Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archive Employees Suspicious of Berger - They Were Watching Him
Drudge Report ^ | 7-21-04 | Drudge Report

Posted on 07/21/2004 7:59:22 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Archives Employees Suspicious of Berger... devised a coding system and marked the documents they knew Berger was interested in canvassing, and watched him carefully... employees determined that that draft and all four or five other versions of the millennium memo had disappeared from the files after Berger viewed them, WASH POST set to report, say sources... Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 911; bergerjail; jfk; johnkerry; kerry; kerryedwards; knowingly; maliously; nara; nationalarchives; nationalsecurity; oopsifilledmypants; sandyberger; sandyburglar; sockgate; socks; soxgate; stuffedpants; terrorism; theinadvertantthief; trousergate; willfully
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 461-466 next last
To: Howlin

WOW!!!!!!!!!!! Solomon, at the crux of Both issues......



HE needs to be fired, or start doing some real reporting, instead fo acting like Lanny Davis' f*ng press agent.

(Wouldn't it be nice, if Comey wound up naming him in both cases.....)


341 posted on 07/22/2004 4:59:19 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
"What really blows my mind in all this the the "kerry" connection

Since Bergers mouth piece made the statement that he went to the Archives on behalf of the Clinton Administration, it leaves no doubt in my mind that he was throwing up a smoke screen to divert attention. There is no Clinton Administration. He was working for Kerry.

342 posted on 07/22/2004 5:01:04 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT; Howlin
To Clinton, and that might be a story. According to the reporter on FOX NEWS Special Report, the person he spoke to inside the campaign said, the reporters exact quote here --->) They were Highly pissed....

This looks like a Hillary!ous Torpedo into the side of the Kerry camp.

See the Washington Times about all the Clintonoids inside the campagin, and you have to know that they know exactly how this was leaked, now the campaign will be in disarray, behind the scenes, not knowing who to trust.....

343 posted on 07/22/2004 5:04:13 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Flint

No. He was working for Clinton. Screwing Kerry.


344 posted on 07/22/2004 5:06:19 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter
"He told Tom Brokaw, "I had no clue."

That is a typical Clintonspeak. No he didn't have "clues", he had all the facts and the documents, didn't need "clues".

345 posted on 07/22/2004 5:08:28 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

There were several versions of the same memo--how were they different? Why would Berger want duplicate copies?


346 posted on 07/22/2004 5:10:34 AM PDT by Mamzelle (for a post-neo conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
There were several versions of the same memo--how were they different? Why would Berger want duplicate copies?

It's ALWAYS in the 'footnotes'....!!!

IMO

bttt

347 posted on 07/22/2004 5:20:04 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
"...the archivists first notified Bruce Lindsey of all people." This has to worry the Democrats. Why? Because, if the documents were specially marked and he was being surveilled by Archive staff, one gets the impression that other law enforcement agencies were involved. If that's the case, the call to Lindsey makes sense in the context of a sting operation.

In other words, they called him to see who he would talk to and what he would say. That's got to worry the traitors on the Left.

Excellent points, and according to an article posted on this thread,Berger's mistake a kick in the pants

there was indeed a sting set up at the request of archive staff, once they realized what Bergler was up to.

348 posted on 07/22/2004 6:39:18 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Principled

>>time to discuss the "millenium memo".

I'll bet you the juiciest documents stolen were about
something else completely, like letting Bin Laden get away.

(smokescreen alert)


349 posted on 07/22/2004 6:44:02 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (FreedomLoving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Bring in these guys to "question" Sandy --


350 posted on 07/22/2004 7:06:34 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rhetorical pi2
I don't think we can depend on the Republican leaders in Congress to ask for a Special Prosecutor or a "Commission" to investigate any further.

Agreed. My biggest fear is that Rove decides holding Berger to the rule of law is coming over to the Soccer Moms as too harsh.

351 posted on 07/22/2004 7:10:21 AM PDT by LTCJ (Gridlock '05 - the Lesser of Three Evils.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Southack
.And listen for the THUD sound of some opposition bigwigs getting taken down.

Hopefully followed with the CLANG sound of a prison cell door shutting behind them!

352 posted on 07/22/2004 7:13:32 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: devolve

353 posted on 07/22/2004 7:16:42 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: POA2

Could you supply me with Aaron Brown's email?

I wrote him an email of complait once on his coverage of corporate scandals. He had interviewed Terry McAuliffe and never brought up Global Crossing.

Aaron Brown called him "that rascal" McAuliffe but said that his actions were not newsworthy.

I notice that this story isn't even on the CNN website.


354 posted on 07/22/2004 7:17:57 AM PDT by Republican Red (Is that a classified document in your pants Sandy or are you just glad to see me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Anybody who has not worked with TOP SECRET and above documents needs to be made aware how there is NO WAY that Berger could "inadvertently" walk out with several copies of a 15-30 page document at least twice, and how there is NO WAY that he could "apparently" destroy some of those copies.

The best description I've seen so far is tang-soo's, and he posted it several times. If you haven't read it, please take the time to do so here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1176181/posts?page=78#78


355 posted on 07/22/2004 7:31:08 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: AHerald; Rokke; CatoRenasci; ironman
Soliciting the opinion of those familiar with the handling of classified documents:

My interpretation of the stories of the "special markings" added by the Archives custodians after they became suspicious of Berger was they thought he might be altering hand-written (or other easily changeable) entries. In other words, since all classified documents are numbered and logged anyway, the only reason to "specifically mark" a classified document beyond its original state would be if you suspected it was being changed.

Can anyone think of anther plausible explanation in light of your experience?

356 posted on 07/22/2004 7:33:35 AM PDT by LTCJ (Gridlock '05 - the Lesser of Three Evils.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand; AFPhys

Meant to ping you on #356. Thoughts?


357 posted on 07/22/2004 7:37:31 AM PDT by LTCJ (Gridlock '05 - the Lesser of Three Evils.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

hmmmm that is an interestig take on this- Maybe Berger was trying to prevent his becoming another Arkancide


358 posted on 07/22/2004 7:40:48 AM PDT by Mr. K (ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,this is like liberal logic,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Your thoughts, please, on #356.
359 posted on 07/22/2004 7:43:00 AM PDT by LTCJ (Gridlock '05 - the Lesser of Three Evils.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand
"In short, what I'm trying to say here is that for a person to gain access to the storage area where classified information is kept means that they've already agreed in writing on the prescribed methods and guidelines for the handling of such information. "

Hugh Hewitt talked about the process and it was amazing. The warnings/agreement you speak of is apparently also affixed to many of the documents. Bergler did this because (1) he was incredibly arrogant or (2) incredibly scared. Time will tell...

360 posted on 07/22/2004 7:47:07 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 461-466 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson