Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IT?S OUTING SEASON! (Has Sen. Barbara Mikulski, been outed?)
NEW YORK PRESS ^ | 7/7/2004 | Michelangelo Signorile

Posted on 07/07/2004 11:39:03 AM PDT by carlo3b

 
IT’S OUTING SEASON!  (Has Sen. Barbara Mikulski, just been outed?)

Ready for the federal marriage amendment?

By Michelangelo Signorile

As the July 12 date nears for a vote on the federal marriage amendment, an outing panic has gripped Washington's political and media circles. Some gay activists have vowed to expose those closeted members of Congress who are supporting the amendment, as well as the closeted gay staffers of any member backing it. And it's not only right-wing Republicans who should be on notice. After initially indicating that she would vote against the constitutional amendment that would make gays and lesbians into second-class citizens, Sen. Barbara Mikulski's opposition to the amendment appears to have gone into the closet: Now that a vote is near, the Maryland Democrat—who is up for reelection in November—is suddenly not returning reporters' phone calls seeking her intentions on the vote, nor is she issuing any statements on the matter.

Mikulski's position on same-sex marriage isn't the only thing in her closet: The sexual orientation of the forever-unmarried 67-year-old has been an open secret for many years. But Mikulski has apparently always worried about what her working-class Democratic base in Maryland might think of her sexual orientation, making her irrationally petrified of ever discussing it (except to make heterosexual allusions).

These fears have made Mikulski less than a champion of gay rights, perhaps lest anyone think she might be gay herself. Back in the 80s, when Mikulski was first running for the Senate, the Republicans brought in as her opponent none other than the nasty anti-feminist Linda Chavez—the columnist and pundit who years later would drop out as George W. Bush's Labor Secretary nominee amid a scandal over her having paid her housekeeper off the books. During the Senate campaign, Chavez engaged in her own bit of gay-baiting, accusing Mikulski of being a "San Francisco-style Democrat" who should come "out of the closet." She also attacked Mikulski for hiring an Australian feminist academic, Teresa Mary Brennan, as a congressional aide in 1981, and went after Mikulski for supporting the Equal Rights Amendment, charging that the ERA would "open up the whole question of homosexual marriage."

It had been widely reported that Brennan, at the time of her employment, was living with Mikulski at her Fells Point home for two months. Chavez's campaign manager told reporters that in the final two weeks of the campaign, tv commercials would focus on Mikulski's relationship with Brennan. Mikulski's response was to go gaga over a hunky guy at a campaign event.

"Are you single?" the short, squat Mikulski asked a body shop owner in the crowd. "Give me a call after the election. I won't be so busy then."

(As far as I'm concerned, Mikulski opened up her private life that day, implying that she certainly had a sexual orientation, though trying to make us believe it was of the heterosexual variety.)

Mikulski won the election by a wide margin, but she learned that she'd always be gay-baited, so it was perhaps best to vote against gays. This strategy seemed to culminate in 1996 when Mikulski voted in favor of the wretched Defense of Marriage Act, incurring the wrath of gay activists. At a Barnes & Noble in Chelsea that year—promoting a mystery novel she'd co-written, called Capitol Offense—Mikulski was confronted by several gay activists and journalists, including me.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypress.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: actup; fma; gay; homo; homosexual; homosexualagenda; mikulski; prisoners; terrorist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: carlo3b
"After initially indicating that she would vote against the constitutional amendment that would make gays and lesbians into second-class citizens..."

Couldn't read past that point. What are they now? They have representation in government, insurance, custody battles and the right to adopt and indoctrinate children into their lifestyle choice. What more do they need? The right to pay more in taxes and b*tch that their former "marriage partner" was running around, threw him/her/it out of the house, filed for divorce and took him/her/it to the cleaners?

21 posted on 07/07/2004 11:51:09 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; carlo3b
I remember reading that the Senate swimming pool is actually listed as a nude facililty. The article that reported this included the following editorial comment:
And you'd better believe the place clears out when Barbara Mikulski shows up for a swim!

22 posted on 07/07/2004 11:51:28 AM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: South40

Now cut that out!


23 posted on 07/07/2004 11:52:13 AM PDT by wtc911 (moderate islam is the swamp where evil festers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
And you'd better believe the place clears out when Barbara Mikulski shows up for a swim!

I imagine that Orrin Hatch or Trent Lott would have a similar bipartisan impact...

24 posted on 07/07/2004 11:52:20 AM PDT by dirtboy (John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

She's a MAN, baby!


25 posted on 07/07/2004 11:52:38 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
"I believe this despicable action qualifies as extortion and blackmail under most criminal laws. Where is John Ashcroft when we need him."

We appear not to be a country of laws any longer.

26 posted on 07/07/2004 11:54:40 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

Somebody thinks shes HOT... Think about it YIKES!!!{{{{{SHIVERS}}}}}


27 posted on 07/07/2004 11:55:10 AM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
PLEASE OPEN THE CLOSET DOOR, AND LET THE LIGHT SHINE IN...


Looks like the grand opening of a new lesbian bar.

28 posted on 07/07/2004 11:55:28 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
the short, squat Mikulski

ROTFLMAO! Just what every woman desires! To be described as short and SQUAT!

29 posted on 07/07/2004 11:56:15 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

Mr. Specter may have some staffer issues too.


30 posted on 07/07/2004 11:56:23 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

still on the server...

31 posted on 07/07/2004 11:57:49 AM PDT by steveo (Member of: Fathers Against Rude Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

I lived in MD in that election and voted against her, athough I was a registered Dem at the time. I didn't remember that it was Chavez who ran against her. I just always assumed that Mikulski was a lesbian. I didn't realize that it was a not well-known fact.


32 posted on 07/07/2004 11:58:02 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

On behalf of toads worldwide, I demand a retraction and an apology.


33 posted on 07/07/2004 11:59:06 AM PDT by Fixit ("W" vs "F" -- The mark of a winner vs. the sign of a failing grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer

Barb, Hilary and friends enjoy the Indigo Girls at TRIBE-AID'04


34 posted on 07/07/2004 11:59:48 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Ni Jesus, Ni Marx..OUI REAGAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
The sexual orientation of the forever-unmarried 67-year-old has been an open secret for many years.

Verily, did she ever have an hetero option? Wouldn't some male have to volunteer to prove her hetero bona fides?

I nominate the author, Michelangelo Signorile, to prove that Barbara is hetero. Go ahead Mike, and tell us all about it.

35 posted on 07/07/2004 12:00:41 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

Let me see if I understand them. They are going to fight the stigma of homosexuality (it ought to be a stigma) by plastering certain people that bug them with the stigma of homosexuality?


36 posted on 07/07/2004 12:00:57 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

A person whether male or female would have to be sick in the head to even think of doing anything with that troll.


37 posted on 07/07/2004 12:00:57 PM PDT by Ham Hock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
IS YOUR CONGRESSCRITTER... a.. somethin you know.. different?.. :)
38 posted on 07/07/2004 12:01:04 PM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer

Babes.


39 posted on 07/07/2004 12:01:22 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

I remember seeing her election posters on the highways of maryland, and I used to think how in the world can she be elected for anything ,she has always BEEN UGLY ,they used to call her ,and some other fellow back there rubber lips ,they both flopped and spitted at the same time.


40 posted on 07/07/2004 12:01:42 PM PDT by douglas1 (and IF LEFT UP TO YOU AND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson