should be raised as to his fitness for the land's highest office.
Of all people, McCain, should see the obvious conflict between Kerry's Senatorship, his present bid for the presidency, and Amendment 14.
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
It would be interesting to see which elected officials vote to keep Kerry in office should the Congress become involved in Kerry's campaign - though I doubt that will happen.
On the off chance that Kerry does becomes president Conservatives will now have a challenge to his legitimacy for that office much as liberals now challenge Bush's legitimacy. Liberals will then be placed in the position of defending him, and his actions, over the years of his term in office - not a happy prospect for them or Kerry.
Kerry may become president - it's possible - but history will not be kind to him, or those around him, should that happen.
26
posted on
08/21/2004 7:38:32 AM PDT
by
Noachian
(Legislation without representation is tyranny)
To: TheBattman
Another thing about Kerry that scares me is his wanting to get that book "Unfit for Command" by John O'Neal off thier shelves. and his people asking the publishers not to publish it.
Sounds like censership to me.
27
posted on
08/21/2004 7:43:00 AM PDT
by
Pippin
(RE-ELECT BUSH/CHENEY............PLEASE!)
To: Mia T; MeekOneGOP
28
posted on
08/21/2004 7:54:27 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: Mia T
See post 8, It is directed to you.
29
posted on
08/21/2004 8:04:44 AM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: Mia T
Where is Fox News? Good on you Mia.
To: Mia T
BUMP for a concise and excellent thematic overview of the Flipper!
31
posted on
08/21/2004 8:15:24 AM PDT
by
eleni121
(Thank God for John Ashcroft: Four more years!)
To: Baynative; dufekin; Pippin; litany_of_lies; Xenalyte
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
- by Mia T, 5.15.04
-
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com
-
As long as you've got a rich man on your arm, you don't need a big bag. --Elizabeth Rickard The $100 billion Iraqi Oil for Food program was by far the largest relief operation in the history of the United Nations. By extension, it's rapidly becoming the U.N.'s largest-ever scandal.... Those included rewarding friends and allies world-wide with oil allocations on very favorable terms, as well as extracting large kickbacks from oil traders and suppliers of humanitarian goods.... There can be little doubt that U.N. mismanagement contributed greatly to the negative perception of the anti-Saddam containment policy. There is also little doubt that the reward and kickback scheme--as well the possibility of exposure--was a factor as some countries weighed whether to back U.S.-led regime change in Iraq. There is even reason to suspect that some of the Saddam friends and allies who benefited may have been members of the U.N. Secretariat. Oil for Scandal The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:01 a.m.
|
eave it to the French to make pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic all the rage.
They and their moneygrubbing, Oil-for-Food defrauding cohorts abroad, and their power-hungry would-be terrorist sympathizers here, are all sporting "THE LOOK."
(How many of those oh so trendy Kerry-clinton-Kennedy hate-America, blame-America-first sound bites will Al-Jazeera broadcast today?)
The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one, (as they have most things), exactly backward.
The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they seek to aid and abet.
|
32
posted on
08/21/2004 8:30:41 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Xenalyte
There was another FR thread in which freeper ApesforEvolution posted a VERY great joke!!
I'll try to come as close as I can to posting it here:
At a very large Catholic church in Boston,the Cardinal is approached by the Kerry campaign moments before the start of Sunday mass, with a "request".
The Kerry representative asks the Cardinal:"Sen.Kerry will be attending your service today, along with a substantial ammount of media people. If you could say from your pulpit durring your sermon that:"John Kerry is a Saint", we will
donate $100,000 to your church."
The Cardinal replies:"I will fulfill your request durring todays mass.", upon which the Kerry rep fulfills his "part"
of the "deal".
The large church is totally packed, with Kerry seated in the
front row pew, eagerly anticipating the Cardinals' "announcement", which will FINALLY put the Catholic "seal of approval" on his otherwise questionable
"faith".
The Cardinal starts his sermon.
"We have a special person in our house of worship today. I would like to welcome Mass Sen.John Kerry. In his 19 years in the Senate, he has voted for and supported "Roe vs. Wade", which ends the lifes of millions of unborn every year, which is completely against what the Church believes.
Sen Kerry also supports "partial birth abortion" which contradicts Church law.
Sen, Kerry has also has backed underage teenage birth control and abortion without parental consent, has STRONGLY come out in support of Gay marriage, which contradicts the teachings of the Church.
He has voted against our troops in Iraq, voted for almost
every tax increase that daily puts more of a strain on our hard working families.
After only 4 1/2 months of what was supposed to be at least a 12 month "tour of duty" in Viet Nam, Sen Kerry, along with Jane Fonda and a few others,has almost single handedly been
given the mantle of credit for creating the anti-war hatred and slandering of the US troops in VN, which resulted in the
treasonable act of supporting our enemy durring a time of war, and to this day, making every soldier who has ever put on a uniform for our great country, and especially those who served so faithfully in VN, feel like a criminal in their own country to this very day because of the lies he told in 1971 in front of a Senate committee, of the DAILY attrocities committed by our brave fighting service men and women.
......But compared to Sen. Ted Kennedy, John Kerry is a Saint !!"
33
posted on
08/21/2004 8:43:46 AM PDT
by
musicman
To: Pippin
"Then why is John Kerry even a senator?" 'Cuz he's from Taxachusetts where voters apparently have no standards whatsoever...MUD
34
posted on
08/21/2004 9:10:02 AM PDT
by
Mudboy Slim
(RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
To: litany_of_lies
"Why wouldn't an effort to expel him from the Senate once he's defeated for President be successful?" I'd love to see it...how do we initiate the process?!
FReegards...MUD
35
posted on
08/21/2004 9:11:57 AM PDT
by
Mudboy Slim
(RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
To: Mia T
I am amazed to say that this post raises a good point.
36
posted on
08/21/2004 9:13:04 AM PDT
by
The Wizard
(DemonRATS: enemies of America)
To: EdReform
37
posted on
08/21/2004 9:14:29 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: demkicker; Mia T
<< Thanks for calling attention to the 14th Amendment. This is the most important presidential election EVER! >>
That it is.
Until the next.
38
posted on
08/21/2004 9:41:12 AM PDT
by
Brian Allen
(I am, thank God, a hyphenated American -- An AMERICAN-American -- and A Dollar-a-Day FReeper!)
To: Pippin
Then why is John Kerry even a senator?Because the NVA and VC were never made "enemies of the United States" by a Constitutional process.
39
posted on
08/21/2004 9:44:15 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Hillary becomes the RAT candidate on October 9. You saw it here first.)
To: TheBattman
"Remember - we are talking about the same electorate that elected Clinton TWICE...."
No, we're not. The 2004 electorate is vastly different from the 1992 and 1996 electorate. For one, the Republicans in 2004 have fielded a candidate the public cares about--I maintain that the Democrats did not win in 1992 and 1996, but rather the Republican candidates lost. How else do you explain not just Republicans, but conservatives, taking over the House in 1994? In both 1992 and 1996, Clinton never got over 50% of the popular vote--a further sign of voter apathy towards these candidates. Even the liberal media ran stories in 1996 about how boring the race was. Further reaffirmation of the public's apathy towards Clinton: "My Life" and "Living History" sales never reached what they were projected to, and in fact are being discounted at huge rates, yet still aren't selling. Meanwhile, conservative books are tearing up the charts.
This election is Bush's to lose, and he is not losing. I don't care if the latest ABCBSNBCNNMSNBC poll says otherwise.
40
posted on
08/21/2004 10:29:12 AM PDT
by
Terpfen
(Worrying about President Kerry is like worrying about President Dukakis.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson