Skip to comments.
Berger May Have Taken Documents That Replaced Earlier Documents He Took!
Washington Post ^
| Monday, July 19, 2004; 9:11 PM
| By John Solomon
Posted on 07/19/2004 8:08:07 PM PDT by joinedafterattack
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: LincolnLover
Could we dare to dream of a smoldering Clinton-era scandal that stretches through the Dem conventionWe don't need to dream or fantasize. We need to smack these tyrants up the head sideways as long as it follows the law. Clinton, although still popular in SOME circles, is the biggest "stain" on the presidency in American history. It is a pity that W, by virtue of being re-elected just may have to 'pardon' Clinton in a few more years just as he leaves office.
21
posted on
07/19/2004 8:52:08 PM PDT
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: spectre; Diddle E. Squat
I wonder why they called Lindsey instead of the FBI or the USSS? Is he in charge of Clinton's documents STiLL?
As far as the first post, am I reading that correctly: he took the same report TWICE????
22
posted on
07/19/2004 8:53:52 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
To: joinedafterattack
It looks as if the FBI searched his safe and so forth after giving him plenty of time to destroy the stolen documents.
There are still a lot of clintonoids in the FBI, at the highest levels.
I also want to know why nobody was fired or arrested for calling Bruce Lindsay about this instead of the proper authorities.
23
posted on
07/19/2004 8:55:09 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Howlin
It looks like he reviewed it, "lost" it, was given a second copy, and then that copy and other documents disappeared. Those two copies were apparently "found," but the other documents still remain unaccounted for.
24
posted on
07/19/2004 8:55:27 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Kerry/Edwards: More Affordable Hair Care for America)
To: Howlin
Apparently he took the same report twice. Probably in hopes that there were no more copies.
25
posted on
07/19/2004 8:56:11 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: LincolnLover
If there really is fire amidst all this smoke, talk about the ultimate "Clinton smothers and steps all over John Kerry's convention" scenario. More like "fatal disease amidst the festering pustule of the Democratic Party"...
(Apologies offered for the analogy for those recently finishing dinner.)
To: mathurine
To: joinedafterattack
"Buried on Page 2: "Breuer said the Archives staff first raised concerns with Berger during an Oct. 2 review of documents that at least one copy of the post-millennium report he had reviewed earlier was missing. Berger was given a second copy that day, Breuer said. Officials familiar with the investigation said Archives staff specially marked the documents and when the new copy and others disappeared, Archives officials called Clinton attorney Bruce Lindsey to report the disappearance." 1. Berger destroyed a copy.
2. Later he destroyed another copy. 3. When reported to Clinton's legal trixter Bruce Lindsay (why Lindsay? why not the FBI?) , Lindsay ignores it. 4. .....and the Lamestream Press has no curiousity. Please inform your friends of the laziness (or complicity?) of the press.
28
posted on
07/19/2004 9:08:32 PM PDT
by
cookcounty
(LBJ sent him to VN. Nixon expressed him home. And JfK's too dumb to tell them apart!)
To: Citizen Tom Paine
... if you have a need to know something on the Secret level you undergo a background investigation and then are cleared for Secret. This Secret clearance only gives you access to info which you need to know. Similarly for Top Secret information except the restrictions are much more restrictive...that's the way it's supposed to work, but as a young 1st lt. overseas during the early stages of the Vietnam war I often had to receive and secure Top Secret documents (troop movements, etc) after hours while serving as duty officer - only when I returned stateside after eighteen months was I finally interviewed and given an official Top Secret clearance - presumably things tightened up significantly as the war progressed and hopefully are better now, but even under the system as it's "supposed" to work documents aren't always that secure - Berger would have had little trouble getting away with what he wanted, especially if he deliberately filched them, which of course he did.....
To: Howlin
I also got that. It seems he took them and then took their replacements.
This is unFREAKINGbelievable.
30
posted on
07/19/2004 9:17:52 PM PDT
by
diotima
(Telegram Sam, you're my main man)
To: diotima
It seems he took them and then took their replacements. But doesn't that fact alone prove it wasn't an accident? Doesn't the fact that he did it twice PROVE he did it on purpose? (What are the chances of 1) accidently taking a report twice and 2) having said report be the SAME report?
31
posted on
07/19/2004 9:20:39 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
To: diotima
I'm so utterly fed up with the evil lying hypocritical thieving gang known as the Democrat party and their liberal press pals. All they have done is shit on this country, yet all we hear is how awful a good man like President Bush is.
To: Howlin
It was inadvertant on purpose
33
posted on
07/19/2004 9:24:13 PM PDT
by
woofie
( I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.)
To: joinedafterattack
It will be a cold day in Phoenix when a Clintonista gets prosecuted. W's Justice Department will not prosecute (New Tone), and this story will be old news in 48 hours.
34
posted on
07/19/2004 9:24:44 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Do Chernobyl restaurants serve Curied chicken?)
To: Howlin
Well I mean HOW DO YOU 'ACCIDENTLY' REMOVE HIGHLY CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS FROM A GUARDED ROOM
ONCE? Either he has shit for brains ('I didn't know I wasn't supposed to remove top secret National Security reports')or he is pure incarnate evil. Guess which one I am leaning towards.
This was a premeditated crime. He needs to be prosecuted.
35
posted on
07/19/2004 9:26:23 PM PDT
by
diotima
(Telegram Sam, you're my main man)
To: Diddle E. Squat
Thanks for the ping! Wonder how the media will spin this one in case it has long legs and might come back to bite them. That would be poetic justice.
36
posted on
07/19/2004 9:26:24 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Win Another One for the Gipper!)
To: over3Owithabrain
If a Republican stole a paperclip, the press would call for a firing line.
37
posted on
07/19/2004 9:27:22 PM PDT
by
diotima
(Telegram Sam, you're my main man)
To: Howlin
Maybe he was doctoring the report and swapping out copies.
Why would the committee vault have more than one copy of anything? Nothing was supposed to leave the room.
38
posted on
07/19/2004 9:27:58 PM PDT
by
snooker
To: quantim
Exactly where he and his wife belong quantim, and that is no joke. Best case scenario is that once and for all the public would finally realize the destruction to this nation and our security this team of socialist, Marxist thugs caused. Dream on.
39
posted on
07/19/2004 9:30:40 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(What if the hokey pokey IS what it's all about? Become a monthly donor and find out!!!)
To: joinedafterattack
martha should be really mad if Sandy gets less attention or time than she did.
40
posted on
07/19/2004 9:32:35 PM PDT
by
ODDITHER
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson