Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Read GOP lips: No more IRS -- Hastert hints of Bush's secret plan to end income tax
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, August 3, 2004

Posted on 08/02/2004 11:16:09 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last
Tuesday, August 3, 2004
1 posted on 08/02/2004 11:16:11 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

This is nonsense. It will never happen, unfortunately.


2 posted on 08/02/2004 11:17:16 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

"Just keep re-electing us, and see if we remember schemes like this after November. Spin the wheel, place your bets. Ooooops, you lose again!"


3 posted on 08/02/2004 11:22:05 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Refuse to allow anyone who could only get a government job tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
An idea whose time has come!

"The current federal income tax system is broken. Patching up the existing code is pointless. It's time for a fresh approach, a fair approach. It's time for the FairTax," says the group's website. "From its humble beginnings, the income tax has grown like a cancer by taxing our hard work and discouraging savings and investment."

4 posted on 08/02/2004 11:24:23 PM PDT by Judith Anne (If Kerry doesn't quit licking his lips every 5 seconds, I'm going to throw up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Libs, eveywhere would still be able to send/give the gov't a donation from THEIR money. Can you think infintesimal results? Thought you could.


5 posted on 08/02/2004 11:33:57 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
An idea whose time has come!

Mega-Ditto that ;-)

6 posted on 08/02/2004 11:35:12 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Not getting too much traction bump. Has anyone got links to the other threads on this topic that wizzed by last night? I was reading about the terrorist attacks that didn't materialize.


7 posted on 08/03/2004 12:03:50 AM PDT by Dec31,1999 (www.protestwarrior.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Ah, if only...


8 posted on 08/03/2004 12:04:33 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dec31,1999; backhoe
Has anyone got links to the other threads on this topic that wizzed by last night?

Paging backhoe :-)

9 posted on 08/03/2004 12:04:54 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Has anyone got links to the other threads on this topic that wizzed by last night? Paging backhoe :-)

My friend, I missed last night's-- all I have is earlier stuff:

REPUBLICANS PLAN PUSH FOR ELIMINATION OF IRS

10 posted on 08/03/2004 3:51:11 AM PDT by backhoe (Kerry--- "The Frenchurian Candidate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

No other instrument is more powerful for social engineering than the income tax. The libs would consider such a move armageddon for them and would move heaven and earth to stop such a move.


11 posted on 08/03/2004 3:54:50 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I really like the idea of 15% flat tax across the board.

I would love to see someone point out why that might be a bad idea or not fair?

12 posted on 08/03/2004 4:25:26 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Do you just think I fell off a turnip truck?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

An idea whose time has come. I think not.
It puts the entire burden of the tax on the poor, and middle class.
The rich will not spend their millions, thus only a small portion will be taxed.
The poor will be taxed on their entire income.
The middle class will be taxed on a good portion of their income.


13 posted on 08/03/2004 4:28:34 AM PDT by chainsaw (VOTE AMERICAN - VOTE REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Taxman; Principled; Bigun; EternalVigilance; kevkrom; n-tres-ted; Poohbah; CliffC; ...
A Taxreform bump for you all.

If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

John Linder in the House & Saxby Chambliss Senate, offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and payroll taxes outright, and provide a IRS free replacement in the form of a retail sales tax:

H.R.25, S.1493
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer for additional information: http://www.fairtax.org & http://www.salestax.org


14 posted on 08/03/2004 4:49:52 AM PDT by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
It puts the entire burden of the tax on the poor, and middle class.

People would be intimidated by a 23% tax at the cash register especially the majority that live hand-to-mouth.

An underground economy would be inevitable.


BUMP

15 posted on 08/03/2004 4:55:13 AM PDT by tm22721 (In fac they)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

I think you are very mistaken because at this point the government has no choice but to end the incometax because of all the class action lawsuits being filed in federal courts against the irs and doj.


16 posted on 08/03/2004 4:56:12 AM PDT by taxtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
There are valid reasons for changing from the Income Tax. Let's assume that the economy goes into a serious recession or depression. A crisis develops in income to tax. With our huge debt and deficit, money has to be generated to pay for it. Voila!, we can collect taxes on consumption or sales. Everybody has to buy to survive. We can squeeze the last drop out of the public sector and prolong the inevitable a while longer.

Hastert's remarks are nothing but an indication that the lemmings in Washington are starting to realize belatedly that they have spent our country into oblivion and additional taxation has to be imposed. Forget about your own preference and delve deeper into the problem. Whenever a politician starts to talk tax reform, he means more taxes. Anyone could have predicted that with the huge spending increases, and deficit and debt problems that caused, that more taxes would be needed. This is the tax increase that you were expecting!

17 posted on 08/03/2004 5:09:52 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tm22721; chainsaw; ancient_geezer; Bigun; Principled; EternalVigilance

Read the legislation (H.R. 25 and S. 1493) and start thinking outside the box.

Presumably, you are both posting on the FReeRepublic Forum because FReedom is important to you. By passing the 16th Amendment to the US Constitution and legislating a progressive income tax and the necessary government enforcement arm (the IRS), the US government (by design!) turned every American into a government slave.

I, for one, am damn sick and tired of being a government slave!

The National Retail Sales Tax will end American citizen slavery. If FReeing the black slaves was worth a Civil War in 1865, FReeing the American slaves is damn sure worth fighting for in 2005!


18 posted on 08/03/2004 5:13:37 AM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

"The rich will not spend their millions, thus only a small portion will be taxed."

We're not entitled to tax "their millions," any more than we're entitled to tax your thousands or my seventeen cents.

"The poor will be taxed on their entire income.
The middle class will be taxed on a good portion of their income."

And the rich will take "their millions" and either spend like Mike Tyson or use it to create jobs to lift people from poverty to the middle class--or the upper.

Even if they put it into stocks, bonds, or savings accounts, it's still working for the common good. That's the capital that an entrepreneur borrows to start a company--like Microsoft.

We all benefit a lot more from that than we do from the state snatching it and wasting 99 cents for every dollar that arguably benefits a citizen.


19 posted on 08/03/2004 5:16:11 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

"I really like the idea of 15% flat tax across the board.
I would love to see someone point out why that might be a bad idea or not fair?"

For one thing, if the past 90 years of experience with an income tax has taught anything, it is that flat INCOME taxes don't stay flat. What we have now is a flat tax 90 years removed from inception. As recently as 1986, we had an "almost flat" tax. The IRC today is far worse than the one that was simplified in 1986. The inescapable conclusion, after 90 years of attempting to define what this concept called "taxable income" is, is that it is impossible to do in a stable and economically positive way, at least within the context of our political system.

Another problem is the way that tax costs "cascade" in our production chain, driving up prices to the next level. This makes it difficult for our products to compete with those that are made outside the country and is a major factor in our trade deficit, which is currently approaching $1/2 trillion/year. Not only are US produced products less competitive than they should be in foreign markets, but even here in our own, the largest consumer market in the world. This is insane! Why in the world would we want to have a tax system which puts our producers at a disadvantage in an increasingly global economy. We need a tax system for the 21st century, not the antiquated mess we have now.

The flat tax, BTW, retains both the corporate income and the payroll taxes and therefore does nothing about the second problem discussed above.


20 posted on 08/03/2004 5:19:01 AM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson