[dmc8576]

So how do y'all think the New York Times will cover this?

A. Front Page Story with positive headline ("Bush is proven right")

B. Front Page Story with negative headline ("Struggling Bush gets backed up by flawed intelligence sources")

C. Tiny story buried deep in the newspaper

D. In a story cataloging all the "lies" that Bush told, with this as an example of the small number of accurate claims.

E. No coverage at all

My guess would be either choice C or D. What do y'all expect to see?

[biotech9]

Damn straight!
If it wasn't for fox-news, you know DAMN WELL we'd never have heard about this story! For every newspaper that has the balls to tell the truth, there are fifty liberal biased rags that print only anti-bush, and-troop propoganda!
When are the american public going to WAKE UP to this leftist filth?

Without us helping each other out and supporting our troops, we'll never be able to have peace and beat down the terrorists that liberals keep defending!
I say some people should be charged with treason in this country to wake everyone up to the liberal traitors and their propaganda tactics.

[maica]

None of the above.

They published William Safire's opinion piece. End of story for the NYT!