Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charley's Force Took Experts by Surprise (NOAA Covering It's Behind...)
AP ^ | 08/14/2004 | SnapperJK

Posted on 08/14/2004 7:06:04 PM PDT by snapperjk

Aug 14, 6:41 PM (ET)

By MARCIA DUNN

Hurricane Charley's 145-mph force took forecasters by surprise and showed just how shaky a science it still is to predict a storm's intensity - even with all the latest satellite and radar technology.

"Most major hurricanes become major by going through a rapid intensification. This is the Number 1 area to research. I think that there is the perception out there because of the satellite photos and aircraft data, people do have faith in the technology and sometimes that faith is too much," Max Mayfield, National Hurricane Center director, told reporters Saturday in Miami, 24 hours after Charley slammed into Florida's western coast.

"A lot of people think we can give them a near perfect forecast. We know we can't give them a near perfect forecast."

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: hurricanecharley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: Patton@Bastogne

Ahem.

I think I feel your pain (or maybe not).

Mother in law is so conservative, and has been all her life, that she made Goldwater look liberal.

If in fact her house is gone, I doubt she'll replace it. She will most likely keep herself and her disposable income where you want her to.


81 posted on 08/14/2004 9:19:14 PM PDT by Felis_irritable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

What do you mean they do not reflect a degree of uncertainty? Each alert is issued with a strike probability, is that what you're talking about?


82 posted on 08/14/2004 9:30:37 PM PDT by Howlin (Kerry being called a war hero is "a colloquialism.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Here is a NHC alert that very morning:

ZCZC MIATCPAT3 ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
BULLETIN
HURRICANE CHARLEY INTERMEDIATE ADVISORY NUMBER 16A
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
7 AM EDT FRI AUG 13 2004

...HURRICANE CHARLEY ON TRACK...WIND GUSTS TO 124 MPH IN CUBA...

A HURRICANE WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT FOR THE FLORIDA KEYS FROM THE
DRY TORTUGAS TO THE SEVEN MILE BRIDGE...AND FOR THE FLORIDA WEST
COAST FROM EAST CAPE SABLE NORTHWARD TO THE STEINHATCHEE RIVER. A
HURRICANE WARNING MEANS THAT HURRICANE CONDITIONS ARE EXPECTED
WITHIN THE WARNING AREA DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS. PREPARATIONS
SHOULD BE RUSHED TO COMPLETION.

Now, what area emcompasses East Cape Sable northward to Steinhatchee River?


83 posted on 08/14/2004 9:35:16 PM PDT by Howlin (Kerry being called a war hero is "a colloquialism.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

LOL Actually Earl is 2750 miles from Galveston. Make your preparations now :)


84 posted on 08/14/2004 10:05:03 PM PDT by Marak (Let me turn you on to Fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Marak

That's all I'm saying.


85 posted on 08/14/2004 10:07:04 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Have a nasty steak in you, don't you?


86 posted on 08/14/2004 10:10:01 PM PDT by Gabz (Ted Kennedy's driving has killed more people than second hand smoke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

I find it very odd that the probabilities chart on the NOAA web site had higer probability numbers for Naples, Ft. Myers, 12 hours before landfall, than they did for Tampa/St. Petersburg???!!!!.Now who is stupid?


87 posted on 08/14/2004 10:10:42 PM PDT by BOOTSTICK ( WEB SITE HAD HIGHER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Ping... ,
88 posted on 08/14/2004 10:14:29 PM PDT by snapperjk (If you are a terror to many, then beware of many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: snapperjk

Actually the National Hurricane Center did quite a good job with Charley. Anyone who was paying attention (and anyone who lives in Florida SHOULD pay attention) knew that Charley could hit anywhere between Marco Island and north of Tampa. When a hurricane is skirting the coast, as Charley was, where it actually makes landfall is impossible to predict, and the NHC never claimed to know where it was going. They posted the results of all of their computer models and liberally sprinkled it with warnings that they could not predict an impact point.

All of the county and municipal governments were kept informed and it was up to them to direct evacuation orders. It has been my experience to ignore the media when it comes to hurricanes and listen to the NHC. They give you the raw data and not hype.

Seems to me the only thing NHC might have missed was the prediction of cat 4 before landfall, although they did predict swift strenghtening to a cat 3 even before it hit Cuba.


89 posted on 08/14/2004 10:16:34 PM PDT by Marak (Let me turn you on to Fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK

And where did Charley hit?


90 posted on 08/14/2004 10:20:30 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: snapperjk

ROFL!!!!!!

I'm going to bed, I'll worry about flooding here in the morning - goodnight all.


91 posted on 08/14/2004 10:22:25 PM PDT by Gabz (Ted Kennedy's driving has killed more people than second hand smoke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Marak

"When a hurricane is skirting the coast, as Charley was, where it actually makes landfall is impossible to predict, and the NHC never claimed to know where it was going. They posted the results of all of their computer models and liberally sprinkled it with warnings that they could not predict an impact point."

Very true. NHC forecasters tweak the input to their computer models and obtain different solutions...sometimes VERY different solutions The trick is to decide which is the RIGHT solution. It's a tough call, and the stakes are high. I've dealt mostly with tornado and severe thunderstorm warnings, where the decision is made in seconds. High stress, but I love it.

I have enjoyed the thread. One of the best features of FR is to interact with others who CAN THINK! Well, the forecast database is updated for the midnight shift. Time to call it a day. Good night all...


92 posted on 08/14/2004 10:47:19 PM PDT by mesoman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: mesoman7
Thank you for your service to our country, both in the military and as a meteorologist. And welcome to FR!

When Neil Frank was head of the NHC (or whatever it was called at the time), he was an excellent PR person ... had a talent for explaining complicated things so that ordinary idiots could understand them.

I heard him explain that with all of the sophisticated equipment we have, we can only tell what a hurricane has done and is doing currently. We cannot know precisely what it will do. Even though the technology has advanced quite a bit since he said that, it's still true.

As someone who grew up in coastal NC, I have experienced and tracked a lot of hurricanes and have seen some amazingly fickle ones, including some that did loop-de-loops.

For the most part I think that meteorologists do a fantastic job ... and I also realize that you are the first to admit your mistakes (I guess it's hard not to ... LOL!) and figure out why the forecast was wrong -- not to place blame but to try to learn so you can do better next time.

(And, no, I don't kayak.)

93 posted on 08/14/2004 10:49:13 PM PDT by kayak (JFKerry "has fewer days at work this year than he has houses" - Tom DeLay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jamaly
I'm an emergency manager in NOLA so I never evacuate, but I'm kept pretty busy. I guess that is why the storms all kind of blend together in my memory.

Yes, the flood water may top out a third story building under the right conditions. You can probably survive if you can make it to the 4th floor of some building or to the top of the I-10 in places. Being several feet below sea level really puts us at a serious disadvantage for severe storms, but for light storms, the levees provide tremendous protection.

Of course if we do get the big one, then you may have to wait days to be rescued, especially if you are trapped inside of a building and we can't see you from a boat or a barge. Take an axe or chainsaw with you if you are forced into your attic in case you need to get up onto the roof. We tell people that there will be places with 18 to 24 feet of water if the levees are topped and the pumps fail and they can't believe it, but it could happen. If the eye of the storm came up the river and backed up the river flow with an 18 foot storm surge on top of that and then crossed over onto the lake and pushed much of that water back into the city, we are going to have a very bad day. If the pumps go under water, they could be out of service up to 6 months. So that means the city is underwater for that entire time.

If you choose to stay in the city with a cat 3 or higher storm you have to be very cognizant of rapidly rising water. Head for high ground and be sure to take along a life vest and enough food and water to wait several days to be rescued by boat or barge. Our levees are rated for Cat 2, but even so there may be localized flooding of around 5 feet in some areas due to heavy rain alone. By the way, a storm surge could easily travel from the gulf all the way to Baton Rouge, so it is extremely important for those outside the levee system to evacuate even cat 1 and 2 storms.
94 posted on 08/14/2004 11:58:58 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK

Strike probabilities are based in part on proximity, not just direction of the storm track. So of course all coastal points south of Tampa were going to have higher probabilities just because they were so close to the eye.


95 posted on 08/15/2004 12:05:26 AM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: snapperjk
Why don't you dash up to New England and get a deathbed confession from Charley for his chosen path?

That would make as much sense as your attitude for laser precision hurricane tracking.

96 posted on 08/15/2004 12:23:11 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I served in Viet Nam, and we have better hair"----John F'n Kerry campaign platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: lightman

lightman,Pa don't talk like you.


97 posted on 08/15/2004 12:26:47 AM PDT by fatima (My Granddaughter Karen is Home-WOOHOO We unite with all our troops and send our love-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Night smart mesoman7.can we hear from you tom.?


98 posted on 08/15/2004 12:31:30 AM PDT by fatima (My Granddaughter Karen is Home-WOOHOO We unite with all our troops and send our love-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What do you mean they do not reflect a degree of uncertainty? Each alert is issued with a strike probability, is that what you're talking about?

I'm saying the pretty little diagram that the projections were distilled into showed no possibility of a hit on the Fort Meyers area.

99 posted on 08/15/2004 3:18:25 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Ft Myers Strike Probabilities

Thurs 5:00PM 42%
Thurs 11:00PM 47%
Fri 8:00AM 50%
Fri 11:00AM 86%

In all cases, the strike probabilities were close, yet slightly greater than Tampa strike probabilities.

Source: NHC Strike Probabilities Archives

100 posted on 08/15/2004 5:53:02 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I served in Viet Nam, and we have better hair"----John F'n Kerry campaign platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson