Posted on 07/30/2004 11:39:13 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
Boston, Mass. Some of John Kerry's fellow Swift Boat veterans the ones who were not on stage with him at the Democratic National Convention Thursday night are questioning the account of Kerry's Vietnam service as presented in a nine-minute biographical video played at the convention.
In particular, the film portrayed an incident in which Kerry, in command of a Swift Boat, rescued Army Green Beret Jim Rassman during a fight on a river in South Vietnam. The film graphically illustrated the incident, in which a group of Swift Boats, including Kerry's, came under attack on March 13, 1969. The film recounted the often-told story of how a wounded Kerry pulled Rassman out of the water while under enemy fire.
The veterans raise two objections to the story. First, they question Kerry's version of events. Second, they question the convention video's portrayal of Kerry's version of events.
First, the video. The film included what appeared to be pictures of the incident itself. But one of Kerry's fellow officers who was involved in the action that day says there is, to his knowledge, no film of what went on. "I can vouch for the fact that there was probably no way that that incident was filmed that day, in the chaos of that moment," says Larry Thurlow, who was, like Kerry, a Navy lieutenant in command of a Swift Boat.
There is some confusion about what the film actually shows. In 1996, the Boston Globe reported that Kerry bought an 8-mm movie camera during his time in Vietnam and used it to film reenactments of some of the action in which he was involved. The Globe reporter recounted how Kerry showed the reporter a video made from that old film during an interview in Kerry's Boston home. "Kerry jumps repeatedly from the couch to adjust the Sony large screen TV in his home entertainment center," the Globe reported, "making sure the picture is clear, the color correct. He fast forwards, rewinds and freezeframes the footage. His running commentary vivid, sometimes touching, sometimes self-serving never misses a beat."
The New York Times later reported that Kerry had not reenacted any action. And James Moll, the Hollywood director who made the Kerry convention film, told The New York Observer that he did not see any "reenacted" scenes of actual battle. But Moll's comments did not answer the question of what was shown in the convention video. "When Jim Rassman is talking about how John Kerry saved his life, I'm using some of that footage," Moll told the paper. "It shows the swift boat and various shots of the swift boat, and some firing like you see in the water. Bullets in the water."
But the Observer also reported that "the bullets in the water were not from the actual event," and that Moll said the footage was "illustrative." Whatever the case, the campaign video featured footage of Swift Boats in action, and of apparently hostile fire. In the end, it is not clear whether the events portrayed were real or a reenactment.
Another of Kerry's fellow veterans, Steven Gardner, says that Kerry did indeed make movies of himself, and asked his crew members to take pictures as well, but, wisely, always at times when the crew was not in danger of making contact with the enemy. "One of the guys would be taking pictures of him, but never in a fire zone," Gardner says. "Anytime he discharged a weapon or anything like that, it was strictly play action." (Gardner is the only enlisted man from Kerry's crew not to join the so-called "Band of Brothers" supporting Kerry. He says he never got along with his old skipper.)
"If I was making a movie of my tour of duty and wanted to show people when I got home, I'd probably do the same thing," says Larry Thurlow. "If you wanted to enhance the fact that you were in Vietnam and saw some action, you'd probably want to dramatize it a little bit. But he couldn't have taken pictures that day, because he had to be in control of his boat."
As for the first, more fundamental objection to the convention video, Thurlow says that Kerry's version of the events of March 13, 1969, is simply wrong. "His story is a total fabrication," Thurlow says. One of the Swift Boats did hit a mine that day, Thurlow says, but much of the rest of Kerry's story is inaccurate. "This thing about being under intense enemy fire is a falsehood...There was no fire off either bank [of the river]. This thing about getting Jim out of the river under a hail of bullets with these serious injuries is totally fabricated."
"We fired our weapons onto the bank to suppress any chance that there might be snipers that might try to pick off guys in the chaos," Thurlow says. "But I don't remember any fire from the banks." Thurlow also says he saw Kerry briefly toward the end of the day, and "he wasn't bleeding, and he wasn't hurt."
Thurlow's recollection of events, along with those of other veterans who were there, will be part of an upcoming book by John O'Neill, a leader of Swift Boat Veterans For Truth, a group of Kerry's former colleagues, mostly his fellow Navy officers, who oppose Kerry's presidential candidacy
"It was my thought that they'd probably have me do something clerical here in Oregon. About an hour after calling them, I got a call from some of John's campaign staff, and they asked me what I was doing for the next few days, and the next thing I knew, I was in Iowa." A tearful reunion followed at a rally in Des Moines .
I guess I thought Kerry, having received a Bronze Star for his "great personal courage", and Rassman, the Green Beret he saved from enemy fire, had been in touch before 2004 Jan/Feb.
"The party that made national politics safe for Vietnam draft avoiders in 1992 now considers Vietnam service arguably the foremost qualification for the presidency." -Rich Lowry, July 30, 2004, All Talk, NRO
I was surprised how many veterans came to stand on the stage last night. I had the impression that most of the men he served with had no respect for him.
My brother went to school and was roommate with one of the Navy officers who had swift boats. So one of my questions is, how did Kerry get a commission? Who pulled the strings? I don't think he did NROTC and we know he didn't go to Annapolis like my brother did.
Any specific questions regarding the swift boat captains who are opposed to Kerry can be sent to me and I'll ask Dennis.
bump
Lots of college graduates become officers without OTC. They simply attend OCS after enrolling.
What could they have possibly have known about him at the time. While in the military short times seem like forever, four months is still four months. While I knew the guy's I served with, I have no idea what they have done or what they have become since then, even though I've kept in touch with a few.
Are these known as "butter bars?"
Are you a war hero or a war criminal, Mr. Kerry? Didn't you throw your medals away?
Given that many of the men who testified in "Winter Soldier" turned out to be complete frauds who had never even been in the military, I would not be at all surprised to learn that half the men on that stage were out-of-work actors hired to play Vietnam combat vets.
I hope the "Swifties" can get on TV some way SOON. The lamestream media won't do ANYTHING to help them.
I actually was on Submarines during that time so I don't know the T/O rate, but I went to 'A' school with several PBR crewmen (all with a chest full of decorations). I believe there was a difference between PBR duty (river) and PCF duty (coastal duty where JFK the latter served). I believe there was a high casualty rate on PBR's so T/O would have been high. But four months is still four months when a normal tour of duty was 12 months.
I wouldn't think that there was more than 6 to 8 crewmen on a craft of that size. But I could be wrong.
"Everything that comes our of Kerry's mouth is a lie."
Not everything, just the words. What did you expect from a liberal?
I remember somewhere reading that the Kerry boat was down river about 5000 yds from the place where the action took place when Kerry pulled the guy from the river.
If that's the fact, that's almost three miles away from hostile fire. Anyone have any accurate data on the record of his citation
I don't know of any conservative who claims that no atrocities were ever committed in Vietnam. That kind of blanket statement is simply ridiculous.
Admittedly the everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie was also a ridiculous toungue-in-cheek exaggeration of what is the dominant conservative position that Kerry is willing to lie whenever he suits him.
According to Mr. Kerry there were atrocities at all levels of command. He also has testified flatly that he personally had committed some of them.
So if you believe that Kerry is telling the truth, do you also believe that Kerry is a war criminal?
You seem long on hate, but a little short on reason. Are you also short on the courage to have your arguments critically examined, or are you going to run back to the other haters now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.