Posted on 07/18/2004 11:41:24 PM PDT by biotech9
Edited on 07/19/2004 12:03:36 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
It was one of the first signs that the intelligence used to go to war in Iraq was wrong: White House repudiation of 16 words in last year's State of the Union speech that had suggested Saddam Hussein (search) tried to buy uranium (search) in Africa. Yet even as two recent reports sharply criticized prewar intelligence, they also suggested President Bush's claim may not have been totally off-base. A British report concluded that Bush's statement and a similar one by Prime Minister Tony Blair (search) were "well-founded."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Win Power Ball? No, it would more like winning Power Ball 100X in a row with the same number.
Anyhow, it won't matter. They will yell 'lies, lies, lies' till they are hoarce.
They learned their lesson from Hitler, who once said 'Tell a lie big enough and often enough, and it becomes the truth'
Yeah,right....and I'm the Queen of England...Victoria. LOL
The queen of england is elizabeth, not victoria
Stick around and you'll learn the ins and outs and special jokes and slang on FR. :-)
OK, sorry, i am new here as you can see!
This kinda stuff just makes my blood boil thats all! This story will never get near the front pages of anything, but john kerry can't get OFF the damn front pages.
Hey...welcome to the club! It makes all of our collective blood boil,but that's why we come to FR.And then,we send out the FACTS,to everyone we know.So,in a way,all of us are BETTER than the MSM( mainstream media).
500000 square kilometers = 193,050.30 square miles [survey, U.S. statute] plus some odd decimal places.
I looked it up. Cool site here. I had no IDEA there was such a thing as a "square yottameter. Who knew?
Agreed. Syria is a danger. No telling how much of that stuff found its way in do Damascus. It seems that some of it went through Syria and then into Jordan.
YIKES>
In an addendum to the report, Roberts and two other Republicans accused Wilson of providing "inaccurate, unsubstantiated and misleading" information. In a letter to committee leaders Thursday, Wilson said a thorough reading of the report supports his public comments.""
Wilson Lied! Throw his sorry butt in jail!
"Wilson Lied! Throw his sorry butt in jail!"
To believe Wilson's lies, millions could have died.
At the same time, I'm proud my first thought was "Duh".
"Repudiate" was a keyword in the AP story. Watch for it to pop up in stories everywhere!
Repudiate is the new gravitas?
None of the above.
They published William Safire's opinion piece. End of story for the NYT!
Not necessarily, just favored by the AP writer last night.
////////////////
Updated: 03:44 PM EDT
Iraq Uranium Claim Gets Some Support
By KEN GUGGENHEIM, AP
WASHINGTON (July 18) - It was one of the first signs that the intelligence used to go to war in Iraq was wrong:
White House repudiation of 16 words in last year's State of the Union speech that had suggested Saddam Hussein tried to buy uranium in Africa.
Yet even as two recent reports sharply criticized prewar intelligence, they also suggested President Bush's claim may not have been totally off-base.
A British report concluded that Bush's statement and a similar one by Prime Minister Tony Blair were "well-founded." In his speech, Bush had attributed the uranium claim to the British government.
A Senate Intelligence Committee report found inadequate evidence that deposed Iraqi President Saddam had been rebuilding his nuclear weapons program. It cited various reports, however, that Iraq had sought uranium in Africa. Thus, although Bush cited only British documents that later proved to have been forged,
(I must comment: weren't these documents Italian?)
intelligence files clearly contained other evidence of the truth of the claim.
The committee chairman, Sen. Pat Roberts, said he believed last year that the White House was correct in repudiating the uranium claim. "Now I don't know whether it's accurate or not. That's the whole question," Roberts, R-Kan., said in an interview.
The White House's repudiation came after The New York Times published an op-ed column by former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who was sent by the CIA to Niger to determine if Iraq had been acquiring uranium. Wilson said it was unlikely any uranium transaction had taken place and the administration appeared to have been manipulating the intelligence.
Republicans said Wilson was trying to boost John Kerry's presidential campaign and looked to discredit him and his mission. (comment: Last year Kerry wasn't the presidential candidate)
Columnist Robert Novak, citing two unidentified Bush administration officials, wrote that Wilson's wife, CIA officer Valerie Plame, had recommended Wilson for the trip. That has led to a criminal investigation into the leak of Plame's identity.
The Senate report challenges Wilson's denial that his wife had a role in the selection and questions his account of the intelligence available at the time of his trip. It also said that his trip, rather than discrediting the Iraq-Niger link, actually bolstered the views of some analysts who suspected Saddam was seeking uranium.
In an addendum to the report, Roberts and two other Republicans accused Wilson of providing "inaccurate, unsubstantiated and misleading" information. In a letter to committee leaders Thursday, Wilson said a thorough reading of the report supports his public comments.
The CIA's acting director, John E. McLaughlin, told "Fox News Sunday," "I think there's some debate about what his report said or didn't say. I just don't want to take a position on it."
Bush, in his State of the Union address on Jan. 28, 2003, used the uranium intelligence to help make the case that Saddam was pursuing nuclear weapons. "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa," he said.
---snip---
But the Senate committee disclosed other intelligence suggesting that Iraq was pursuing uranium.
The committee cited separate reports received from foreign intelligence services on Oct. 15, 2001, and Feb. 5, 2002, and March 25, 2002. The State Department doubted the accuracy of the reports, but the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency had more confidence in them.
Though Wilson reported to U.S. officials there was `nothing to the story' that Niger sold uranium to Iraq, the CIA and DIA were intrigued by one element of his trip. Wilson had said a former prime minister of Niger, Ibrahim Mayaki, mentioned a visit from an Iraqi delegation in 1999 that expressed interest in expanding commercial ties with Niger, the world's third largest producer of mined uranium. Mayaki believed this meant they were interested in buying uranium.
The British inquiry said it was generally accepted that Iraqi officials visited Niger in 1999, and there was intelligence from several sources that the visit was to acquire uranium. "Since uranium constitutes almost three-quarters of Niger's exports, the intelligence was credible," the report said.
The Senate committee also described various reports about Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from French, British and unidentified foreign governments.
--snip--
I'm sure that Saddam wanted all that uranium because he needed it to manufacture glow in the dark watch dials.
Anyway... this story is HUGH!
:-)
>>Iraq is a HUGE country and there is lots of sand to hide missles in . . .
and war planes. Remember the MIG's that were found buried in the desert?
http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/sandplanes.asp
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_mig_buried_iraq6.htm
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/f/foxbat.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.