Well, as if we couldn't have guessed this would happen!, How long until we find some WMDs too? and the liberal media already say that there are none JUST BECAUSE we haven't given them enough time to LOOK.
Iraq is a HUGE country and there is lots of sand to hide missles in, it's only a matter of time!
1 posted on
07/18/2004 11:41:25 PM PDT by
biotech9
To: biotech9
Believe it or not, this was just on CNN Headline news a short time ago (1:30 a.m. CDT; 7-19-04). I guess they figured: "What the heck? May as well and report it; everyone else is".
2 posted on
07/18/2004 11:44:42 PM PDT by
no dems
(I obey whatever the voices in my wife's head tell me to do.)
To: biotech9
Also, i should point out,
Iraq is around 500,000 square KMs (whats that in miles lol!)
And Ireland is only 10% of that!
But in Ireland they still hardly ever find the weapon caches of the IRA and the other groups, SO HOW CAN THEY EXPECT MORE IN IRAQ??
These are well hidden caches of dangerous weapons! and it will take time!
3 posted on
07/18/2004 11:44:51 PM PDT by
biotech9
To: biotech9
Bush DIDN'T lie? This is going to be big news! Front page headline, radio and TV. Leftists recanting there views, Kerry surrendering. Yea, I dreaming...
4 posted on
07/18/2004 11:45:20 PM PDT by
endthematrix
(To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
To: biotech9
My hope ia that this campaign will be one news story after another proving W was right
5 posted on
07/18/2004 11:45:38 PM PDT by
woofie
( I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.)
To: biotech9
aaarrgghhh, cantya do some formatting here???
My eyes hurt man!!
7 posted on
07/18/2004 11:51:33 PM PDT by
prophetic
To: biotech9
The big question I have is how much time does it take to load up the nuclear material and other WMDs on trucks and send them to Syria. Was anyone watching the boarder crossings while the Bush Administration was going the diplomacy route before the war?
Syria seems awfully quiet these days.
To: biotech9
So how do y'all think the New York Times will cover this?
A. Front Page Story with positive headline ("Bush is proven right")
B. Front Page Story with negative headline ("Struggling Bush gets backed up by flawed intelligence sources")
C. Tiny story buried deep in the newspaper
D. In a story cataloging all the "lies" that Bush told, with this as an example of the small number of accurate claims.
E. No coverage at all
My guess would be either choice C or D. What do y'all expect to see?
14 posted on
07/19/2004 12:18:51 AM PDT by
dmc8576
(High School Students for Bush - 325 members ....Students for Kerry - 20 members. ENOUGH SAID!!!)
To: biotech9; All
15 posted on
07/19/2004 12:19:02 AM PDT by
backhoe
(Just an old Cold Warrior, draggin' his BAR into the Sunset...)
To: biotech9
In an addendum to the report, Roberts and two other Republicans accused Wilson of providing "inaccurate, unsubstantiated and misleading" information. In a letter to committee leaders Thursday, Wilson said a thorough reading of the report supports his public comments.""
Wilson Lied! Throw his sorry butt in jail!
To: biotech9
I'm pleased to see this being acknowledged in the press. If you hadn't posted it, I would not have known. It's also good to see some of the alphabet news channels eating their words.
At the same time, I'm proud my first thought was "Duh".
32 posted on
07/19/2004 2:27:25 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: biotech9
I'm sure that Saddam wanted all that uranium because he needed it to manufacture glow in the dark watch dials.
To: biotech9
To: biotech9
43 posted on
07/19/2004 8:22:58 AM PDT by
Christian4Bush
(I approve this message: character and integrity matter. Bush/Cheney '04)
To: biotech9
Sooo, the Senate Intell. report supports GWB on this. Everyone now supports the Senate Intell. report (applause, applause, cheer, cheer).
Are all the findings of the Senate Intell. Cmte. also to be applauded?
52 posted on
07/19/2004 10:12:16 AM PDT by
familyofman
(and the first animal is jettisoned - legs furiously pumping)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson